author | kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760 |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:55:38 +0000 | |
changeset 142 | 16539d77fb37 |
parent 136 | 77a311b5e2df |
child 145 | b5c1a6aec50d |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
98 | 1 |
%!TEX root = ../blob1.tex |
2 |
||
3 |
\section{Introduction} |
|
4 |
||
131 | 5 |
[some things to cover in the intro] |
6 |
\begin{itemize} |
|
7 |
\item explain relation between old and new blob complex definitions |
|
8 |
\item overview of sections |
|
9 |
\item state main properties of blob complex (already mostly done below) |
|
10 |
\item give multiple motivations/viewpoints for blob complex: (1) derived cat |
|
11 |
version of TQFT Hilbert space; (2) generalization of Hochschild homology to higher $n$-cats; |
|
12 |
(3) ? sort-of-obvious colimit type construction; |
|
13 |
(4) ? a generalization of $C_*(\Maps(M, T))$ to the case where $T$ is |
|
14 |
a category rather than a manifold |
|
15 |
\item hope to apply to Kh, contact, (other examples?) in the future |
|
16 |
\item ?? we have resisted the temptation |
|
17 |
(actually, it was not a temptation) to state things in the greatest |
|
18 |
generality possible |
|
19 |
\item related: we are being unsophisticated from a homotopy theory point of |
|
20 |
view and using chain complexes in many places where we could be by with spaces |
|
21 |
\item ? one of the points we make (far) below is that there is not really much |
|
22 |
difference between (a) systems of fields and local relations and (b) $n$-cats; |
|
23 |
thus we tend to switch between talking in terms of one or the other |
|
24 |
\end{itemize} |
|
25 |
||
26 |
\medskip\hrule\medskip |
|
27 |
||
28 |
[Old outline for intro] |
|
98 | 29 |
\begin{itemize} |
30 |
\item Starting point: TQFTs via fields and local relations. |
|
31 |
This gives a satisfactory treatment for semisimple TQFTs |
|
32 |
(i.e.\ TQFTs for which the cylinder 1-category associated to an |
|
33 |
$n{-}1$-manifold $Y$ is semisimple for all $Y$). |
|
34 |
\item For non-semiemple TQFTs, this approach is less satisfactory. |
|
35 |
Our main motivating example (though we will not develop it in this paper) |
|
36 |
is the $4{+}1$-dimensional TQFT associated to Khovanov homology. |
|
37 |
It associates a bigraded vector space $A_{Kh}(W^4, L)$ to a 4-manifold $W$ together |
|
38 |
with a link $L \subset \bd W$. |
|
39 |
The original Khovanov homology of a link in $S^3$ is recovered as $A_{Kh}(B^4, L)$. |
|
40 |
\item How would we go about computing $A_{Kh}(W^4, L)$? |
|
41 |
For $A_{Kh}(B^4, L)$, the main tool is the exact triangle (long exact sequence) |
|
42 |
\nn{... $L_1, L_2, L_3$}. |
|
43 |
Unfortunately, the exactness breaks if we glue $B^4$ to itself and attempt |
|
44 |
to compute $A_{Kh}(S^1\times B^3, L)$. |
|
45 |
According to the gluing theorem for TQFTs-via-fields, gluing along $B^3 \subset \bd B^4$ |
|
46 |
corresponds to taking a coend (self tensor product) over the cylinder category |
|
47 |
associated to $B^3$ (with appropriate boundary conditions). |
|
48 |
The coend is not an exact functor, so the exactness of the triangle breaks. |
|
49 |
\item The obvious solution to this problem is to replace the coend with its derived counterpart. |
|
50 |
This presumably works fine for $S^1\times B^3$ (the answer being the Hochschild homology |
|
51 |
of an appropriate bimodule), but for more complicated 4-manifolds this leaves much to be desired. |
|
52 |
If we build our manifold up via a handle decomposition, the computation |
|
53 |
would be a sequence of derived coends. |
|
54 |
A different handle decomposition of the same manifold would yield a different |
|
55 |
sequence of derived coends. |
|
56 |
To show that our definition in terms of derived coends is well-defined, we |
|
57 |
would need to show that the above two sequences of derived coends yield the same answer. |
