text/definitions.tex
changeset 132 15a34e2f3b39
parent 117 b62214646c4f
child 139 57291331fd82
equal deleted inserted replaced
131:f8d909559d19 132:15a34e2f3b39
     1 %!TEX root = ../blob1.tex
     1 %!TEX root = ../blob1.tex
     2 
     2 
     3 \section{Definitions}
     3 \section{TQFTs via fields}
     4 \label{sec:definitions}
     4 %\label{sec:definitions}
     5 
     5 
     6 \nn{this section is a bit out of date; needs to be updated 
     6 In this section we review the construction of TQFTs from ``topological fields".
     7 to fit with $n$-category definition given later}
     7 For more details see xxxx.
     8 
     8 
     9 \subsection{Systems of fields}
     9 \subsection{Systems of fields}
    10 \label{sec:fields}
    10 \label{sec:fields}
    11 
    11 
    12 Let $\cM_k$ denote the category (groupoid, in fact) with objects 
    12 Let $\cM_k$ denote the category with objects 
    13 oriented PL manifolds of dimension
    13 unoriented PL manifolds of dimension
    14 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
    14 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
    15 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
    15 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
    16 unoriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
    16 oriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
    17 will stick with oriented PL.)
    17 will stick with unoriented PL.)
    18 
    18 
    19 Fix a top dimension $n$, and a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$ whose objects are sets. While reading the definition, you should just think about the case $\cS = \Set$ with cartesian product, until you reach the discussion of a \emph{linear system of fields} later in this section, where $\cS = \Vect$, and \S \ref{sec:homological-fields}, where $\cS = \Kom$.
    19 %Fix a top dimension $n$, and a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$ whose objects are sets. While reading the definition, you should just think about the case $\cS = \Set$ with cartesian product, until you reach the discussion of a \emph{linear system of fields} later in this section, where $\cS = \Vect$, and \S \ref{sec:homological-fields}, where $\cS = \Kom$.
    20 
    20 
    21 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$
    21 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$
    22 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$
    22 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$
    23 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
    23 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
    24 
    24 
    43 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
    43 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
    44 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
    44 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
    45 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
    45 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
    46 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
    46 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
    47 \item The subset $\cC_n(X;c)$ of top fields with a given boundary condition is an object in our symmetric monoidal category $\cS$. (This condition is of course trivial when $\cS = \Set$.) If the objects are sets with extra structure (e.g. $\cS = \Vect$ or $\Kom$), then this extra structure is considered part of the definition of $\cC_n$. Any maps mentioned below between top level fields must be morphisms in $\cS$.
    47 \item The subset $\cC_n(X;c)$ of top fields with a given boundary condition is an object in our symmetric monoidal category $\cS$. (This condition is of course trivial when $\cS = \Set$.) If the objects are sets with extra structure (e.g. $\cS = \Vect$ or $\Kom$), then this extra structure is considered part of the definition of $\cC_n$. Any maps mentioned below between top level fields must be morphisms in $\cS$.
    48 \item There are orientation reversal maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC_k(-X)$, and these maps
       
    49 again comprise a natural transformation of functors.
       
