author | kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760 |
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:08:49 +0000 | |
changeset 131 | f8d909559d19 |
parent 123 | a5e863658e74 |
child 133 | 7a880cdaac70 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
113 | 1 |
%!TEX root = ../blob1.tex |
2 |
||
3 |
\section{The blob complex for $A_\infty$ $n$-categories} |
|
4 |
\label{sec:ainfblob} |
|
5 |
||
6 |
Given an $A_\infty$ $n$-category $\cC$ and an $n$-manifold $M$, we define the blob |
|
7 |
complex $\bc_*(M)$ to the be the colimit $\cC(M)$ of Section \ref{sec:ncats}. |
|
8 |
\nn{say something about this being anticlimatically tautological?} |
|
9 |
We will show below |
|
10 |
\nn{give ref} |
|
11 |
that this agrees (up to homotopy) with our original definition of the blob complex |
|
12 |
in the case of plain $n$-categories. |
|
13 |
When we need to distinguish between the new and old definitions, we will refer to the |
|
14 |
new-fangled and old-fashioned blob complex. |
|
15 |
||
16 |
\medskip |
|
17 |
||
18 |
Let $M^n = Y^k\times F^{n-k}$. |
|
19 |
Let $C$ be a plain $n$-category. |
|
20 |
Let $\cF$ be the $A_\infty$ $k$-category which assigns to a $k$-ball |
|
21 |
$X$ the old-fashioned blob complex $\bc_*(X\times F)$. |
|
22 |
||
123 | 23 |
\begin{thm} \label{product_thm} |
113 | 24 |
The old-fashioned blob complex $\bc_*^C(Y\times F)$ is homotopy equivalent to the |
25 |
new-fangled blob complex $\bc_*^\cF(Y)$. |
|
26 |
\end{thm} |
|
27 |
||
28 |
\begin{proof} |
|
29 |
We will use the concrete description of the colimit from Subsection \ref{ss:ncat_fields}. |
|
30 |
||
123 | 31 |
First we define a map |
32 |
\[ |
|
33 |
\psi: \bc_*^\cF(Y) \to \bc_*^C(Y\times F) . |
|
34 |
\] |
|
113 | 35 |
In filtration degree 0 we just glue together the various blob diagrams on $X\times F$ |
36 |
(where $X$ is a component of a permissible decomposition of $Y$) to get a blob diagram on |
|
37 |
$Y\times F$. |
|
38 |
In filtration degrees 1 and higher we define the map to be zero. |
|
39 |
It is easy to check that this is a chain map. |
|
40 |
||
123 | 41 |
Next we define a map |
42 |
\[ |
|
43 |
\phi: \bc_*^C(Y\times F) \to \bc_*^\cF(Y) . |
|
44 |
\] |
|
113 | 45 |
Actually, we will define it on the homotopy equivalent subcomplex |
115 | 46 |
$\cS_* \sub \bc_*^C(Y\times F)$ generated by blob diagrams which are small with |
47 |
respect to some open cover |
|
113 | 48 |
of $Y\times F$. |
49 |
\nn{need reference to small blob lemma} |
|
50 |
We will have to show eventually that this is independent (up to homotopy) of the choice of cover. |
|
51 |
Also, for a fixed choice of cover we will only be able to define the map for blob degree less than |
|
52 |
some bound, but this bound goes to infinity as the cover become finer. |
|
53 |
||
115 | 54 |
Given a decomposition $K$ of $Y$ into $k$-balls $X_i$, let $K\times F$ denote the corresponding |
55 |
decomposition of $Y\times F$ into the pieces $X_i\times F$. |
|
56 |
||
57 |
%We will define $\phi$ inductively, starting at blob degree 0. |
|
58 |
%Given a 0-blob diagram $x$ on $Y\times F$, we can choose a decomposition $K$ of $Y$ |
