text/appendixes/comparing_defs.tex
changeset 854 1e4bb652812d
parent 853 870d6fac5420
child 865 7abe7642265e
equal deleted inserted replaced
853:870d6fac5420 854:1e4bb652812d
   124 \label{ssec:2-cats}
   124 \label{ssec:2-cats}
   125 Let $\cC$ be a disk-like 2-category.
   125 Let $\cC$ be a disk-like 2-category.
   126 We will construct from $\cC$ a traditional pivotal 2-category.
   126 We will construct from $\cC$ a traditional pivotal 2-category.
   127 (The ``pivotal" corresponds to our assumption of strong duality for $\cC$.)
   127 (The ``pivotal" corresponds to our assumption of strong duality for $\cC$.)
   128 
   128 
   129 We will try to describe the construction in such a way the the generalization to $n>2$ is clear,
   129 We will try to describe the construction in such a way that the generalization to $n>2$ is clear,
   130 though this will make the $n=2$ case a little more complicated than necessary.
   130 though this will make the $n=2$ case a little more complicated than necessary.
   131 
   131 
   132 Before proceeding, we must decide whether the 2-morphisms of our
   132 Before proceeding, we must decide whether the 2-morphisms of our
   133 pivotal 2-category are shaped like rectangles or bigons.
   133 pivotal 2-category are shaped like rectangles or bigons.
   134 Each approach has advantages and disadvantages.
   134 Each approach has advantages and disadvantages.
   584 The objects of $A$ are $\cC(pt)$.
   584 The objects of $A$ are $\cC(pt)$.
   585 The morphisms of $A$, from $x$ to $y$, are $\cC(I; x, y)$
   585 The morphisms of $A$, from $x$ to $y$, are $\cC(I; x, y)$
   586 ($\cC$ applied to the standard interval with boundary labeled by $x$ and $y$).
   586 ($\cC$ applied to the standard interval with boundary labeled by $x$ and $y$).
   587 For simplicity we will now assume there is only one object and suppress it from the notation.
   587 For simplicity we will now assume there is only one object and suppress it from the notation.
   588 
   588 
   589 A choice of homeomorphism $I\cup I \to I$ induces a chain map $m_2: A\times A\to A$.
   589 A choice of homeomorphism $I\cup I \to I$ induces a chain map $m_2: A\otimes A\to A$.
   590 We now have two different homeomorphisms $I\cup I\cup I \to I$, but they are isotopic.
   590 We now have two different homeomorphisms $I\cup I\cup I \to I$, but they are isotopic.
   591 Choose a specific 1-parameter family of homeomorphisms connecting them; this induces
   591 Choose a specific 1-parameter family of homeomorphisms connecting them; this induces
   592 a degree 1 chain homotopy $m_3:A\ot A\ot A\to A$.
   592 a degree 1 chain homotopy $m_3:A\ot A\ot A\to A$.
   593 Proceeding in this way we define the rest of the $m_i$'s.
   593 Proceeding in this way we define the rest of the $m_i$'s.
   594 It is straightforward to verify that they satisfy the necessary identities.
   594 It is straightforward to verify that they satisfy the necessary identities.