    50 In addition, the orientation reversal maps are compatible with the boundary restriction maps.
       
    51 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
    48 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
    52 structures on $\cM_k$, $\Set$ and $\cS$: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
    49 structures on $\cM_k$, $\Set$ and $\cS$: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
    53 compatibly with homeomorphisms, restriction to boundary, and orientation reversal.
    50 compatibly with homeomorphisms, restriction to boundary, and orientation reversal.
    54 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
    51 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
    55 restriction maps.
    52 restriction maps.
    68 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
    65 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
    69 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
    66 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
    70 the gluing map is surjective.
    67 the gluing map is surjective.
    71 From the point of view of $X\sgl$ and the image $Y \subset X\sgl$ of the 
    68 From the point of view of $X\sgl$ and the image $Y \subset X\sgl$ of the 
    72 gluing surface, we say that fields in the image of the gluing map
    69 gluing surface, we say that fields in the image of the gluing map
    73 are transverse to $Y$ or cuttable along $Y$.
    70 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
    74 \item Gluing with corners.
    71 \item Gluing with corners.
    75 Let $\bd X = Y \cup -Y \cup W$, where $\pm Y$ and $W$ might intersect along their boundaries.
    72 Let $\bd X = Y \cup -Y \cup W$, where $\pm Y$ and $W$ might intersect along their boundaries.
    76 Let $X\sgl$ denote $X$ glued to itself along $\pm Y$.
    73 Let $X\sgl$ denote $X$ glued to itself along $\pm Y$.
    77 Note that $\bd X\sgl = W\sgl$, where $W\sgl$ denotes $W$ glued to itself
    74 Note that $\bd X\sgl = W\sgl$, where $W\sgl$ denotes $W$ glued to itself
    78 (without corners) along two copies of $\bd Y$.
    75 (without corners) along two copies of $\bd Y$.
    79 Let $c\sgl \in \cC_{k-1}(W\sgl)$ be a be a cuttable field on $W\sgl$ and let
    76 Let $c\sgl \in \cC_{k-1}(W\sgl)$ be a be a splittable field on $W\sgl$ and let
    80 $c \in \cC_{k-1}(W)$ be the cut open version of $c\sgl$.
    77 $c \in \cC_{k-1}(W)$ be the cut open version of $c\sgl$.
    81 Let $\cC^c_k(X)$ denote the subset of $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$ on $W$.
    78 Let $\cC^c_k(X)$ denote the subset of $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$ on $W$.
    82 (This restriction map uses the gluing without corners map above.)
    79 (This restriction map uses the gluing without corners map above.)
    83 Using the boundary restriction, gluing without corners, and (in one case) orientation reversal
    80 Using the boundary restriction, gluing without corners, and (in one case) orientation reversal
    84 maps, we get two maps $\cC^c_k(X) \to \cC(Y)$, corresponding to the two
    81 maps, we get two maps $\cC^c_k(X) \to \cC(Y)$, corresponding to the two
    92 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
    89 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
    93 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
    90 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
    94 the gluing map is surjective.
    91 the gluing map is surjective.
    95 From the point of view of $X\sgl$ and the image $Y \subset X\sgl$ of the 
    92 From the point of view of $X\sgl$ and the image $Y \subset X\sgl$ of the 
    96 gluing surface, we say that fields in the image of the gluing map
    93 gluing surface, we say that fields in the image of the gluing map
    97 are transverse to $Y$ or cuttable along $Y$.
    94 are transverse to $Y$ or splittable along $Y$.
    98 \item There are maps $\cC_{k-1}(Y) \to \cC_k(Y \times I)$, denoted
    95 \item There are maps $\cC_{k-1}(Y) \to \cC_k(Y \times I)$, denoted
    99 $c \mapsto c\times I$.
    96 $c \mapsto c\times I$.
   100 These maps comprise a natural transformation of functors, and commute appropriately
    97 These maps comprise a natural transformation of functors, and commute appropriately
   101 with all the structure maps above (disjoint union, boundary restriction, etc.).
    98 with all the structure maps above (disjoint union, boundary restriction, etc.).
   102 Furthermore, if $f: Y\times I \to Y\times I$ is a fiber-preserving homeomorphism
    99 Furthermore, if $f: Y\times I \to Y\times I$ is a fiber-preserving homeomorphism
   109 Using the functoriality and $\bullet\times I$ properties above, together
   106 Using the functoriality and $\bullet\times I$ properties above, together
   110 with boundary collar homeomorphisms of manifolds, we can define the notion of 
   107 with boundary collar homeomorphisms of manifolds, we can define the notion of 
   111 {\it extended isotopy}.
   108 {\it extended isotopy}.
   112 Let $M$ be an $n$-manifold and $Y \subset \bd M$ be a codimension zero submanifold
   109 Let $M$ be an $n$-manifold and $Y \subset \bd M$ be a codimension zero submanifold
   113 of $\bd M$.
   110 of $\bd M$.
   114 Let $x \in \cC(M)$ be a field on $M$ and such that $\bd x$ is cuttable along $\bd Y$.
   111 Let $x \in \cC(M)$ be a field on $M$ and such that $\bd x$ is splittable along $\bd Y$.
   115 Let $c$ be $x$ restricted to $Y$.
   112 Let $c$ be $x$ restricted to $Y$.
   116 Let $M \cup (Y\times I)$ denote $M$ glued to $Y\times I$ along $Y$.
   113 Let $M \cup (Y\times I)$ denote $M$ glued to $Y\times I$ along $Y$.
   117 Then we have the glued field $x \bullet (c\times I)$ on $M \cup (Y\times I)$.
   114 Then we have the glued field $x \bullet (c\times I)$ on $M \cup (Y\times I)$.
   118 Let $f: M \cup (Y\times I) \to M$ be a collaring homeomorphism.
   115 Let $f: M \cup (Y\times I) \to M$ be a collaring homeomorphism.
   119 Then we say that $x$ is {\it extended isotopic} to $f(x \bullet (c\times I))$.
   116 Then we say that $x$ is {\it extended isotopic} to $f(x \bullet (c\times I))$.
   121 on $M$ generated by isotopy plus all instance of the above construction
   118 on $M$ generated by isotopy plus all instance of the above construction
   122 (for all appropriate $Y$ and $x$).
   119 (for all appropriate $Y$ and $x$).
   123 
   120 
   124 \nn{should also say something about pseudo-isotopy}
   121 \nn{should also say something about pseudo-isotopy}
   125 
   122 
   126 %\bigskip
       
