text/a_inf_blob.tex
changeset 342 1d76e832d32f
parent 337 f77cb464248e
child 355 dfefae16073c
equal deleted inserted replaced
341:675f53735445 342:1d76e832d32f
    14 new-fangled and old-fashioned blob complex.
    14 new-fangled and old-fashioned blob complex.
    15 
    15 
    16 \medskip
    16 \medskip
    17 
    17 
    18 An important technical tool in the proofs of this section is provided by the idea of `small blobs'.
    18 An important technical tool in the proofs of this section is provided by the idea of `small blobs'.
    19 Fix $\cU$, an open cover of $M$. Define the `small blob complex' $\bc^{\cU}_*(M)$ to be the subcomplex of $\bc_*(M)$ of all blob diagrams in which every blob is contained in some open set of $\cU$. 
    19 Fix $\cU$, an open cover of $M$.
       
    20 Define the `small blob complex' $\bc^{\cU}_*(M)$ to be the subcomplex of $\bc_*(M)$ of all blob diagrams in which every blob is contained in some open set of $\cU$. 
    20 \nn{KW: We need something a little stronger: Every blob diagram (even a 0-blob diagram) is splittable into pieces which are small w.r.t.\ $\cU$.
    21 \nn{KW: We need something a little stronger: Every blob diagram (even a 0-blob diagram) is splittable into pieces which are small w.r.t.\ $\cU$.
    21 If field have potentially large coupons/boxes, then this is a non-trivial constraint.
    22 If field have potentially large coupons/boxes, then this is a non-trivial constraint.
    22 On the other hand, we could probably get away with ignoring this point.
    23 On the other hand, we could probably get away with ignoring this point.
    23 Maybe the exposition will be better if we sweep this technical detail under the rug?}
    24 Maybe the exposition will be better if we sweep this technical detail under the rug?}
    24 
    25 
    44 }
    45 }
    45 
    46 
    46 \nn{need to settle on notation; proof and statement are inconsistent}
    47 \nn{need to settle on notation; proof and statement are inconsistent}
    47 
    48 
    48 \begin{thm} \label{product_thm}
    49 \begin{thm} \label{product_thm}
    49 Given a topological $n$-category $C$ and a $n{-}k$-manifold $F$, recall from Example \ref{ex:blob-complexes-of-balls} that there is an  $A_\infty$ $k$-category $C^{\times F}$ defined by
    50 Given a topological $n$-category $C$ and a $n{-}k$-manifold $F$, recall from 
       
    51 Example \ref{ex:blob-complexes-of-balls} that there is an  $A_\infty$ $k$-category $C^{\times F}$ defined by
    50 \begin{equation*}
    52 \begin{equation*}
    51 C^{\times F}(B) = \cB_*(B \times F, C).
    53 C^{\times F}(B) = \cB_*(B \times F, C).
    52 \end{equation*}
    54 \end{equation*}
    53 Now, given a $k$-manifold $Y$, there is a homotopy equivalence between the `old-fashioned' blob complex for $Y \times F$ with coefficients in $C$ and the `new-fangled' (i.e.\ homotopy colimit) blob complex for $Y$ with coefficients in $C^{\times F}$:
    55 Now, given a $k$-manifold $Y$, there is a homotopy equivalence between the `old-fashioned' 
       
    56 blob complex for $Y \times F$ with coefficients in $C$ and the `new-fangled' 
       
    57 (i.e.\ homotopy colimit) blob complex for $Y$ with coefficients in $C^{\times F}$:
    54 \begin{align*}
    58 \begin{align*}
    55 \cB_*(Y \times F, C) & \htpy \cB_*(Y, C^{\times F})
    59 \cB_*(Y \times F, C) & \htpy \cB_*(Y, C^{\times F})
    56 \end{align*}
    60 \end{align*}
    57 \end{thm}
    61 \end{thm}
    58 
    62 
   303 the proof of Theorem \ref{product_thm}.
   307 the proof of Theorem \ref{product_thm}.
   304 
   308 
   305 Let $\cT$ denote the chain complex $\bc(X_1) \otimes_{\bc(Y), J} \bc(X_2)$.
   309 Let $\cT$ denote the chain complex $\bc(X_1) \otimes_{\bc(Y), J} \bc(X_2)$.
   306 Recall that this is a homotopy colimit based on decompositions of the interval $J$.
   310 Recall that this is a homotopy colimit based on decompositions of the interval $J$.
   307 
   311 
   308 We define a map $\psi:\cT\to \bc_*(X)$.  On filtration degree zero summands it is given
   312 We define a map $\psi:\cT\to \bc_*(X)$.
       
