30 \item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting? |
30 \item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting? |
31 \item[7.6] is new! (S) read |
31 \item[7.6] is new! (S) read |
32 \item[8] improve the beginning, finish proof for products, |
32 \item[8] improve the beginning, finish proof for products, |
33 check the argument about maps |
33 check the argument about maps |
34 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off |
34 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off |
35 |
|
36 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}. |
|
37 \nn{KW: Do we need to do this? We don't really classify field theories. |
|
38 I suppose our work could be interpreted as a alternative proof of cobordism hypothesis, but we |
|
39 don't emphasize that at the moment. |
|
40 On the other hand, I'm happy to do Chris a favor by citing this stuff.} |
|
41 |
35 |
42 \item Make clear exactly what counts as a ``blob diagram", and search for |
36 \item Make clear exactly what counts as a ``blob diagram", and search for |
43 ``blob diagram" |
37 ``blob diagram" |
44 |
38 |
45 \item Say something about stabilizing an $n$-category (centre), taking the top $k$ levels of a category, and the stabilization hypothesis? |
39 \item Say something about stabilizing an $n$-category (centre), taking the top $k$ levels of a category, and the stabilization hypothesis? |