author | Kevin Walker <kevin@canyon23.net> |
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:24 -0700 | |
changeset 547 | fbad527790c1 |
parent 378 | e5867a64cae5 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
153 | 1 |
% use options |
2 |
% '[beamer]' for a digital projector |
|
3 |
% '[trans]' for an overhead projector |
|
4 |
% '[handout]' for 4-up printed notes |
|
170 | 5 |
\documentclass[beamer, compress]{beamer} |
153 | 6 |
|
7 |
% change talk_preamble if you want to modify the slide theme, colours, and settings for trans and handout modes. |
|
8 |
\newcommand{\pathtotrunk}{../../} |
|
9 |
\input{\pathtotrunk talks/talk_preamble.tex} |
|
10 |
||
11 |
%\setbeameroption{previous slide on second screen=right} |
|
12 |
||
13 |
\author[Scott Morrison]{Scott Morrison \\ \texttt{http://tqft.net/} \\ joint work with Kevin Walker} |
|
156 | 14 |
\institute{UC Berkeley / Miller Institute for Basic Research} |
153 | 15 |
\title{Blob homology, part $\mathbb{I}$} |
176 | 16 |
\date{Homotopy Theory and Higher Algebraic Structures, UC Riverside, November 10 2009 \\ \begin{description}\item[slides, part $\mathbb{I}$:]\url{http://tqft.net/UCR-blobs1} \item[slides, part $\mathbb{II}$:]\url{http://tqft.net/UCR-blobs2} \item[draft:]\url{http://tqft.net/blobs}\end{description}} |
153 | 17 |
|
18 |
\begin{document} |
|
19 |
||
20 |
\frame{\titlepage} |
|
21 |
||
22 |
\beamertemplatetransparentcovered |
|
23 |
||
24 |
\mode<beamer>{\setbeamercolor{block title}{bg=green!40!black}} |
|
25 |
||
26 |
\beamersetuncovermixins |
|
27 |
{\opaqueness<1->{60}} |
|
28 |
{} |
|
29 |
||
30 |
||
31 |
||
32 |
\section{Overview} |
|
33 |
||
34 |
\begin{frame}<beamer> |
|
170 | 35 |
\frametitle{Blob homology} |
36 |
\begin{quote} |
|
37 |
... homotopical topology and TQFT have grown so close that I have started thinking that they are turning into the language of new foundations. |
|
38 |
\end{quote} |
|
39 |
\flushright{--- \href{http://www.ams.org/notices/200910/rtx091001268p.pdf}{Yuri Manin, September 2008}} |
|
40 |
\tableofcontents |
|
41 |
\end{frame} |
|
153 | 42 |
|
43 |
\begin{frame}{What is \emph{blob homology}?} |
|
44 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
157 | 45 |
The blob complex takes an $n$-manifold $\cM$ and an `$n$-category with strong duality' $\cC$ and produces a chain complex, $\bc_*(\cM; \cC)$. |
46 |
\end{block} |
|
47 |
\tikzstyle{description}=[gray, font=\tiny, text centered, text width=2cm] |
|
48 |
\begin{tikzpicture}[] |
|
49 |
\setbeamercovered{% |
|
50 |
transparent=5, |
|
51 |
% still covered={\opaqueness<1>{15}\opaqueness<2>{10}\opaqueness<3>{5}\opaqueness<4->{2}}, |
|
52 |
again covered={\opaqueness<1->{50}} |
|
53 |
} |
|
54 |
||
55 |
\node[red] (blobs) at (0,0) {$H(\bc_*(\cM; \cC))$}; |
|
56 |
\uncover<1>{ |
|
176 | 57 |
\node[blue] (skein) at (4,0) {$\cA(\cM; \cC)$}; |
157 | 58 |
\node[below=5pt, description] (skein-label) at (skein) {(the usual TQFT Hilbert space)}; |
59 |
\path[->](blobs) edge node[above] {$*= 0$} (skein); |
|
60 |
} |
|
61 |
||
62 |
\uncover<2>{ |
|
63 |
\node[blue] (hoch) at (0,3) {$HH_*(\cC)$}; |
|
64 |
\node[right=20pt, description] (hoch-label) at (hoch) {(the Hochschild homology)}; |
|
65 |
\path[->](blobs) edge node[right] {$\cM = S^1$} (hoch); |
|
66 |
} |
|
67 |
||
68 |
\uncover<3>{ |
|
69 |
\node[blue] (comm) at (-2.4, -1.8) {$H_*(\Delta^\infty(\cM), k)$}; |
|
70 |
\node[description, below=5pt] (comm-label) at (comm) {(singular homology of the infinite configuration space)}; |
|
71 |
\path[->](blobs) edge node[right=5pt] {$\cC = k[t]$} (comm); |
|
72 |