   313 On filtration degree zero summands it is given
   309 by gluing the pieces together to get a blob diagram on $X$.
   314 by gluing the pieces together to get a blob diagram on $X$.
   310 On filtration degree 1 and greater $\psi$ is zero.
   315 On filtration degree 1 and greater $\psi$ is zero.
   311 
   316 
   312 The image of $\psi$ is the subcomplex $G_*\sub \bc(X)$ generated by blob diagrams which split
   317 The image of $\psi$ is the subcomplex $G_*\sub \bc(X)$ generated by blob diagrams which split
   313 over some decomposition of $J$.
   318 over some decomposition of $J$.
   351 Think of $\pi^\infty_{\leq n}(T)$ as encoding everything you would ever
   356 Think of $\pi^\infty_{\leq n}(T)$ as encoding everything you would ever
   352 want to know about spaces of maps of $k$-balls into $T$ ($k\le n$).
   357 want to know about spaces of maps of $k$-balls into $T$ ($k\le n$).
   353 To simplify notation, let $\cT = \pi^\infty_{\leq n}(T)$.
   358 To simplify notation, let $\cT = \pi^\infty_{\leq n}(T)$.
   354 
   359 
   355 \begin{thm} \label{thm:map-recon}
   360 \begin{thm} \label{thm:map-recon}
   356 The blob complex for $M$ with coefficients in the fundamental $A_\infty$ $n$-category for $T$ is quasi-isomorphic to singular chains on maps from $M$ to $T$.
   361 The blob complex for $M$ with coefficients in the fundamental $A_\infty$ $n$-category for $T$ 
       
   362 is quasi-isomorphic to singular chains on maps from $M$ to $T$.
   357 $$\cB^\cT(M) \simeq C_*(\Maps(M\to T)).$$
   363 $$\cB^\cT(M) \simeq C_*(\Maps(M\to T)).$$
   358 \end{thm}
   364 \end{thm}
   359 \begin{rem}
   365 \begin{rem}
   360 Lurie has shown in \cite[Theorem 3.8.6]{0911.0018} that the topological chiral homology of an $n$-manifold $M$ with coefficients in a certain $E_n$ algebra constructed from $T$ recovers  the same space of singular chains on maps from $M$ to $T$, with the additional hypothesis that $T$ is $n-1$-connected. This extra hypothesis is not surprising, in view of the idea described in Example \ref{ex:e-n-alg} that an $E_n$ algebra is roughly equivalent data to an $A_\infty$ $n$-category which is trivial at all but the topmost level. Ricardo Andrade also told us about a similar result.
   366 Lurie has shown in \cite[Theorem 3.8.6]{0911.0018} that the topological chiral homology 
       
   367 of an $n$-manifold $M$ with coefficients in a certain $E_n$ algebra constructed from $T$ recovers 
       
   368 the same space of singular chains on maps from $M$ to $T$, with the additional hypothesis that $T$ is $n-1$-connected.
       
   369 This extra hypothesis is not surprising, in view of the idea described in Example \ref{ex:e-n-alg} 
       
   370 that an $E_n$ algebra is roughly equivalent data to an $A_\infty$ $n$-category which 
       
   371 is trivial at all but the topmost level.
       
   372 Ricardo Andrade also told us about a similar result.
   361 \end{rem}
   373 \end{rem}
   362 
   374 
   363 \nn{proof is again similar to that of Theorem \ref{product_thm}.  should probably say that explicitly}
   375 \nn{proof is again similar to that of Theorem \ref{product_thm}.  should probably say that explicitly}
   364 
   376 
   365 \begin{proof}
   377 \begin{proof}