text/ncat.tex
changeset 187 4067c74547bb
parent 186 748cd16881bf
child 189 a3631a999462
equal deleted inserted replaced
186:748cd16881bf 187:4067c74547bb
    16 
    16 
    17 \subsection{Definition of $n$-categories}
    17 \subsection{Definition of $n$-categories}
    18 
    18 
    19 Before proceeding, we need more appropriate definitions of $n$-categories, 
    19 Before proceeding, we need more appropriate definitions of $n$-categories, 
    20 $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, modules for these, and tensor products of these modules.
    20 $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, modules for these, and tensor products of these modules.
    21 (As is the case throughout this paper, by ``$n$-category" we mean
    21 (As is the case throughout this paper, by ``$n$-category" we implicitly intend some notion of
    22 a weak $n$-category with strong duality.)
    22 a `weak' $n$-category with `strong duality'.)
    23 
    23 
    24 The definitions presented below tie the categories more closely to the topology
    24 The definitions presented below tie the categories more closely to the topology
    25 and avoid combinatorial questions about, for example, the minimal sufficient
    25 and avoid combinatorial questions about, for example, the minimal sufficient
    26 collections of generalized associativity axioms; we prefer maximal sets of axioms to minimal sets.
    26 collections of generalized associativity axioms; we prefer maximal sets of axioms to minimal sets.
    27 For examples of topological origin, it is typically easy to show that they
    27 For examples of topological origin, it is typically easy to show that they
    44 
    44 
    45 We will allow our $k$-morphisms to have any shape, so long as it is homeomorphic to 
    45 We will allow our $k$-morphisms to have any shape, so long as it is homeomorphic to 
    46 the standard $k$-ball.
    46 the standard $k$-ball.
    47 In other words,
    47 In other words,
    48 
    48 
    49 \xxpar{Morphisms (preliminary version):}
    49 \begin{preliminary-axiom}{\ref{axiom:morphisms}}{Morphisms}
    50 {For any $k$-manifold $X$ homeomorphic 
    50 For any $k$-manifold $X$ homeomorphic 
    51 to the standard $k$-ball, we have a set of $k$-morphisms
    51 to the standard $k$-ball, we have a set of $k$-morphisms
    52 $\cC_k(X)$.}
    52 $\cC_k(X)$.
       
    53 \end{preliminary-axiom}
    53 
    54 
    54 Terminology: By ``a $k$-ball" we mean any $k$-manifold which is homeomorphic to the 
    55 Terminology: By ``a $k$-ball" we mean any $k$-manifold which is homeomorphic to the 
    55 standard $k$-ball.
    56 standard $k$-ball.
    56 We {\it do not} assume that it is equipped with a 
    57 We {\it do not} assume that it is equipped with a 
    57 preferred homeomorphism to the standard $k$-ball.
    58 preferred homeomorphism to the standard $k$-ball.
    62 the boundary), we want a corresponding
    63 the boundary), we want a corresponding
    63 bijection of sets $f:\cC(X)\to \cC(Y)$.
    64 bijection of sets $f:\cC(X)\to \cC(Y)$.
    64 (This will imply ``strong duality", among other things.)
    65 (This will imply ``strong duality", among other things.)
    65 So we replace the above with
    66 So we replace the above with
    66 
    67 
    67 \xxpar{Morphisms:}
    68 \begin{axiom}[Morphisms]
    68 %\xxpar{Axiom 1 -- Morphisms:}
    69 \label{axiom:morphisms}
    69 {For each $0 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
    70 For each $0 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
    70 the category of $k$-balls and 
    71 the category of $k$-balls and 
    71 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.}
    72 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
       
