text/evmap.tex
changeset 523 352389c6ddcf
parent 521 4a988e00468a
child 524 edf8798ef477
equal deleted inserted replaced
522:a60c035e53bd 523:352389c6ddcf
    54 
    54 
    55 \medskip
    55 \medskip
    56 
    56 
    57 If $b$ is a blob diagram in $\bc_*(X)$, define the {\it support} of $b$, denoted
    57 If $b$ is a blob diagram in $\bc_*(X)$, define the {\it support} of $b$, denoted
    58 $\supp(b)$ or $|b|$, to be the union of the blobs of $b$.
    58 $\supp(b)$ or $|b|$, to be the union of the blobs of $b$.
    59 For a general $k-chain$ $a\in \bc_k(X)$, define the support of $a$ to be the union
    59 For a general $k$-chain $a\in \bc_k(X)$, define the support of $a$ to be the union
    60 of the supports of the blob diagrams which appear in it.
    60 of the supports of the blob diagrams which appear in it.
    61 
    61 
    62 If $f: P\times X\to X$ is a family of homeomorphisms and $Y\sub X$, we say that $f$ is 
    62 If $f: P\times X\to X$ is a family of homeomorphisms and $Y\sub X$, we say that $f$ is 
    63 {\it supported on $Y$} if $f(p, x) = f(p', x)$ for all $x\in X\setmin Y$ and all $p,p'\in P$.
    63 {\it supported on $Y$} if $f(p, x) = f(p', x)$ for all $x\in X\setmin Y$ and all $p,p'\in P$.
    64 We will sometimes abuse language and talk about ``the" support of $f$,
    64 We will sometimes abuse language and talk about ``the" support of $f$,
    73 Define the ``small blob complex" $\bc^{\cU}_*(M)$ to be the subcomplex of $\bc_*(X)$ 
    73 Define the ``small blob complex" $\bc^{\cU}_*(M)$ to be the subcomplex of $\bc_*(X)$ 
    74 of all blob diagrams in which every blob is contained in some open set of $\cU$, 
    74 of all blob diagrams in which every blob is contained in some open set of $\cU$, 
    75 and moreover each field labeling a region cut out by the blobs is splittable 
    75 and moreover each field labeling a region cut out by the blobs is splittable 
    76 into fields on smaller regions, each of which is contained in some open set of $\cU$.
    76 into fields on smaller regions, each of which is contained in some open set of $\cU$.
    77 
    77 
    78 \begin{thm}[Small blobs] \label{thm:small-blobs-xx}
    78 \begin{lemma}[Small blobs] \label{small-blobs-b}
    79 The inclusion $i: \bc^{\cU}_*(M) \into \bc_*(M)$ is a homotopy equivalence.
    79 The inclusion $i: \bc^{\cU}_*(M) \into \bc_*(M)$ is a homotopy equivalence.
    80 \end{thm}
    80 \end{lemma}
    81 
    81 
    82 \begin{proof}
    82 \begin{proof}
    83 It suffices to show that for any finitely generated pair of subcomplexes 
    83 It suffices to show that for any finitely generated pair of subcomplexes 
    84 $(C_*, D_*) \sub (\bc_*(X), \sbc_*(X))$
    84 $(C_*, D_*) \sub (\bc_*(X), \sbc_*(X))$
    85 we can find a homotopy $h:C_*\to \bc_*(X)$ such that $h(D_*) \sub \sbc_*(X)$
    85 we can find a homotopy $h:C_*\to \bc_*(X)$ such that $h(D_*) \sub \sbc_*(X)$
    86 and $x + h\bd(x) + \bd h(X) \in \sbc_*(X)_*(X)$ for all $x\in C_*$.
    86 and $x + h\bd(x) + \bd h(X) \in \sbc_*(X)$ for all $x\in C_*$.
    87 
    87 
    88 For simplicity we will assume that all fields are splittable into small pieces, so that
    88 For simplicity we will assume that all fields are splittable into small pieces, so that
    89 $\sbc_0(X) = \bc_0$.
    89 $\sbc_0(X) = \bc_0$.
    90 (This is true for all of the examples presented in this paper.)
    90 (This is true for all of the examples presented in this paper.)
    91 Accordingly, we define $h_0 = 0$.
    91 Accordingly, we define $h_0 = 0$.
   295 			&= x - r(x) + r(x) - r(x)\\
   295 			&= x - r(x) + r(x) - r(x)\\
   296 			&= x - r(x).
   296 			&= x - r(x).
   297 \end{align*}
   297 \end{align*}
   298 \end{proof}
   298 \end{proof}
   299 
   299 
       
   300 \begin{lemma}
       
   301 For manifolds $X$ and $Y$, we have $\btc_*(X\du Y) \simeq \btc_*(X)\otimes\btc_*(Y)$.
       
   302 \end{lemma}
       
   303 \begin{proof}
       
   304 This follows from the Eilenber-Zilber theorem and the fact that
       
   305 \[
       
   306 	\BD_k(X\du Y) \cong \coprod_{i+j=k} \BD_i(X)\times\BD_j(Y) .
       