} |
|
73 |
||
74 |
\end{tikzpicture} |
|
75 |
\end{frame} |
|
76 |
||
77 |
\begin{frame}{$n$-categories} |
|
78 |
\begin{block}{Defining $n$-categories is fraught with difficulties} |
|
79 |
I'm not going to go into details; I'll draw $2$-dimensional pictures, and rely on your intuition for pivotal $2$-categories. |
|
80 |
\end{block} |
|
81 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
170 | 82 |
Kevin's talk (part $\mathbb{II}$) will explain the notions of `topological $n$-categories' and `$A_\infty$ $n$-categories'. |
83 |
\end{block} |
|
84 |
||
85 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
157 | 86 |
\begin{itemize} |
87 |
\item |
|
88 |
Defining $n$-categories: a choice of `shape' for morphisms. |
|
89 |
\item |
|
90 |
We allow all shapes! A vector space for every ball. |
|
91 |
\item |
|
92 |
`Strong duality' is integral in our definition. |
|
93 |
\end{itemize} |
|
94 |
\end{block} |
|
95 |
\end{frame} |
|
96 |
||
170 | 97 |
\newcommand{\roundframe}[1]{\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=-2pt]\node[rectangle,inner sep=1pt,rounded corners,fill=white] {#1};\end{tikzpicture}} |
157 | 98 |
|
170 | 99 |
\section{Definition} |
157 | 100 |
\begin{frame}{Fields and pasting diagrams} |
101 |
\begin{block}{Pasting diagrams} |
|
102 |
Fix an $n$-category with strong duality $\cC$. A \emph{field} on $\cM$ is a pasting diagram drawn on $\cM$, with cells labelled by morphisms from $\cC$. |
|
153 | 103 |
\end{block} |
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
104 |
\begin{example}[$\cC = \text{TL}_d$ the Temperley-Lieb category] |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
105 |
$$\roundframe{\mathfig{0.35}{definition/example-pasting-diagram}} \in \cF^{\text{TL}_d}\left(T^2\right)$$ |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
106 |
\end{example} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
107 |
\begin{block}{} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
108 |
Given a pasting diagram on a ball, we can evaluate it to a morphism. We call the kernel the \emph{null fields}. |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
109 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
110 |
$$\text{ev}\Bigg(\roundframe{\mathfig{0.12}{definition/evaluation1}} - \frac{1}{d}\roundframe{\mathfig{0.12}{definition/evaluation2}}\Bigg) = 0$$ |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
111 |
\end{block} |
157 | 112 |
\end{frame} |
113 |
||
176 | 114 |
\begin{frame}{Background: TQFT invariants} |
115 |
\begin{defn} |
|
116 |
A decapitated $n+1$-dimensional TQFT associates a vector space $\cA(\cM)$ to each $n$-manifold $\cM$. |
|
117 |
\end{defn} |
|
118 |
(`decapitated': no numerical invariants of $n+1$-manifolds.) |
|
119 |
||
120 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
121 |
If the manifold has boundary, we get a category. Objects are boundary data, $\Hom{\cA(\cM)}{x}{y} = \cA(\cM; x,y)$. |
|
122 |
\end{block} |
|
123 |
||
124 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
125 |
We want to extend `all the way down'. The $k$-category associated to the $n-k$-manifold $\cY$ is $\cA(\cY \times B^k)$. |
|
126 |
\end{block} |
|
127 |
||
128 |
\begin{defn} |
|
129 |
Given an $n$-category $\cC$, the associated TQFT is |
|
130 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
|
131 |
$$\cA(\cM) = \cF(M) / \ker{ev},$$ |
|
132 |
||
133 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
|
134 |
fields modulo fields which evaluate to zero inside some ball. |
|
135 |
\end{defn} |
|
136 |
\end{frame} |
|
137 |
||
157 | 138 |