    73 \end{axiom}
       
    74 
    72 
    75 
    73 (Note: We usually omit the subscript $k$.)
    76 (Note: We usually omit the subscript $k$.)
    74 
    77 
    75 We are being deliberately vague about what flavor of manifolds we are considering.
    78 We are so far  being deliberately vague about what flavor of manifolds we are considering.
    76 They could be unoriented or oriented or Spin or $\mbox{Pin}_\pm$.
    79 They could be unoriented or oriented or Spin or $\mbox{Pin}_\pm$.
    77 They could be topological or PL or smooth.
    80 They could be topological or PL or smooth.
    78 \nn{need to check whether this makes much difference --- see pseudo-isotopy below}
    81 \nn{need to check whether this makes much difference --- see pseudo-isotopy below}
    79 (If smooth, ``homeomorphism" should be read ``diffeomorphism", and we would need
    82 (If smooth, ``homeomorphism" should be read ``diffeomorphism", and we would need
    80 to be fussier about corners.)
    83 to be fussier about corners.)
    91 \nn{maybe say more here; rotate disk, Frobenius reciprocity blah blah}
    94 \nn{maybe say more here; rotate disk, Frobenius reciprocity blah blah}
    92 We prefer to combine the domain and range into a single entity which we call the 
    95 We prefer to combine the domain and range into a single entity which we call the 
    93 boundary of a morphism.
    96 boundary of a morphism.
    94 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres:
    97 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres:
    95 
    98 
    96 \xxpar{Boundaries (domain and range), part 1:}
    99 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries (spheres)]
    97 {For each $0 \le k \le n-1$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
   100 For each $0 \le k \le n-1$, we have a functor $\cC_k$ from 
    98 the category of $k$-spheres and 
   101 the category of $k$-spheres and 
    99 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.}
   102 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
       
   103 \end{axiom}
   100 
   104 
   101 (In order to conserve symbols, we use the same symbol $\cC_k$ for both morphisms and boundaries.)
   105 (In order to conserve symbols, we use the same symbol $\cC_k$ for both morphisms and boundaries.)
   102 
   106 
   103 \xxpar{Boundaries, part 2:}
   107 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries (maps)]
   104 {For each $k$-ball $X$, we have a map of sets $\bd: \cC(X)\to \cC(\bd X)$.
   108 For each $k$-ball $X$, we have a map of sets $\bd: \cC(X)\to \cC(\bd X)$.
   105 These maps, for various $X$, comprise a natural transformation of functors.}
   109 These maps, for various $X$, comprise a natural transformation of functors.
       
   110 \end{axiom}
   106 
   111 
   107 (Note that the first ``$\bd$" above is part of the data for the category, 
   112 (Note that the first ``$\bd$" above is part of the data for the category, 
   108 while the second is the ordinary boundary of manifolds.)
   113 while the second is the ordinary boundary of manifolds.)
   109 
   114 
   110 Given $c\in\cC(\bd(X))$, let $\cC(X; c) \deq \bd^{-1}(c)$.
   115 Given $c\in\cC(\bd(X))$, let $\cC(X; c) \deq \bd^{-1}(c)$.
   139 We have just argued that the boundary of a morphism has no preferred splitting into
   144 We have just argued that the boundary of a morphism has no preferred splitting into
   140 domain and range, but the converse meets with our approval.
   145 domain and range, but the converse meets with our approval.
   141 That is, given compatible domain and range, we should be able to combine them into
   146 That is, given compatible domain and range, we should be able to combine them into
   142 the full boundary of a morphism:
   147 the full boundary of a morphism:
   143 
   148 
   144 \xxpar{Domain $+$ range $\to$ boundary:}
   149 \begin{axiom}[Boundary from domain and range]
   145 {Let $S = B_1 \cup_E B_2$, where $S$ is a $k$-sphere ($0\le k\le n-1$),
   150 Let $S = B_1 \cup_E B_2$, where $S$ is a $k$-sphere $(0\le k\le n-1)$,
   146 $B_i$ is a $k$-ball, and $E = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}1$-sphere (Figure \ref{blah3}).
   151 $B_i$ is a $k$-ball, and $E = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}1$-sphere (Figure \ref{blah3}).
   147 Let $\cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2)$ denote the fibered product of the 
   152 Let $\cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2)$ denote the fibered product of the 
   148 two maps $\bd: \cC(B_i)\to \cC(E)$.
   153 two maps $\bd: \cC(B_i)\to \cC(E)$.
   149 Then (axiom) we have an injective map
   154 Then we have an injective map
   150 \[
   155 \[
   151 	\gl_E : \cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2) \to \cC(S)
   156 	\gl_E : \cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2) \to \cC(S)
   152 \]
   157 \]
   153 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms.}
   158 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms.
       