|
59 |
%such that $x$ is splittable with respect to $K\times F$. |
|
60 |
%This defines a filtration degree 0 element of $\bc_*^\cF(Y)$ |
|
61 |
||
62 |
We will define $\phi$ using a variant of the method of acyclic models. |
|
122 | 63 |
Let $a\in \cS_m$ be a blob diagram on $Y\times F$. |
64 |
For $m$ sufficiently small there exists a decomposition $K$ of $Y$ into $k$-balls such that the |
|
123 | 65 |
codimension 1 cells of $K\times F$ miss the blobs of $a$, and more generally such that $a$ is splittable along (the codimension-1 part of) $K\times F$. |
115 | 66 |
Let $D(a)$ denote the subcomplex of $\bc_*^\cF(Y)$ generated by all $(a, \bar{K})$ |
67 |
such that each $K_i$ has the aforementioned splittable property |
|
68 |
(see Subsection \ref{ss:ncat_fields}). |
|
116 | 69 |
\nn{need to define $D(a)$ more clearly; also includes $(b_j, \bar{K})$ where |
70 |
$\bd(a) = \sum b_j$.} |
|
71 |
(By $(a, \bar{K})$ we really mean $(a^\sharp, \bar{K})$, where $a^\sharp$ is |
|
115 | 72 |
$a$ split according to $K_0\times F$. |
73 |
To simplify notation we will just write plain $a$ instead of $a^\sharp$.) |
|
74 |
Roughly speaking, $D(a)$ consists of filtration degree 0 stuff which glues up to give |
|
75 |
$a$, filtration degree 1 stuff which makes all of the filtration degree 0 stuff homologous, |
|
76 |
filtration degree 2 stuff which kills the homology created by the |
|
77 |
filtration degree 1 stuff, and so on. |
|
78 |
More formally, |
|
79 |
||
80 |
\begin{lemma} |
|
81 |
$D(a)$ is acyclic. |
|
82 |
\end{lemma} |
|
83 |
||
84 |
\begin{proof} |
|
85 |
We will prove acyclicity in the first couple of degrees, and \nn{in this draft, at least} |
|
86 |
leave the general case to the reader. |
|
116 | 87 |
|
115 | 88 |
Let $K$ and $K'$ be two decompositions of $Y$ compatible with $a$. |
116 | 89 |
We want to show that $(a, K)$ and $(a, K')$ are homologous via filtration degree 1 stuff. |
90 |
\nn{need to say this better; these two chains don't have the same boundary.} |
|
91 |
We might hope that $K$ and $K'$ have a common refinement, but this is not necessarily |
|
92 |
the case. |
|
93 |
(Consider the $x$-axis and the graph of $y = x^2\sin(1/x)$ in $\r^2$.) |
|
94 |
However, we {\it can} find another decomposition $L$ such that $L$ shares common |
|
95 |
refinements with both $K$ and $K'$. |
|
96 |
Let $KL$ and $K'L$ denote these two refinements. |
|
97 |
Then filtration degree 1 chains associated to the four anti-refinemnts |
|
98 |
$KL\to K$, $KL\to L$, $K'L\to L$ and $K'L\to K'$ |
|
99 |
give the desired chain connecting $(a, K)$ and $(a, K')$ |
|
119 | 100 |
(see Figure \ref{zzz4}). |
101 |
||
102 |
\begin{figure}[!ht] |
|
103 |
\begin{equation*} |
|
104 |
\mathfig{.63}{tempkw/zz4} |
|
105 |
\end{equation*} |
|
106 |
\caption{Connecting $K$ and $K'$ via $L$} |
|
107 |
\label{zzz4} |
|
108 |
\end{figure} |
|
116 | 109 |
|
110 |
Consider a different choice of decomposition $L'$ in place of $L$ above. |
|
111 |
This leads to a cycle consisting of filtration degree 1 stuff. |
|
112 |
We want to show that this cycle bounds a chain of filtration degree 2 stuff. |
|
113 |
