* We need to be clearer about which types of homeomorphisms the

"localization" theorem in the appendix works for, in the body of the

paper. Options here include:

a) having a better theorem in a separate paper, so we don't actually

need to worry 

[** currently working on this option]

b) changing the statements in the paper, for example writing PL-Homeo

everywhere instead of Homeo

c) explicitly saying "Homeo means PL-Homeo" everywhere

c') if we succumb to Peter's suggestion of say "Iso" everywhere,

perhaps we could adopt the notation that "Iso^*" or similar means one

of a restricted set of categories, where the appendix works, and using

this notation in section 5.

* Consider moving A_\infty stuff to a subsection

* framings and duality -- work out what's going on! (alternatively, vague-ify current statement)

* consider proving the gluing formula for higher codimension manifolds with

morita equivalence

* Peter's suggestion for A_inf definition

* enriching in other \infty categories, explaining how "D" should

interact with coproducts in "S" (break out A_\infty stuff into a

subsection)

* SCOTT will go through appendix C.2 and make it better

* In the appendix on n=1, explain more about orientations. Also say

what happens on objects for spin manifolds: the unique point has an

automorphism, which translates into a involution on objects. Mention

super-stuff.

colimit subsection: 

* Labeling of the k-1 skeleton agreeing on the k-2 skeleton is awfully vague. 

* Boundary of \cl; not so easy to see!

modules:

* Lemma 6.4.5 needs to actually construct this map! Needs more input! Do

we actually need this as written?

	- KW will look at it; probably needs to be weakened

* SCOTT: typo in delfig3a -- upper g should be g^{-1}

* SCOTT: make sure acknowledge list doesn't omit anyone from blob seminar who should be included (I think I have all the speakers; does anyone other that the speakers rate a mention?)

* review colors in figures

* ? define Morita equivalence?

* make sure we are clear that boundary = germ

* lemma [inject  6.3.5?] assumes more splittablity than the axioms imply (?)

* consider putting conditions for enriched n-cat all in one place

* SCOTT: figure for example 3.1.2 (sin 1/z)

* SCOTT: add vertical arrow to middle of figure 19 (decomp poset)