pnas/pnas.tex
changeset 586 0510346848ed
parent 585 e2996d7b4e6c
child 587 38ec3d05d0d8
equal deleted inserted replaced
585:e2996d7b4e6c 586:0510346848ed
   220 \label{axiom:morphisms}
   220 \label{axiom:morphisms}
   221 For each $0 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
   221 For each $0 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
   222 the category of $k$-balls and 
   222 the category of $k$-balls and 
   223 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
   223 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
   224 \end{axiom}
   224 \end{axiom}
       
   225 
       
   226 Note that the functoriality in the above axiom allows us to operate via
       
   227 homeomorphisms which are not the identity on the boundary of the $k$-ball.
       
   228 The action of these homeomorphisms gives the ``strong duality" structure.
   225 
   229 
   226 Next we consider domains and ranges of $k$-morphisms.
   230 Next we consider domains and ranges of $k$-morphisms.
   227 Because we assume strong duality, it doesn't make much sense to subdivide the boundary of a morphism
   231 Because we assume strong duality, it doesn't make much sense to subdivide the boundary of a morphism
   228 into domain and range --- the duality operations can convert domain to range and vice-versa.
   232 into domain and range --- the duality operations can convert domain to range and vice-versa.
   229 Instead, we will use a unified domain/range, which we will call a ``boundary".
   233 Instead, we will use a unified domain/range, which we will call a ``boundary".