text/comm_alg.tex
changeset 342 1d76e832d32f
parent 325 0bfcb02658ce
child 400 a02a6158f3bd
child 431 2191215dae10
equal deleted inserted replaced
341:675f53735445 342:1d76e832d32f
    11 can also be thought of as an $n$-category whose $j$-morphisms are trivial for
    11 can also be thought of as an $n$-category whose $j$-morphisms are trivial for
    12 $j<n$ and whose $n$-morphisms are $C$. 
    12 $j<n$ and whose $n$-morphisms are $C$. 
    13 The goal of this \nn{subsection?} is to compute
    13 The goal of this \nn{subsection?} is to compute
    14 $\bc_*(M^n, C)$ for various commutative algebras $C$.
    14 $\bc_*(M^n, C)$ for various commutative algebras $C$.
    15 
    15 
    16 Moreover, we conjecture that the blob complex $\bc_*(M^n, $C$)$, for $C$ a commutative algebra is homotopy equivalent to the higher Hochschild complex for $M^n$ with coefficients in $C$ (see \cite{MR0339132, MR1755114, MR2383113}).  This possibility was suggested to us by Thomas Tradler.
    16 Moreover, we conjecture that the blob complex $\bc_*(M^n, $C$)$, for $C$ a commutative 
       
    17 algebra is homotopy equivalent to the higher Hochschild complex for $M^n$ with 
       
    18 coefficients in $C$ (see \cite{MR0339132, MR1755114, MR2383113}).  
       
    19 This possibility was suggested to us by Thomas Tradler.
    17 
    20 
    18 
    21 
    19 \medskip
    22 \medskip
    20 
    23 
    21 Let $k[t]$ denote the ring of polynomials in $t$ with coefficients in $k$.
    24 Let $k[t]$ denote the ring of polynomials in $t$ with coefficients in $k$.
   106 and that the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is related to the action of rotations
   109 and that the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is related to the action of rotations
   107 on $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$.
   110 on $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$.
   108 \nn{probably should put a more precise statement about cyclic homology and $S^1$ actions in the Hochschild section}
   111 \nn{probably should put a more precise statement about cyclic homology and $S^1$ actions in the Hochschild section}
   109 Let us check this directly.
   112 Let us check this directly.
   110 
   113 
   111 The algebra $k[t]$ has Koszul resolution $k[t] \tensor k[t] \xrightarrow{t\tensor 1 - 1 \tensor t} k[t] \tensor k[t]$, which has coinvariants $k[t] \xrightarrow{0} k[t]$. This is equal to its homology, so we have $HH_i(k[t]) \cong k[t]$ for $i=0,1$ and zero for $i\ge 2$.
   114 The algebra $k[t]$ has Koszul resolution 
   112 (See also  \cite[3.2.2]{MR1600246}.) This computation also tells us the $t$-gradings: $HH_0(k[t]) \iso k[t]$ is in the usual grading, and $HH_1(k[t]) \iso k[t]$ is shifted up by one.
   115 $k[t] \tensor k[t] \xrightarrow{t\tensor 1 - 1 \tensor t} k[t] \tensor k[t]$, 
       
   116 which has coinvariants $k[t] \xrightarrow{0} k[t]$. 
       
   117 This is equal to its homology, so we have $HH_i(k[t]) \cong k[t]$ for $i=0,1$ and zero for $i\ge 2$.
       
   118 (See also  \cite[3.2.2]{MR1600246}.) This computation also tells us the $t$-gradings: 
       
   119 $HH_0(k[t]) \iso k[t]$ is in the usual grading, and $HH_1(k[t]) \iso k[t]$ is shifted up by one.
   113 
   120 
   114 We can define a flow on $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ by having the points repel each other.
   121 We can define a flow on $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ by having the points repel each other.
   115 The fixed points of this flow are the equally spaced configurations.
   122 The fixed points of this flow are the equally spaced configurations.
   116 This defines a map from $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ to $S^1/j$ ($S^1$ modulo a $2\pi/j$ rotation).
   123 This defines a map from $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ to $S^1/j$ ($S^1$ modulo a $2\pi/j$ rotation).
   117 The fiber of this map is $\Delta^{j-1}$, the $(j-1)$-simplex, 
   124 The fiber of this map is $\Delta^{j-1}$, the $(j-1)$-simplex, 
   150 \[
   157 \[
   151 	HH_n(k[t_1, \ldots, t_m]) \cong \Lambda^n(k^m) \otimes k[t_1, \ldots, t_m] .
   158 	HH_n(k[t_1, \ldots, t_m]) \cong \Lambda^n(k^m) \otimes k[t_1, \ldots, t_m] .
   152 \]
   159 \]
   153 Let us check that this is also the singular homology of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$.
   160 Let us check that this is also the singular homology of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$.
   154 We will content ourselves with the case $k = \z$.
   161 We will content ourselves with the case $k = \z$.
   155 One can define a flow on $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ where points of the same color repel each other and points of different colors do not interact.
   162 One can define a flow on $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ where points of the 
       
   163 same color repel each other and points of different colors do not interact.
   156 This shows that a component $X$ of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ is homotopy equivalent
   164 This shows that a component $X$ of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ is homotopy equivalent
   157 to the torus $(S^1)^l$, where $l$ is the number of non-zero entries in the $m$-tuple
   165 to the torus $(S^1)^l$, where $l$ is the number of non-zero entries in the $m$-tuple
   158 corresponding to $X$.
   166 corresponding to $X$.
   159 The homology calculation we desire follows easily from this.
   167 The homology calculation we desire follows easily from this.
   160 
   168