equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
10 |
10 |
11 * should we require, for A-inf n-cats, that families which preserve product morphisms act trivially? as now defined, this is only true up to homotopy for the blob complex, so maybe best not to open that can of worms |
11 * should we require, for A-inf n-cats, that families which preserve product morphisms act trivially? as now defined, this is only true up to homotopy for the blob complex, so maybe best not to open that can of worms |
12 (but since the strict version of this is true for BT_*, maybe we're OK) |
12 (but since the strict version of this is true for BT_*, maybe we're OK) |
13 |
13 |
14 * figures |
14 * figures |
15 ** 13 "combining two balls" is lame |
15 (** 13 "combining two balls" is lame) (but maybe leave it as is -- KW) |
16 ** colors in pinched products --K |
|
17 ** k-marked balls are currently an ugly blue 29/30/31/32/33 --K |
|
18 ** 38/39/40, pictures for Morita equivalence are handwritten |
|
19 ** figures for email thread with Mike Schulman?? |
16 ** figures for email thread with Mike Schulman?? |
|
17 |
20 |
18 |
21 * better discussion of systems of fields from disk-like n-cats |
19 * better discussion of systems of fields from disk-like n-cats |
22 *** Is this done by now? |
20 *** Is this done by now? |
23 |
21 |
24 * make sure we are clear that boundary = germ |
22 * make sure we are clear that boundary = germ |