   307 \]
       
   308 \end{proof}
       
   309 
       
   310 For $S\sub X$, we say that $a\in \btc_k(X)$ is {\it supported on $S$}
       
   311 if there exists $S' \subeq S$, $a'\in \btc_k(S')$
       
   312 and $r\in \btc_0(X\setmin S')$ such that $a = a'\bullet r$.
       
   313 
       
   314 \newcommand\sbtc{\btc^{\cU}}
       
   315 Let $\cU$ be an open cover of $X$.
       
   316 Let $\sbtc_*(X)\sub\btc_*(X)$ be the subcomplex generated by
       
   317 $a\in \btc_*(X)$ such that there is a decomposition $X = \cup_i D_i$
       
   318 such that each $D_i$ is a ball contained in some open set of $\cU$ and
       
   319 $a$ is splittable along this decomposition.
       
   320 In other words, $a$ can be obtained by gluing together pieces, each of which
       
   321 is small with respect to $\cU$.
       
   322 
       
   323 \begin{lemma} \label{small-top-blobs}
       
   324 For any open cover $\cU$ of $X$, the inclusion $\sbtc_*(X)\sub\btc_*(X)$
       
   325 is a homotopy equivalence.
       
   326 \end{lemma}
       
   327 \begin{proof}
       
   328 This follows from a combination of Lemma \ref{extension_lemma_c} and the techniques of
       
   329 the proof of Lemma \ref{small-blobs-b}.
       
   330 
       
   331 It suffices to show that we can deform a finite subcomplex $C_*$ of $\btc_*(X)$ into $\sbtc_*(X)$
       
   332 (relative to any designated subcomplex of $C_*$ already in $\sbtc_*(X)$).
       
   333 The first step is to replace families of general blob diagrams with families that are 
       
   334 small with respect to $\cU$.
       
   335 This is done as in the proof of Lemma \ref{small-blobs-b}; the technique of the proof works in families.
       
   336 Each such family is homotopic to a sum families which can be a ``lifted" to $\Homeo(X)$.
       
   337 That is, $f:P \to \BD_k$ has the form $f(p) = g(p)(b)$ for some $g:P\to \Homeo(X)$ and $b\in \BD_k$.
       
   338 (We are ignoring a complication related to twig blob labels, which might vary
       
   339 independently of $g$, but this complication does not affect the conclusion we draw here.)
       
   340 We now apply Lemma \ref{extension_lemma_c} to get families which are supported 
       
   341 on balls $D_i$ contained in open sets of $\cU$.
       
   342 \end{proof}
       
   343 
       
   344 
       
   345 \begin{proof}[Proof of \ref{lem:bt-btc}]
       
   346 Armed with the above lemmas, we can now proceed similarly to the proof of \ref{small-blobs-b}.
       
   347 
       
   348 It suffices to show that for any finitely generated pair of subcomplexes 
       
   349 $(C_*, D_*) \sub (\btc_*(X), \bc_*(X))$
       
   350 we can find a homotopy $h:C_*\to \btc_*(X)$ such that $h(D_*) \sub \bc_*(X)$
       
   351 and $x + h\bd(x) + \bd h(X) \in \bc_*(X)$ for all $x\in C_*$.
       
   352 
       
   353 By Lemma \ref{small-top-blobs}, we may assume that $C_* \sub \btc_*^\cU(X)$ for some
       
   354 cover $\cU$ of our choosing.
       
   355 We choose $\cU$ fine enough so that each generator of $C_*$ is supported on a disjoint union of balls.
       
   356 (This is possible since the original $C_*$ was finite and therefore had bounded dimension.)
       
   357 
       
   358 Since $\bc_0(X) = \btc_0(X)$, we can take $h_0 = 0$.
       
   359 
       
   360 
       
   361 
       
   362 
       
   363 \nn{...}
       
   364 \end{proof}
       
   365 
       
   366 
   300 
   367 
   301 
   368 
   302 
   369 
   303 
   370 
   304 
   371