   159 \end{axiom}
   154 
   160 
   155 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   161 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   156 $$
   162 $$
   157 \begin{tikzpicture}[every label/.style={green}]
   163 \begin{tikzpicture}[every label/.style={green}]
   158 \node[fill=black, circle, label=below:$E$](S) at (0,0) {};
   164 \node[fill=black, circle, label=below:$E$](S) at (0,0) {};
   185 $k$ different types of composition of $k$-morphisms, each associated to a different direction.
   191 $k$ different types of composition of $k$-morphisms, each associated to a different direction.
   186 (For example, vertical and horizontal composition of 2-morphisms.)
   192 (For example, vertical and horizontal composition of 2-morphisms.)
   187 In the presence of strong duality, these $k$ distinct compositions are subsumed into 
   193 In the presence of strong duality, these $k$ distinct compositions are subsumed into 
   188 one general type of composition which can be in any ``direction".
   194 one general type of composition which can be in any ``direction".
   189 
   195 
   190 \xxpar{Composition:}
   196 \begin{axiom}[Composition]
   191 {Let $B = B_1 \cup_Y B_2$, where $B$, $B_1$ and $B_2$ are $k$-balls ($0\le k\le n$)
   197 Let $B = B_1 \cup_Y B_2$, where $B$, $B_1$ and $B_2$ are $k$-balls ($0\le k\le n$)
   192 and $Y = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}1$-ball (Figure \ref{blah5}).
   198 and $Y = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}1$-ball (Figure \ref{blah5}).
   193 Let $E = \bd Y$, which is a $k{-}2$-sphere.
   199 Let $E = \bd Y$, which is a $k{-}2$-sphere.
   194 Note that each of $B$, $B_1$ and $B_2$ has its boundary split into two $k{-}1$-balls by $E$.
   200 Note that each of $B$, $B_1$ and $B_2$ has its boundary split into two $k{-}1$-balls by $E$.
   195 We have restriction (domain or range) maps $\cC(B_i)_E \to \cC(Y)$.
   201 We have restriction (domain or range) maps $\cC(B_i)_E \to \cC(Y)$.
   196 Let $\cC(B_1)_E \times_{\cC(Y)} \cC(B_2)_E$ denote the fibered product of these two maps. 
   202 Let $\cC(B_1)_E \times_{\cC(Y)} \cC(B_2)_E$ denote the fibered product of these two maps. 
   199 	\gl_Y : \cC(B_1)_E \times_{\cC(Y)} \cC(B_2)_E \to \cC(B)_E
   205 	\gl_Y : \cC(B_1)_E \times_{\cC(Y)} \cC(B_2)_E \to \cC(B)_E
   200 \]
   206 \]
   201 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms, and also compatible with restrictions
   207 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms, and also compatible with restrictions
   202 to the intersection of the boundaries of $B$ and $B_i$.
   208 to the intersection of the boundaries of $B$ and $B_i$.
   203 If $k < n$ we require that $\gl_Y$ is injective.
   209 If $k < n$ we require that $\gl_Y$ is injective.
   204 (For $k=n$, see below.)}
   210 (For $k=n$, see below.)
       
   211 \end{axiom}
   205 
   212 
   206 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   213 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   207 $$\mathfig{.4}{tempkw/blah5}$$
   214 $$\mathfig{.4}{tempkw/blah5}$$
   208 \caption{From two balls to one ball}\label{blah5}\end{figure}
   215 \caption{From two balls to one ball}\label{blah5}\end{figure}
   209 
   216 
   210 \xxpar{Strict associativity:}
   217 \begin{axiom}[Strict associativity]
   211 {The composition (gluing) maps above are strictly associative.}
   218 The composition (gluing) maps above are strictly associative.
       
