text/a_inf_blob.tex
changeset 525 4e4b6505d9ef
parent 524 edf8798ef477
child 526 803cc581fd42
equal deleted inserted replaced
524:edf8798ef477 525:4e4b6505d9ef
   225 
   225 
   226 \medskip
   226 \medskip
   227 
   227 
   228 Theorem \ref{thm:product} extends to the case of general fiber bundles
   228 Theorem \ref{thm:product} extends to the case of general fiber bundles
   229 \[
   229 \[
   230 	F \to E \to Y .
   230 	F \to E \to Y ,
   231 \]
   231 \]
   232 We outline one approach here and a second in \S \ref{xyxyx}.
   232 an indeed even to the case of general maps
       
   233 \[
       
   234 	M\to Y .
       
   235 \]
       
   236 We outline two approaches to these generalizations.
       
   237 The first is somewhat tautological, while the second is more amenable to
       
   238 calculation.
   233 
   239 
   234 We can generalize the definition of a $k$-category by replacing the categories
   240 We can generalize the definition of a $k$-category by replacing the categories
   235 of $j$-balls ($j\le k$) with categories of $j$-balls $D$ equipped with a map $p:D\to Y$
   241 of $j$-balls ($j\le k$) with categories of $j$-balls $D$ equipped with a map $p:D\to Y$
   236 (c.f. \cite{MR2079378}).
   242 (c.f. \cite{MR2079378}).
   237 Call this a $k$-category over $Y$.
   243 Call this a $k$-category over $Y$.
   238 A fiber bundle $F\to E\to Y$ gives an example of a $k$-category over $Y$:
   244 A fiber bundle $F\to E\to Y$ gives an example of a $k$-category over $Y$:
   239 assign to $p:D\to Y$ the blob complex $\bc_*(p^*(E))$.
   245 assign to $p:D\to Y$ the blob complex $\bc_*(p^*(E))$, if $\dim(D) = k$,
       
   246 or the fields $\cE(p^*(E))$, if $\dim(D) < k$.
       
   247 ($p^*(E)$ denotes the pull-back bundle over $D$.)
   240 Let $\cF_E$ denote this $k$-category over $Y$.
   248 Let $\cF_E$ denote this $k$-category over $Y$.
   241 We can adapt the homotopy colimit construction (based decompositions of $Y$ into balls) to
   249 We can adapt the homotopy colimit construction (based decompositions of $Y$ into balls) to
   242 get a chain complex $\cl{\cF_E}(Y)$.
   250 get a chain complex $\cl{\cF_E}(Y)$.
   243 The proof of Theorem \ref{thm:product} goes through essentially unchanged 
   251 The proof of Theorem \ref{thm:product} goes through essentially unchanged 
   244 to show that
   252 to show that
       
   253 \begin{thm}
       
   254 Let $F \to E \to Y$ be a fiber bundle and let $\cF_E$ be the $k$-category over $Y$ defined above.
       
   255 Then
   245 \[
   256 \[
   246 	\bc_*(E) \simeq \cl{\cF_E}(Y) .
   257 	\bc_*(E) \simeq \cl{\cF_E}(Y) .
   247 \]
   258 \]
   248 
   259 \qed
   249 \nn{remark further that this still works when the map is not even a fibration?}
   260 \end{thm}
   250 
   261 
   251 \nn{put this later}
   262 We can generalize this result still further by noting that it is not really necessary
   252 
   263 for the definition of $\cF_E$ that $E\to Y$ be a fiber bundle.
   253 \nn{The second approach: Choose a decomposition $Y = \cup X_i$
   264 Let $M\to Y$ be a map, with $\dim(M) = n$ and $\dim(Y) = k$.
       
   265 Call a map $D^j\to Y$ ``good" with respect to $M$ if the fibered product
       
   266 $D\widetilde{\times} M$ is a manifold of dimension $n-k+j$ with a collar structure along the boundary of $D$.
       
   267 (If $D\to Y$ is an embedding then $D\widetilde{\times} M$ is just the part of $M$
       
   268 lying above $D$.)
       
   269 We can define a $k$-category $\cF_M$ based on maps of balls into $Y$ which a re good with respect to $M$.
       
   270 We can again adapt the homotopy colimit construction to
       
   271 get a chain complex $\cl{\cF_M}(Y)$.
       
   272 The proof of Theorem \ref{thm:product} again goes through essentially unchanged 
       
   273 to show that
       
   274 \begin{thm}
       
   275 Let $M \to Y$ be a map of manifolds and let $\cF_M$ be the $k$-category over $Y$ defined above.
       
   276 Then
       
   277 \[
       
   278 	\bc_*(M) \simeq \cl{\cF_M}(Y) .
       
   279 \]
       
   280 \qed
       
   281 \end{thm}
       
   282 
       
   283 
       
   284 \medskip
       
   285 
       
   286 In the second approach we use a decorated colimit (as in \S \ref{ssec:spherecat}) 
       
   287 and various sphere modules based on $F \to E \to Y$
       
   288 or $M\to Y$, instead of an undecorated colimit with fancier $k$-categories over $Y$.
       
   289 Information about the specific map to $Y$ has been taken out of the categories
       
   290 and put into sphere modules and decorations.
       
   291 
       
   292 Let $F \to E \to Y$ be a fiber bundle as above.
       
   293 Choose a decomposition $Y = \cup X_i$
   254 such that the restriction of $E$ to $X_i$ is a product $F\times X_i$.
   294 such that the restriction of $E$ to $X_i$ is a product $F\times X_i$.
   255 Choose the product structure as well.
   295 \nn{resume revising here}
   256 To each codim-1 face $D_i\cap D_j$ we have a bimodule ($S^0$-module).
   296 Choose the product structure (trivialization of the bundle restricted to $X_i$) as well.
       
   297 To each codim-1 face $X_i\cap X_j$ we have a bimodule ($S^0$-module).
   257 And more generally to each codim-$j$ face we have an $S^{j-1}$-module.
   298 And more generally to each codim-$j$ face we have an $S^{j-1}$-module.
   258 Decorate the decomposition with these modules and do the colimit.
   299 Decorate the decomposition with these modules and do the colimit.
   259 }
   300 
   260 
   301 
   261 \nn{There is a version of this last construction for arbitrary maps $E \to Y$
   302 \nn{There is a version of this last construction for arbitrary maps $E \to Y$
   262 (not necessarily a fibration).
   303 (not necessarily a fibration).
   263 In fact, there is also a version of the first construction for non-fibrations.}
   304 In fact, there is also a version of the first construction for non-fibrations.}
       
   305 
       
   306 
       
   307 
       
   308 Note that Theorem \ref{thm:gluing} can be viewed as a special case of this one.
       
   309 Let $X_1$ and $X_2$ be $n$-manifolds
   264 
   310 
   265 
   311 
   266 
   312 
   267 \subsection{A gluing theorem}
   313 \subsection{A gluing theorem}
   268 \label{sec:gluing}
   314 \label{sec:gluing}
   404 \end{proof}
   450 \end{proof}
   405 
   451 
   406 \nn{maybe should also mention version where we enrich over
   452 \nn{maybe should also mention version where we enrich over
   407 spaces rather than chain complexes;}
   453 spaces rather than chain complexes;}
   408 
   454 
   409 \medskip
   455 
   410 \hrule
       
   411 \medskip
       
   412 
       
   413 \nn{to be continued...}
       
   414 \medskip
       
   415 \nn{still to do: general maps}
       
   416 
       
   417