\begin{frame}{\emph{Definition} of the blob complex, $k=0,1$} |
139 |
\begin{block}{Motivation} |
|
176 | 140 |
A \emph{local} construction, such that when $\cM$ is a ball, $\bc_*(\cM; \cC)$ is a resolution of $\cA(\cM,; \cC)$. |
157 | 141 |
\end{block} |
142 |
||
143 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
144 |
\center |
|
170 | 145 |
$\bc_0(\cM; \cC) = \cF(\cM)$, arbitrary pasting diagrams on $\cM$. |
157 | 146 |
\end{block} |
147 |
||
148 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
149 |
\vspace{-1mm} |
|
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
150 |
$$\bc_1(\cM; \cC) = \Complex\setcr{(B, u, r)}{\begin{array}{c}\text{$B$ an embedded ball}\\\text{$u \in \cF(B)$ in the kernel}\\ r \in \cF(\cM \setminus B)\end{array}}.$$ |
157 | 151 |
\end{block} |
152 |
\vspace{-3.5mm} |
|
153 |
$$\mathfig{.5}{definition/single-blob}$$ |
|
154 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
|
155 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
156 |
\vspace{-6mm} |
|
157 |
\begin{align*} |
|
158 |
d_1 : (B, u, r) & \mapsto u \circ r & \bc_0 / \im(d_1) \iso A(\cM; \cC) |
|
159 |
\end{align*} |
|
160 |
\end{block} |
|
161 |
\end{frame} |
|
162 |
||
163 |
\begin{frame}{Definition, $k=2$} |
|
164 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
165 |
\vspace{-1mm} |
|
166 |
$$\bc_2 = \bc_2^{\text{disjoint}} \oplus \bc_2^{\text{nested}}$$ |
|
167 |
\end{block} |
|
168 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
169 |
\vspace{-5mm} |
|
170 |
\begin{align*} |
|
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
171 |
\bc_2^{\text{disjoint}} & = \Complex\setcl{\roundframe{\mathfig{0.5}{definition/disjoint-blobs}}}{\text{ev}_{B_i}(u_i) = 0} |
157 | 172 |
\end{align*} |
173 |
\vspace{-4mm} |
|
174 |
$$d_2 : (B_1, B_2, u_1, u_2, r) \mapsto (B_2, u_2, r \circ u_1) - (B_1, u_1, r \circ u_2)$$ |
|
175 |
\end{block} |
|
176 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
177 |
\vspace{-5mm} |
|
178 |
\begin{align*} |
|
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
179 |
\bc_2^{\text{nested}} & = \Complex\setcl{\roundframe{\mathfig{0.5}{definition/nested-blobs}}}{\text{ev}_{B_1}(u)=0} |
157 | 180 |
\end{align*} |
181 |
\vspace{-4mm} |
|
182 |
$$d_2 : (B_1, B_2, u, r', r) \mapsto (B_2, u \circ r', r) - (B_1, u, r \circ r')$$ |
|
183 |
\end{block} |
|
153 | 184 |
\end{frame} |
185 |
||
170 | 186 |
\begin{frame}{Definition, general case} |
187 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
188 |
$$\bc_k = \Complex\set{\roundframe{\mathfig{0.7}{definition/k-blobs}}}$$ |
170 | 189 |
$k$ blobs, properly nested or disjoint, with ``innermost'' blobs labelled by pasting diagrams that evaluate to zero. |
190 |
\end{block} |
|
191 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
192 |
\vspace{-2mm} |
|
193 |
$$d_k : \bc_k \to \bc_{k-1} = {\textstyle \sum_i} (-1)^i (\text{erase blob $i$})$$ |
|
194 |
\end{block} |
|
195 |
\end{frame} |
|
196 |
||
197 |
\section{Properties} |
|
176 | 198 |
\begin{frame}{Hochschild homology} |
199 |
\begin{block}{TQFT on $S^1$ is `coinvariants'} |
|
200 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
|
201 |
$$\cA(S^1, A) = \Complex\set{\roundframe{\mathfig{0.1}{hochschild/m-a-b}}}\scalebox{2}{$/$}\set{\roundframe{\mathfig{0.065}{hochschild/ma}} - \roundframe{\mathfig{0.12}{hochschild/m-a}}} = A/(ab-ba)$$ |
|
202 |
\end{block} |
|
203 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
204 |
The Hochschild complex is `coinvariants of the bar resolution' |
|
205 |
\vspace{-2mm} |
|
206 |