|
58 |
This is probably not easy to do. |
|
59 |
\item Instead, we would prefer a definition for a derived version of $A_{Kh}(W^4, L)$ |
|
60 |
which is manifestly invariant. |
|
61 |
(That is, a definition that does not |
|
62 |
involve choosing a decomposition of $W$. |
|
63 |
After all, one of the virtues of our starting point --- TQFTs via field and local relations --- |
|
64 |
is that it has just this sort of manifest invariance.) |
|
65 |
\item The solution is to replace $A_{Kh}(W^4, L)$, which is a quotient |
|
66 |
\[ |
|
67 |
\text{linear combinations of fields} \;\big/\; \text{local relations} , |
|
68 |
\] |
|
69 |
with an appropriately free resolution (the ``blob complex") |
|
70 |
\[ |
|
71 |
\cdots\to \bc_2(W, L) \to \bc_1(W, L) \to \bc_0(W, L) . |
|
72 |
\] |
|
73 |
Here $\bc_0$ is linear combinations of fields on $W$, |
|
74 |
$\bc_1$ is linear combinations of local relations on $W$, |
|
75 |
$\bc_2$ is linear combinations of relations amongst relations on $W$, |
|
76 |
and so on. |
|
77 |
\item None of the above ideas depend on the details of the Khovanov homology example, |
|
78 |
so we develop the general theory in the paper and postpone specific applications |
|
79 |
to later papers. |
|
80 |
\item The blob complex enjoys the following nice properties \nn{...} |
|
81 |
\end{itemize} |
|
82 |
||
83 |
\bigskip |
|
84 |
\hrule |
|
85 |
\bigskip |
|
86 |
||
131 | 87 |
We then show that blob homology enjoys the following properties. |
98 | 88 |
|
89 |
\begin{property}[Functoriality] |
|
90 |
\label{property:functoriality}% |
|
136 | 91 |
The blob complex is functorial with respect to homeomorphisms. That is, |
131 | 92 |
for fixed $n$-category / fields $\cC$, the association |
98 | 93 |
\begin{equation*} |
131 | 94 |
X \mapsto \bc_*^{\cC}(X) |
98 | 95 |
\end{equation*} |
131 | 96 |
is a functor from $n$-manifolds and homeomorphisms between them to chain complexes and isomorphisms between them. |
98 | 97 |
\end{property} |
98 |
||
136 | 99 |
The blob complex is also functorial with respect to $\cC$, although we will not address this in detail here. |
131 | 100 |
|
98 | 101 |
\begin{property}[Disjoint union] |
102 |
\label{property:disjoint-union} |
|
103 |
The blob complex of a disjoint union is naturally the tensor product of the blob complexes. |
|
104 |
\begin{equation*} |
|
105 |
\bc_*(X_1 \du X_2) \iso \bc_*(X_1) \tensor \bc_*(X_2) |
|
106 |
\end{equation*} |
|
107 |
\end{property} |
|
108 |
||
136 | 109 |
If an $n$-manifold $X_\text{cut}$ contains $Y \sqcup Y^\text{op}$ as a codimension $0$-submanifold of its boundary, write $X_\text{glued} = X_\text{cut} \bigcup_{Y}\selfarrow$ for the manifold obtained by gluing together $Y$ and $Y^\text{op}$. Note that this includes the case of gluing two disjoint manifolds together. |
131 | 110 |
\begin{property}[Gluing map] |
98 | 111 |
\label{property:gluing-map}% |
136 | 112 |
%If $X_1$ and $X_2$ are $n$-manifolds, with $Y$ a codimension $0$-submanifold of $\bdy X_1$, and $Y^{\text{op}}$ a codimension $0$-submanifold of $\bdy X_2$, there is a chain map |
113 |
%\begin{equation*} |
|
114 |
%\gl_Y: \bc_*(X_1) \tensor \bc_*(X_2) \to \bc_*(X_1 \cup_Y X_2). |
|
115 |
%\end{equation*} |
|
116 |
Given a gluing $X_\mathrm{cut} \to X_\mathrm{glued}$, there is |
|
131 | 117 |
a natural map |
118 |
\[ |
|
136 | 119 |
\bc_*(X_\mathrm{cut}) \to \bc_*(X_\mathrm{glued}) . |
131 | 120 |
\] |
121 |
(Natural with respect to homeomorphisms, and also associative with respect to iterated gluings.) |
|
98 | 122 |
\end{property} |
123 |
||
124 |
\begin{property}[Contractibility] |
|
125 |
\label{property:contractibility}% |
|
126 |
\todo{Err, requires a splitting?} |
|
136 | 127 |
The blob complex on an $n$-ball is contractible in the sense that it is quasi-isomorphic to its $0$-th homology. Moreover, the $0$-th homology of balls can be canonically identified with the original $n$-category $\cC$. |