   127 %\hrule
       
   128 %\bigskip
       
   129 %
       
   130 %\input{text/fields.tex}
       
   131 %
       
   132 %
       
   133 %\bigskip
       
   134 %\hrule
       
   135 %\bigskip
       
   136 
       
   137 \nn{note: probably will suppress from notation the distinction
       
   138 between fields and their (orientation-reversal) duals}
       
   139 
   123 
   140 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   124 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   141 then we will soon linearize them(?)}
   125 then we will soon linearize them(?)}
   142 
   126 
   143 We now describe in more detail systems of fields coming from sub-cell-complexes labeled
   127 We now describe in more detail systems of fields coming from sub-cell-complexes labeled
   289 $\lf(B; c) \to \mor(c', c'')$, where $(c', c'')$ is some (any) division of $c$ into
   273 $\lf(B; c) \to \mor(c', c'')$, where $(c', c'')$ is some (any) division of $c$ into
   290 domain and range.
   274 domain and range.
   291 
   275 
   292 \nn{maybe examples of local relations before general def?}
   276 \nn{maybe examples of local relations before general def?}
   293 
   277 
       
   278 \subsection{Constructing a TQFT}
       
   279 
       
   280 \nn{need to expand this; use $\bc_0/\bc_1$ notation (maybe); also introduce
       
   281 cylinder categories and gluing formula}
       
   282 
   294 Given a system of fields and local relations, we define the skein space
   283 Given a system of fields and local relations, we define the skein space
   295 $A(Y^n; c)$ to be the space of all finite linear combinations of fields on
   284 $A(Y^n; c)$ to be the space of all finite linear combinations of fields on
   296 the $n$-manifold $Y$ modulo local relations.
   285 the $n$-manifold $Y$ modulo local relations.
   297 The Hilbert space $Z(Y; c)$ for the TQFT based on the fields and local relations
   286 The Hilbert space $Z(Y; c)$ for the TQFT based on the fields and local relations
   298 is defined to be the dual of $A(Y; c)$.
   287 is defined to be the dual of $A(Y; c)$.
   302 
   291 
   303 The blob complex is in some sense the derived version of $A(Y; c)$.
   292 The blob complex is in some sense the derived version of $A(Y; c)$.
   304 
   293 
   305 
   294 
   306 
   295 
   307 \subsection{The blob complex}
   296 \section{The blob complex}
   308 \label{sec:blob-definition}
   297 \label{sec:blob-definition}
   309 
   298 
   310 Let $X$ be an $n$-manifold.
   299 Let $X$ be an $n$-manifold.
   311 Assume a fixed system of fields and local relations.
   300 Assume a fixed system of fields and local relations.
   312 In this section we will usually suppress boundary conditions on $X$ from the notation
   301 In this section we will usually suppress boundary conditions on $X$ from the notation
   377 
   366 
   378 A nested 2-blob diagram consists of
   367 A nested 2-blob diagram consists of
   379 \begin{itemize}
   368 \begin{itemize}
   380 \item A pair of nested balls (blobs) $B_0 \sub B_1 \sub X$.
   369 \item A pair of nested balls (blobs) $B_0 \sub B_1 \sub X$.
   381 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin B_0; c_0)$
   370 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin B_0; c_0)$
   382 (for some $c_0 \in \cC(\bd B_0)$), which is cuttable along $\bd B_1$.
   371 (for some $c_0 \in \cC(\bd B_0)$), which is splittable along $\bd B_1$.
   383 \item A local relation field $u_0 \in U(B_0; c_0)$.
   372 \item A local relation field $u_0 \in U(B_0; c_0)$.
   384 \end{itemize}
   373 \end{itemize}
   385 Let $r = r_1 \bullet r'$, where $r_1 \in \cC(B_1 \setmin B_0; c_0, c_1)$
   374 Let $r = r_1 \bullet r'$, where $r_1 \in \cC(B_1 \setmin B_0; c_0, c_1)$
   386 (for some $c_1 \in \cC(B_1)$) and
   375 (for some $c_1 \in \cC(B_1)$) and
   387 $r' \in \cC(X \setmin B_1; c_1)$.
   376 $r' \in \cC(X \setmin B_1; c_1)$.
   406 	&& \bigoplus \left( 
   395 	&& \bigoplus \left( 