Choose a decomposition $M$ which has common refinements with each of |
|
114 |
$K$, $KL$, $L$, $K'L$, $K'$, $K'L'$, $L'$ and $KL'$. |
|
117
b62214646c4f
preparing for semi-public version soon
kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
116
diff
changeset
|
115 |
\nn{need to also require that $KLM$ antirefines to $KM$, etc.} |
119 | 116 |
Then we have a filtration degree 2 chain, as shown in Figure \ref{zzz5}, which does the trick. |
117 |
(Each small triangle in Figure \ref{zzz5} can be filled with a filtration degree 2 chain.) |
|
116 | 118 |
|
119 | 119 |
\begin{figure}[!ht] |
120 |
\begin{equation*} |
|
121 |
\mathfig{1.0}{tempkw/zz5} |
|
122 |
\end{equation*} |
|
123 |
\caption{Filling in $K$-$KL$-$L$-$K'L$-$K'$-$K'L'$-$L'$-$KL'$-$K$} |
|
124 |
\label{zzz5} |
|
125 |
\end{figure} |
|
116 | 126 |
|
123 | 127 |
Continuing in this way we see that $D(a)$ is acyclic. |
115 | 128 |
\end{proof} |
129 |
||
123 | 130 |
We are now in a position to apply the method of acyclic models to get a map |
131 |
$\phi:\cS_* \to \bc_*^\cF(Y)$. |
|
132 |
This map is defined in sufficiently low degrees, sends a blob diagram $a$ to $D(a)$, |
|
133 |
and is well-defined up to (iterated) homotopy. |
|
115 | 134 |
|
123 | 135 |
The subcomplex $\cS_* \subset \bc_*^C(Y\times F)$ depends on choice of cover of $Y\times F$. |
136 |
If we refine that cover, we get a complex $\cS'_* \subset \cS_*$ |
|
137 |
and a map $\phi':\cS'_* \to \bc_*^\cF(Y)$. |
|
138 |
$\phi'$ is defined only on homological degrees below some bound, but this bound is higher than |
|
139 |
the corresponding bound for $\phi$. |
|
140 |
We must show that $\phi$ and $\phi'$ agree, up to homotopy, |
|
141 |
on the intersection of the subcomplexes on which they are defined. |
|
142 |
This is clear, since the acyclic subcomplexes $D(a)$ above used in the definition of |
|
143 |
$\phi$ and $\phi'$ do not depend on the choice of cover. |
|
144 |
||
145 |
\nn{need to say (and justify) that we now have a map $\phi$ indep of choice of cover} |
|
146 |
||
147 |
We now show that $\phi\circ\psi$ and $\psi\circ\phi$ are homotopic to the identity. |
|
148 |
||
149 |
$\psi\circ\phi$ is the identity. $\phi$ takes a blob diagram $a$ and chops it into pieces |
|
150 |
according to some decomposition $K$ of $Y$. |
|
151 |
$\psi$ glues those pieces back together, yielding the same $a$ we started with. |
|
152 |
||
153 |
$\phi\circ\psi$ is the identity up to homotopy by another MoAM argument... |
|
154 |
||
155 |
This concludes the proof of Theorem \ref{product_thm}. |
|
156 |
\nn{at least I think it does; it's pretty rough at this point.} |
|
113 | 157 |
\end{proof} |
158 |
||
159 |
\nn{need to say something about dim $< n$ above} |
|
160 |
||
123 | 161 |
\medskip |
113 | 162 |
|
123 | 163 |
\begin{cor} |
164 |
The new-fangled and old-fashioned blob complexes are homotopic. |
|
165 |
\end{cor} |
|
166 |
\begin{proof} |
|
167 |
Apply Theorem \ref{product_thm} with the fiber $F$ equal to a point. |
|
168 |
\end{proof} |
|
113 | 169 |
|
170 |
\medskip |
|
171 |
\hrule |
|
172 |
\medskip |
|
173 |
||
174 |
\nn{to be continued...} |
|
175 |
\medskip |
|
176 |