98 | 128 |
\begin{equation} |
129 |
\xymatrix{\bc_*^{\cC}(B^n) \ar[r]^{\iso}_{\text{qi}} & H_0(\bc_*^{\cC}(B^n))} |
|
130 |
\end{equation} |
|
131 |
\end{property} |
|
132 |
||
133 |
\begin{property}[Skein modules] |
|
134 |
\label{property:skein-modules}% |
|
135 |
The $0$-th blob homology of $X$ is the usual |
|
136 |
(dual) TQFT Hilbert space (a.k.a.\ skein module) associated to $X$ |
|
131 | 137 |
by $\cC$. (See \S \ref{sec:local-relations}.) |
98 | 138 |
\begin{equation*} |
131 | 139 |
H_0(\bc_*^{\cC}(X)) \iso A^{\cC}(X) |
98 | 140 |
\end{equation*} |
141 |
\end{property} |
|
142 |
||
143 |
\begin{property}[Hochschild homology when $X=S^1$] |
|
144 |
\label{property:hochschild}% |
|
145 |
The blob complex for a $1$-category $\cC$ on the circle is |
|
146 |
quasi-isomorphic to the Hochschild complex. |
|
147 |
\begin{equation*} |
|
136 | 148 |
\xymatrix{\bc_*^{\cC}(S^1) \ar[r]^{\iso}_{\text{qi}} & \HC_*(\cC)} |
98 | 149 |
\end{equation*} |
150 |
\end{property} |
|
151 |
||
132 | 152 |
|
136 | 153 |
\begin{property}[$C_*(\Diff(-))$ action] |
98 | 154 |
\label{property:evaluation}% |
132 | 155 |
There is a chain map |
98 | 156 |
\begin{equation*} |
157 |
\ev_X: \CD{X} \tensor \bc_*(X) \to \bc_*(X). |
|
158 |
\end{equation*} |
|
159 |
(Here $\CD{X}$ is the singular chain complex of the space of diffeomorphisms of $X$, fixed on $\bdy X$.) |
|
160 |
||
161 |
Restricted to $C_0(\Diff(X))$ this is just the action of diffeomorphisms described in Property \ref{property:functoriality}. Further, for |
|
162 |
any codimension $1$-submanifold $Y \subset X$ dividing $X$ into $X_1 \cup_Y X_2$, the following diagram |
|
163 |
(using the gluing maps described in Property \ref{property:gluing-map}) commutes. |
|
164 |
\begin{equation*} |
|
165 |
\xymatrix{ |
|
166 |
\CD{X} \otimes \bc_*(X) \ar[r]^{\ev_X} & \bc_*(X) \\ |
|
167 |
\CD{X_1} \otimes \CD{X_2} \otimes \bc_*(X_1) \otimes \bc_*(X_2) |
|
168 |
\ar@/_4ex/[r]_{\ev_{X_1} \otimes \ev_{X_2}} \ar[u]^{\gl^{\Diff}_Y \otimes \gl_Y} & |
|
169 |
\bc_*(X_1) \otimes \bc_*(X_2) \ar[u]_{\gl_Y} |
|
170 |
} |
|
171 |
\end{equation*} |
|
172 |
\nn{should probably say something about associativity here (or not?)} |
|
132 | 173 |
\nn{maybe do self-gluing instead of 2 pieces case} |
98 | 174 |
\end{property} |
175 |
||
136 | 176 |
There is a version of the blob complex for $\cC$ an $A_\infty$ $n$-category |
177 |
instead of a garden variety $n$-category. |
|
178 |
||
179 |
\begin{property}[Product formula] |
|
180 |
Let $M^n = Y^{n-k}\times W^k$ and let $\cC$ be an $n$-category. |
|
181 |
Let $A_*(Y)$ be the $A_\infty$ $k$-category associated to $Y$ via blob homology, which associates to each $k$-ball $D$ the complex $A_*(Y)(D) = \bc_*(Y \times D, \cC)$. |
|
182 |
Then |
|
183 |
\[ |
|
184 |
\bc_*(Y^{n-k}\times W^k, \cC) \simeq \bc_*(W, A_*(Y)) . |
|
185 |
\] |
|
186 |
Note on the right here we have the version of the blob complex for $A_\infty$ $n$-categories. |
|
187 |
\nn{say something about general fiber bundles?} |
|
188 |
\end{property} |
|
98 | 189 |
|
190 |
\begin{property}[Gluing formula] |
|
191 |
\label{property:gluing}% |
|
192 |
\mbox{}% <-- gets the indenting right |
|
193 |
\begin{itemize} |
|
194 |
\item For any $(n-1)$-manifold $Y$, the blob homology of $Y \times I$ is |
|
195 |
naturally an $A_\infty$ category. % We'll write $\bc_*(Y)$ for $\bc_*(Y \times I)$ below. |
|
196 |
||
197 |
\item For any $n$-manifold $X$, with $Y$ a codimension $0$-submanifold of its boundary, the blob homology of $X$ is naturally an |
|
198 |
$A_\infty$ module for $\bc_*(Y \times I)$. |
|
199 |
||
136 | 200 |
\item For any $n$-manifold $X_\text{glued} = X_\text{cut} \bigcup_Y \selfarrow$, the blob complex $\bc_*(X_\text{glued})$ is the $A_\infty$ self-tensor product of |
201 |
$\bc_*(X_\text{cut})$ as an $\bc_*(Y \times I)$-bimodule. |
|
98 | 202 |
\begin{equation*} |
136 | 203 |
