blob1.tex
changeset 67 1df2e5b38eb2
parent 65 15a79fb469e1
child 69 d363611b1f59
equal deleted inserted replaced
66:58707c93f5e7 67:1df2e5b38eb2
   110 \end{itemize}
   110 \end{itemize}
   111 \item lower priority
   111 \item lower priority
   112 \begin{itemize}
   112 \begin{itemize}
   113 \item Derive Hochschild standard results from blob point of view?
   113 \item Derive Hochschild standard results from blob point of view?
   114 \item Kh
   114 \item Kh
       
   115 \item Mention somewhere \cite{MR1624157} ``Skein homology''; it's not directly related, but has similar motivations.
   115 \end{itemize}
   116 \end{itemize}
   116 \end{itemize}
   117 \end{itemize}
   117 
   118 
   118 
   119 
   119 \section{Introduction}
   120 \section{Introduction}
   291 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
   292 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
   292 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
   293 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
   293 unoriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
   294 unoriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
   294 will stick with oriented PL.)
   295 will stick with oriented PL.)
   295 
   296 
   296 Fix a top dimension $n$.
   297 Fix a top dimension $n$, and a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$ whose objects are sets. While reading the definition, you should just think about the case $\cS = \Set$ with cartesian product, until you reach the discussion of a \emph{linear system of fields} later in this section, where $\cS = \Vect$, and \S \ref{sec:homological-fields}, where $\cS = \Kom$.
   297 
   298 
   298 A {\it system of fields}
   299 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$
   299 is a collection of functors $\cC_k$, for $k \le n$, from $\cM_k$ to the
   300 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$
   300 category of sets,
       
   301 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
   301 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
   302 
   302 
   303 \nn{refer somewhere to my TQFT notes \cite{kw:tqft}, and possibly also to paper with Chris}
   303 \nn{refer somewhere to my TQFT notes \cite{kw:tqft}, and possibly also to paper with Chris}
   304 
   304 
   305 Before finishing the definition of fields, we give two motivating examples
   305 Before finishing the definition of fields, we give two motivating examples
   320 and these maps are a natural
   320 and these maps are a natural
   321 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
   321 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
   322 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
   322 For $c \in \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, we will denote by $\cC_k(X; c)$ the subset of 
   323 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
   323 $\cC(X)$ which restricts to $c$.
   324 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
   324 In this context, we will call $c$ a boundary condition.
       
   325 \item The subset $\cC_n(X;c)$ of top fields with a given boundary condition is an object in our symmetric monoidal category $\cS$. (This condition is of course trivial when $\cS = \Set$.) If the objects are sets with extra structure (e.g. $\cS = \Vect$ or $\Kom$), then this extra structure is considered part of the definition of $\cC_n$. Any maps mentioned below between top level fields must be morphisms in $\cS$.
   325 \item There are orientation reversal maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC_k(-X)$, and these maps
   326 \item There are orientation reversal maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC_k(-X)$, and these maps
   326 again comprise a natural transformation of functors.
   327 again comprise a natural transformation of functors.
   327 In addition, the orientation reversal maps are compatible with the boundary restriction maps.
   328 In addition, the orientation reversal maps are compatible with the boundary restriction maps.
   328 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
   329 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
   329 structures on $\cM_k$ and sets: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
   330 structures on $\cM_k$, $\Set$ and $\cS$: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
   330 compatibly with homeomorphisms, restriction to boundary, and orientation reversal.
   331 compatibly with homeomorphisms, restriction to boundary, and orientation reversal.
   331 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
   332 We will call the projections $\cC(X_1 \du X_2) \to \cC(X_i)$
   332 restriction maps.
   333 restriction maps.
   333 \item Gluing without corners.
   334 \item Gluing without corners.
   334 Let $\bd X = Y \du -Y \du W$, where $Y$ and $W$ are closed $k{-}1$-manifolds.
   335 Let $\bd X = Y \du -Y \du W$, where $Y$ and $W$ are closed $k{-}1$-manifolds.
   398 on $M$ generated by isotopy plus all instance of the above construction
   399 on $M$ generated by isotopy plus all instance of the above construction
   399 (for all appropriate $Y$ and $x$).
   400 (for all appropriate $Y$ and $x$).
   400 
   401 
   401 \nn{should also say something about pseudo-isotopy}
   402 \nn{should also say something about pseudo-isotopy}
   402 
   403 
   403 \bigskip
   404 %\bigskip
   404 \hrule
   405 %\hrule
   405 \bigskip
   406 %\bigskip
   406 
   407 %
   407 \input{text/fields.tex}
   408 %\input{text/fields.tex}
   408 
   409 %
   409 
   410 %
   410 \bigskip
   411 %\bigskip
   411 \hrule
   412 %\hrule
   412 \bigskip
   413 %\bigskip
   413 
   414 
   414 \nn{note: probably will suppress from notation the distinction
   415 \nn{note: probably will suppress from notation the distinction
   415 between fields and their (orientation-reversal) duals}
   416 between fields and their (orientation-reversal) duals}
   416 
   417 
   417 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   418 \nn{remark that if top dimensional fields are not already linear
   724 	\bc_k(X) \deq \bigoplus_{\overline{B}} \bigoplus_{\overline{c}}
   725 	\bc_k(X) \deq \bigoplus_{\overline{B}} \bigoplus_{\overline{c}}
   725 		\left( \otimes_j U(B_j; c_j)\right) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t) .
   726 		\left( \otimes_j U(B_j; c_j)\right) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t) .
   726 \]
   727 \]
   727 Here $\overline{B}$ runs over all configurations of blobs, satisfying the conditions above.
   728 Here $\overline{B}$ runs over all configurations of blobs, satisfying the conditions above.
   728 $\overline{c}$ runs over all boundary conditions, again as described above.
   729 $\overline{c}$ runs over all boundary conditions, again as described above.
   729 $j$ runs over all indices of twig blobs.
   730 $j$ runs over all indices of twig blobs. The final $\lf(X \setmin B^t; c^t)$ must be interpreted as fields which are cuttable along all of the blobs in $\overline{B}$.
   730 
   731 
   731 The boundary map $\bd : \bc_k(X) \to \bc_{k-1}(X)$ is defined as follows.
   732 The boundary map $\bd : \bc_k(X) \to \bc_{k-1}(X)$ is defined as follows.
   732 Let $b = (\{B_i\}, \{u_j\}, r)$ be a $k$-blob diagram.
   733 Let $b = (\{B_i\}, \{u_j\}, r)$ be a $k$-blob diagram.
   733 Let $E_j(b)$ denote the result of erasing the $j$-th blob.
   734 Let $E_j(b)$ denote the result of erasing the $j$-th blob.
   734 If $B_j$ is not a twig blob, this involves only decrementing
   735 If $B_j$ is not a twig blob, this involves only decrementing