$$ \cdots \to A \tensor A \tensor A \to A \tensor A \xrightarrow{m \tensor a \mapsto ma-am} A$$ |
|
207 |
\end{block} |
|
208 |
\begin{thm}[$ \HC_*(A) \iso \bc_*(S^1; A)$] |
|
209 |
$$m \tensor a \mapsto |
|
210 |
\roundframe{\mathfig{0.35}{hochschild/1-chains}} |
|
211 |
$$ |
|
212 |
\vspace{-5mm} |
|
213 |
\begin{align*} |
|
214 |
u_1 & = \mathfig{0.05}{hochschild/u_1-1} - \mathfig{0.05}{hochschild/u_1-2} & u_2 &= \mathfig{0.05}{hochschild/u_2-1} - \mathfig{0.05}{hochschild/u_2-2} |
|
215 |
\end{align*} |
|
216 |
\end{thm} |
|
217 |
\end{frame} |
|
218 |
||
170 | 219 |
\begin{frame}{An action of $\CH{\cM}$} |
220 |
\begin{thm} |
|
221 |
There's a chain map |
|
222 |
$$\CH{\cM} \tensor \bc_*(\cM) \to \bc_*(\cM).$$ |
|
223 |
which is associative up to homotopy, and compatible with gluing. |
|
224 |
\end{thm} |
|
225 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
226 |
Taking $H_0$, this is the mapping class group acting on a TQFT skein module. |
|
227 |
\end{block} |
|
228 |
\end{frame} |
|
229 |
||
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
230 |
\begin{frame}{Higher Deligne conjecture} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
231 |
\begin{block}{Deligne conjecture} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
232 |
Chains on the little discs operad acts on Hochschild cohomology. |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
233 |
\end{block} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
234 |
|
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
235 |
\begin{block}{} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
236 |
Call $\Hom{A_\infty}{\bc_*(\cM)}{\bc_*(\cM)}$ `blob cochains on $\cM$'. |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
237 |
\end{block} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
238 |
|
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
239 |
\begin{block}{Theorem* (Higher Deligne conjecture)} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
240 |
\scalebox{0.96}{Chains on the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad acts on blob cochains.} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
241 |
\vspace{-3mm} |
378
e5867a64cae5
moving files around for a talk in Stony Brook
Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
parents:
222
diff
changeset
|
242 |
$$\mathfig{.85}{deligne/manifolds}$$ |
222
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
243 |
\end{block} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
244 |
\end{frame} |
217b6a870532
committing changes from loon lake - mostly small blobs
scott@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760
parents:
180
diff
changeset
|
245 |
|
170 | 246 |
\begin{frame}{Gluing} |
247 |
\begin{block}{$\bc_*(Y \times [0,1])$ is naturally an $A_\infty$ category} |
|
248 |
\begin{itemize} |
|
249 |
\item[$m_2$:] gluing $[0,1] \simeq [0,1] \cup [0,1]$ |
|
250 |
\item[$m_k$:] reparametrising $[0,1]$ |
|
251 |
\end{itemize} |
|
252 |
\end{block} |
|
253 |
\begin{block}{} |
|
254 |
If $Y \subset \bdy X$ then $\bc_*(X)$ is an $A_\infty$ module over $\bc_*(Y)$. |
|
255 |
\end{block} |
|
256 |
\begin{thm}[Gluing formula] |
|
257 |
When $Y \sqcup Y^{\text{op}} \subset \bdy X$, |
|
258 |
\vspace{-5mm} |
|
259 |
\[ |
|
260 |
\bc_*(X \bigcup_Y \selfarrow) \iso \bc_*(X) \bigotimes_{\bc_*(Y)}^{A_\infty} \selfarrow. |
|
261 |
\] |
|
262 |
\end{thm} |
|
263 |
In principle, we can compute blob homology from a handle decomposition, by iterated Hochschild homology. |
|
264 |
\end{frame} |
|
153 | 265 |
\end{document} |
266 |
% ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
267 |