\bc_*(X_\text{glued}) \simeq \bc_*(X_\text{cut}) \Tensor^{A_\infty}_{\mathclap{\bc_*(Y \times I)}} \selfarrow |
98 | 204 |
\end{equation*} |
205 |
\end{itemize} |
|
206 |
\end{property} |
|
207 |
||
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
208 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
209 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
210 |
\begin{property}[Relation to mapping spaces] |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
211 |
Let $\pi^\infty_{\le n}(W)$ denote the $A_\infty$ $n$-category based on maps |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
212 |
$B^n \to W$. |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
213 |
(The case $n=1$ is the usual $A_\infty$ category of paths in $W$.) |
136 | 214 |
Then |
215 |
$$\bc_*(M, \pi^\infty_{\le n}(W) \simeq \CM{M}{W}.$$ |
|
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
216 |
\end{property} |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
217 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
218 |
\begin{property}[Higher dimensional Deligne conjecture] |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
219 |
The singular chains of the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad act on blob cochains. |
136 | 220 |
\end{property} |
221 |
\begin{rem} |
|
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
222 |
The $n$-dimensional fat graph operad can be thought of as a sequence of general surgeries |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
223 |
of $n$-manifolds |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
224 |
$R_i \cup A_i \leadsto R_i \cup B_i$ together with mapping cylinders of diffeomorphisms |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
225 |
$f_i: R_i\cup B_i \to R_{i+1}\cup A_{i+1}$. |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
226 |
(Note that the suboperad where $A_i$, $B_i$ and $R_i\cup A_i$ are all diffeomorphic to |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
227 |
the $n$-ball is equivalent to the little $n{+}1$-disks operad.) |
136 | 228 |
If $A$ and $B$ are $n$-manifolds sharing the same boundary, we define |
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
229 |
the blob cochains $\bc^*(A, B)$ (analogous to Hochschild cohomology) to be |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
230 |
$A_\infty$ maps from $\bc_*(A)$ to $\bc_*(B)$, where we think of both |
136 | 231 |
collections of complexes as modules over the $A_\infty$ category associated to $\bd A = \bd B$. |
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
232 |
The ``holes" in the above |
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
233 |
$n$-dimensional fat graph operad are labeled by $\bc^*(A_i, B_i)$. |
136 | 234 |
\end{rem} |
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
235 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
236 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
237 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
238 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
239 |
|
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
240 |
|
98 | 241 |
|
242 |
Properties \ref{property:functoriality}, \ref{property:gluing-map} and \ref{property:skein-modules} will be immediate from the definition given in |
|
243 |
\S \ref{sec:blob-definition}, and we'll recall them at the appropriate points there. \todo{Make sure this gets done.} |
|
244 |
Properties \ref{property:disjoint-union} and \ref{property:contractibility} are established in \S \ref{sec:basic-properties}. |
|
245 |
Property \ref{property:hochschild} is established in \S \ref{sec:hochschild}, Property \ref{property:evaluation} in \S \ref{sec:evaluation}, |
|
246 |
and Property \ref{property:gluing} in \S \ref{sec:gluing}. |
|
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
98
diff
changeset
|
247 |
\nn{need to say where the remaining properties are proved.} |