   219 \end{axiom}
   212 
   220 
   213 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   221 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   214 $$\mathfig{.65}{tempkw/blah6}$$
   222 $$\mathfig{.65}{tempkw/blah6}$$
   215 \caption{An example of strict associativity}\label{blah6}\end{figure}
   223 \caption{An example of strict associativity}\label{blah6}\end{figure}
   216 
   224 
   240 $$\mathfig{.8}{tempkw/blah7}$$
   248 $$\mathfig{.8}{tempkw/blah7}$$
   241 \caption{Operadish composition and associativity}\label{blah7}\end{figure}
   249 \caption{Operadish composition and associativity}\label{blah7}\end{figure}
   242 
   250 
   243 The next axiom is related to identity morphisms, though that might not be immediately obvious.
   251 The next axiom is related to identity morphisms, though that might not be immediately obvious.
   244 
   252 
   245 \xxpar{Product (identity) morphisms:}
   253 \begin{axiom}[Product (identity) morphisms]
   246 {Let $X$ be a $k$-ball and $D$ be an $m$-ball, with $k+m \le n$.
   254 Let $X$ be a $k$-ball and $D$ be an $m$-ball, with $k+m \le n$.
   247 Then we have a map $\cC(X)\to \cC(X\times D)$, usually denoted $a\mapsto a\times D$ for $a\in \cC(X)$.
   255 Then we have a map $\cC(X)\to \cC(X\times D)$, usually denoted $a\mapsto a\times D$ for $a\in \cC(X)$.
   248 If $f:X\to X'$ and $\tilde{f}:X\times D \to X'\times D'$ are maps such that the diagram
   256 If $f:X\to X'$ and $\tilde{f}:X\times D \to X'\times D'$ are maps such that the diagram
   249 \[ \xymatrix{
   257 \[ \xymatrix{
   250 	X\times D \ar[r]^{\tilde{f}} \ar[d]_{\pi} & X'\times D' \ar[d]^{\pi} \\
   258 	X\times D \ar[r]^{\tilde{f}} \ar[d]_{\pi} & X'\times D' \ar[d]^{\pi} \\
   251 	X \ar[r]^{f} & X'
   259 	X \ar[r]^{f} & X'
   272 Product morphisms are compatible with restriction:
   280 Product morphisms are compatible with restriction:
   273 \[
   281 \[
   274 	\res_{X\times E}(a\times D) = a\times E
   282 	\res_{X\times E}(a\times D) = a\times E
   275 \]
   283 \]
   276 for $E\sub \bd D$ and $a\in \cC(X)$.
   284 for $E\sub \bd D$ and $a\in \cC(X)$.
   277 }
   285 \end{axiom}
   278 
   286 
   279 \nn{need even more subaxioms for product morphisms?}
   287 \nn{need even more subaxioms for product morphisms?}
   280 
   288 
   281 \nn{Almost certainly we need a little more than the above axiom.
   289 \nn{Almost certainly we need a little more than the above axiom.
   282 More specifically, in order to bootstrap our way from the top dimension
   290 More specifically, in order to bootstrap our way from the top dimension
   299 The last axiom (below), concerning actions of 
   307 The last axiom (below), concerning actions of 
   300 homeomorphisms in the top dimension $n$, distinguishes the two cases.
   308 homeomorphisms in the top dimension $n$, distinguishes the two cases.
   301 
   309 
   302 We start with the plain $n$-category case.
   310 We start with the plain $n$-category case.
   303 
   311 
   304 \xxpar{Isotopy invariance in dimension $n$ (preliminary version):}
   312 \begin{preliminary-axiom}{\ref{axiom:extended-isotopies}}{Isotopy invariance in dimension $n$}
   305 {Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $f: X\to X$ be a homeomorphism which restricts
   313 Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $f: X\to X$ be a homeomorphism which restricts
   306 to the identity on $\bd X$ and is isotopic (rel boundary) to the identity.
   314 to the identity on $\bd X$ and is isotopic (rel boundary) to the identity.
   307 Then $f$ acts trivially on $\cC(X)$; $f(a) = a$ for all $a\in \cC(X)$.}
   315 Then $f$ acts trivially on $\cC(X)$; $f(a) = a$ for all $a\in \cC(X)$.
       