   407 		\bigoplus_{B_0 \subset B_1} \bigoplus_{c_0}
   396 		\bigoplus_{B_0 \subset B_1} \bigoplus_{c_0}
   408 			U(B_0; c_0) \otimes \lf(X\setmin B_0; c_0)
   397 			U(B_0; c_0) \otimes \lf(X\setmin B_0; c_0)
   409 	\right) .
   398 	\right) .
   410 \end{eqnarray*}
   399 \end{eqnarray*}
   411 The final $\lf(X\setmin B_0; c_0)$ above really means fields cuttable along $\bd B_1$,
   400 The final $\lf(X\setmin B_0; c_0)$ above really means fields splittable along $\bd B_1$,
   412 but we didn't feel like introducing a notation for that.
   401 but we didn't feel like introducing a notation for that.
   413 For the disjoint blobs, reversing the ordering of $B_0$ and $B_1$ introduces a minus sign
   402 For the disjoint blobs, reversing the ordering of $B_0$ and $B_1$ introduces a minus sign
   414 (rather than a new, linearly independent 2-blob diagram).
   403 (rather than a new, linearly independent 2-blob diagram).
   415 
   404 
   416 Now for the general case.
   405 Now for the general case.
   428 $c_i$ and $c_j$ must have identical restrictions to $\bd B_i \cap \bd B_j$
   417 $c_i$ and $c_j$ must have identical restrictions to $\bd B_i \cap \bd B_j$
   429 if the latter space is not empty.
   418 if the latter space is not empty.
   430 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin B^t; c^t)$,
   419 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin B^t; c^t)$,
   431 where $B^t$ is the union of all the twig blobs and $c^t \in \cC(\bd B^t)$
   420 where $B^t$ is the union of all the twig blobs and $c^t \in \cC(\bd B^t)$
   432 is determined by the $c_i$'s.
   421 is determined by the $c_i$'s.
   433 $r$ is required to be cuttable along the boundaries of all blobs, twigs or not.
   422 $r$ is required to be splittable along the boundaries of all blobs, twigs or not.
   434 \item For each twig blob $B_j$ a local relation field $u_j \in U(B_j; c_j)$,
   423 \item For each twig blob $B_j$ a local relation field $u_j \in U(B_j; c_j)$,
   435 where $c_j$ is the restriction of $c^t$ to $\bd B_j$.
   424 where $c_j$ is the restriction of $c^t$ to $\bd B_j$.
   436 If $B_i = B_j$ then $u_i = u_j$.
   425 If $B_i = B_j$ then $u_i = u_j$.
   437 \end{itemize}
   426 \end{itemize}
   438 
   427 
   447 	\bc_k(X) \deq \bigoplus_{\overline{B}} \bigoplus_{\overline{c}}
   436 	\bc_k(X) \deq \bigoplus_{\overline{B}} \bigoplus_{\overline{c}}
   448 		\left( \otimes_j U(B_j; c_j)\right) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t) .
   437 		\left( \otimes_j U(B_j; c_j)\right) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t) .
   449 \]
   438 \]
   450 Here $\overline{B}$ runs over all configurations of blobs, satisfying the conditions above.
   439 Here $\overline{B}$ runs over all configurations of blobs, satisfying the conditions above.
   451 $\overline{c}$ runs over all boundary conditions, again as described above.
   440 $\overline{c}$ runs over all boundary conditions, again as described above.
   452 $j$ runs over all indices of twig blobs. The final $\lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t)$ must be interpreted as fields which are cuttable along all of the blobs in $\overline{B}$.
   441 $j$ runs over all indices of twig blobs. The final $\lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t)$ must be interpreted as fields which are splittable along all of the blobs in $\overline{B}$.
   453 
   442 
   454 The boundary map $\bd : \bc_k(X) \to \bc_{k-1}(X)$ is defined as follows.
   443 The boundary map $\bd : \bc_k(X) \to \bc_{k-1}(X)$ is defined as follows.
   455 Let $b = (\{B_i\}, \{u_j\}, r)$ be a $k$-blob diagram.
   444 Let $b = (\{B_i\}, \{u_j\}, r)$ be a $k$-blob diagram.
   456 Let $E_j(b)$ denote the result of erasing the $j$-th blob.
   445 Let $E_j(b)$ denote the result of erasing the $j$-th blob.
   457 If $B_j$ is not a twig blob, this involves only decrementing
   446 If $B_j$ is not a twig blob, this involves only decrementing