text/appendixes/famodiff.tex
changeset 892 01c1daa71437
parent 891 52e6b2d78dc4
child 913 75c1e11d0f25
equal deleted inserted replaced
891:52e6b2d78dc4 892:01c1daa71437
    47  If $f$ is smooth, Lipschitz or PL, as appropriate, and $f(p, \cdot):X\to T$ is in $\cX$ for all $p \in P$
    47  If $f$ is smooth, Lipschitz or PL, as appropriate, and $f(p, \cdot):X\to T$ is in $\cX$ for all $p \in P$
    48 then $F(t, p, \cdot)$ is also in $\cX$ for all $t\in I$ and $p\in P$.
    48 then $F(t, p, \cdot)$ is also in $\cX$ for all $t\in I$ and $p\in P$.
    49 \end{enumerate}
    49 \end{enumerate}
    50 \end{lemma}
    50 \end{lemma}
    51 
    51 
    52 Note: We will prove a version of item 4 of Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} for topological
    52 %Note: We will prove a version of item 4 of Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} for topological
    53 homeomorphisms in Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma_2} below.
    53 %homeomorphisms in Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma_2} below.
    54 Since the proof is rather different we segregate it to a separate lemma.
    54 %Since the proof is rather different we segregate it to a separate lemma.
    55 
    55 
    56 \begin{proof}
    56 \begin{proof}
    57 Our homotopy will have the form
    57 Our homotopy will have the form
    58 \eqar{
    58 \eqar{
    59     F: I \times P \times X &\to& X \\
    59     F: I \times P \times X &\to& X \\
   219 \end{proof}
   219 \end{proof}
   220 
   220 
   221 
   221 
   222 % Edwards-Kirby: MR0283802
   222 % Edwards-Kirby: MR0283802
   223 
   223 
       
   224 \noop { %%%%%% begin \noop %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
       
   225 
   224 The above proof doesn't work for homeomorphisms which are merely continuous.
   226 The above proof doesn't work for homeomorphisms which are merely continuous.
   225 The $k=1$ case for plain, continuous homeomorphisms 
   227 The $k=1$ case for plain, continuous homeomorphisms 
   226 is more or less equivalent to Corollary 1.3 of \cite{MR0283802}.
   228 is more or less equivalent to Corollary 1.3 of \cite{MR0283802}.
   227 The proof found in \cite{MR0283802} of that corollary can be adapted to many-parameter families of
   229 The proof found in \cite{MR0283802} of that corollary can be adapted to many-parameter families of
   228 homeomorphisms:
   230 homeomorphisms:
   344 To apply Theorem 5.1 of \cite{MR0283802}, the family $f(P)$ must be sufficiently small,
   346 To apply Theorem 5.1 of \cite{MR0283802}, the family $f(P)$ must be sufficiently small,
   345 and the subdivision mentioned above is chosen fine enough to insure this.
   347 and the subdivision mentioned above is chosen fine enough to insure this.
   346 
   348 
   347 \end{proof}
   349 \end{proof}
   348 
   350 
   349 
   351 } %%%%%% end \noop %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
   350 
   352 
   351 \begin{lemma} \label{extension_lemma_c}
   353 \begin{lemma} \label{extension_lemma_c}
   352 Let $\cX_*$ be any of $C_*(\Maps(X \to T))$ or singular chains on the 
   354 Let $\cX_*$ be any of $C_*(\Maps(X \to T))$ or singular chains on the 
   353 subspace of $\Maps(X\to T)$ consisting of immersions, diffeomorphisms, 
   355 subspace of $\Maps(X\to T)$ consisting of immersions, diffeomorphisms, 
   354 bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms, PL homeomorphisms or plain old continuous homeomorphisms.
   356 bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms, or PL homeomorphisms.
   355 Let $G_* \subset \cX_*$ denote the chains adapted to an open cover $\cU$
   357 Let $G_* \subset \cX_*$ denote the chains adapted to an open cover $\cU$
   356 of $X$.
   358 of $X$.
   357 Then $G_*$ is a strong deformation retract of $\cX_*$.
   359 Then $G_*$ is a strong deformation retract of $\cX_*$.
   358 \end{lemma}
   360 \end{lemma}
   359 \begin{proof}
   361 \begin{proof}
   360 It suffices to show that given a generator $f:P\times X\to T$ of $\cX_k$ with
   362 It suffices to show that given a generator $f:P\times X\to T$ of $\cX_k$ with
   361 $\bd f \in G_{k-1}$ there exists $h\in \cX_{k+1}$ with $\bd h = f + g$ and $g \in G_k$.
   363 $\bd f \in G_{k-1}$ there exists $h\in \cX_{k+1}$ with $\bd h = f + g$ and $g \in G_k$.
   362 This is exactly what Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} (or \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma_2})
   364 This is exactly what Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma}
   363 gives us.
   365 gives us.
   364 More specifically, let $\bd P = \sum Q_i$, with each $Q_i\in G_{k-1}$.
   366 More specifically, let $\bd P = \sum Q_i$, with each $Q_i\in G_{k-1}$.
   365 Let $F: I\times P\times X\to T$ be the homotopy constructed in Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma}.
   367 Let $F: I\times P\times X\to T$ be the homotopy constructed in Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma}.
   366 Then $\bd F$ is equal to $f$ plus $F(1, \cdot, \cdot)$ plus the restrictions of $F$ to $I\times Q_i$.
   368 Then $\bd F$ is equal to $f$ plus $F(1, \cdot, \cdot)$ plus the restrictions of $F$ to $I\times Q_i$.
   367 Part 2 of Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} says that $F(1, \cdot, \cdot)\in G_k$,
   369 Part 2 of Lemma \ref{basic_adaptation_lemma} says that $F(1, \cdot, \cdot)\in G_k$,