   316 \end{preliminary-axiom}
   308 
   317 
   309 This axiom needs to be strengthened to force product morphisms to act as the identity.
   318 This axiom needs to be strengthened to force product morphisms to act as the identity.
   310 Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $Y\sub\bd X$ be an $n{-}1$-ball.
   319 Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $Y\sub\bd X$ be an $n{-}1$-ball.
   311 Let $J$ be a 1-ball (interval).
   320 Let $J$ be a 1-ball (interval).
   312 We have a collaring homeomorphism $s_{Y,J}: X\cup_Y (Y\times J) \to X$.
   321 We have a collaring homeomorphism $s_{Y,J}: X\cup_Y (Y\times J) \to X$.
   331 It can be thought of as the action of the inverse of
   340 It can be thought of as the action of the inverse of
   332 a map which projects a collar neighborhood of $Y$ onto $Y$.
   341 a map which projects a collar neighborhood of $Y$ onto $Y$.
   333 
   342 
   334 The revised axiom is
   343 The revised axiom is
   335 
   344 
   336 \xxpar{Extended isotopy invariance in dimension $n$:}
   345 \begin{axiom}[Extended isotopy invariance in dimension $n$]
   337 {Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $f: X\to X$ be a homeomorphism which restricts
   346 \label{axiom:extended-isotopies}
       
   347 Let $X$ be an $n$-ball and $f: X\to X$ be a homeomorphism which restricts
   338 to the identity on $\bd X$ and is extended isotopic (rel boundary) to the identity.
   348 to the identity on $\bd X$ and is extended isotopic (rel boundary) to the identity.
   339 Then $f$ acts trivially on $\cC(X)$.}
   349 Then $f$ acts trivially on $\cC(X)$.
       
   350 \end{axiom}
   340 
   351 
   341 \nn{need to rephrase this, since extended isotopies don't correspond to homeomorphisms.}
   352 \nn{need to rephrase this, since extended isotopies don't correspond to homeomorphisms.}
   342 
   353 
   343 \smallskip
   354 \smallskip
   344 
   355 
   345 For $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, we replace
   356 For $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, we replace
   346 isotopy invariance with the requirement that families of homeomorphisms act.
   357 isotopy invariance with the requirement that families of homeomorphisms act.
   347 For the moment, assume that our $n$-morphisms are enriched over chain complexes.
   358 For the moment, assume that our $n$-morphisms are enriched over chain complexes.
   348 
   359 
   349 \xxpar{Families of homeomorphisms act in dimension $n$.}
   360 \begin{axiom}[Families of homeomorphisms act in dimension $n$]
   350 {For each $n$-ball $X$ and each $c\in \cC(\bd X)$ we have a map of chain complexes
   361 For each $n$-ball $X$ and each $c\in \cC(\bd X)$ we have a map of chain complexes
   351 \[
   362 \[
   352 	C_*(\Homeo_\bd(X))\ot \cC(X; c) \to \cC(X; c) .
   363 	C_*(\Homeo_\bd(X))\ot \cC(X; c) \to \cC(X; c) .
   353 \]
   364 \]
   354 Here $C_*$ means singular chains and $\Homeo_\bd(X)$ is the space of homeomorphisms of $X$
   365 Here $C_*$ means singular chains and $\Homeo_\bd(X)$ is the space of homeomorphisms of $X$
   355 which fix $\bd X$.
   366 which fix $\bd X$.
   356 These action maps are required to be associative up to homotopy
   367 These action maps are required to be associative up to homotopy
   357 \nn{iterated homotopy?}, and also compatible with composition (gluing) in the sense that
   368 \nn{iterated homotopy?}, and also compatible with composition (gluing) in the sense that
   358 a diagram like the one in Proposition \ref{CDprop} commutes.
   369 a diagram like the one in Proposition \ref{CDprop} commutes.
   359 \nn{repeat diagram here?}
   370 \nn{repeat diagram here?}
   360 \nn{restate this with $\Homeo(X\to X')$?  what about boundary fixing property?}}
   371 \nn{restate this with $\Homeo(X\to X')$?  what about boundary fixing property?}
       
   372 \end{axiom}
   361 
   373 
   362 We should strengthen the above axiom to apply to families of extended homeomorphisms.
   374 We should strengthen the above axiom to apply to families of extended homeomorphisms.
   363 To do this we need to explain how extended homeomorphisms form a topological space.
   375 To do this we need to explain how extended homeomorphisms form a topological space.
   364 Roughly, the set of $n{-}1$-balls in the boundary of an $n$-ball has a natural topology,
   376 Roughly, the set of $n{-}1$-balls in the boundary of an $n$-ball has a natural topology,
   365 and we can replace the class of all intervals $J$ with intervals contained in $\r$.
   377 and we can replace the class of all intervals $J$ with intervals contained in $\r$.