text/appendixes/comparing_defs.tex
changeset 201 5acfd26510c1
parent 194 8d3f0bc6a76e
child 204 470fe2c71305
equal deleted inserted replaced
200:8f884d8c8d49 201:5acfd26510c1
    16 Let the objects of $c(\cX)$ be $c(\cX)^0 = \cX(B^0)$ and the morphisms of $c(\cX)$ be $c(\cX)^1 = \cX(B^1)$. The boundary and restriction maps of $\cX$ give domain and range maps from $c(\cX)^1$ to $c(\cX)^0$.
    16 Let the objects of $c(\cX)$ be $c(\cX)^0 = \cX(B^0)$ and the morphisms of $c(\cX)$ be $c(\cX)^1 = \cX(B^1)$. The boundary and restriction maps of $\cX$ give domain and range maps from $c(\cX)^1$ to $c(\cX)^0$.
    17 
    17 
    18 Choose a homeomorphism $B^1\cup_{pt}B^1 \to B^1$.
    18 Choose a homeomorphism $B^1\cup_{pt}B^1 \to B^1$.
    19 Define composition in $c(\cX)$ to be the induced map $c(\cX)^1\times c(\cX)^1 \to c(\cX)^1$ (defined only when range and domain agree).
    19 Define composition in $c(\cX)$ to be the induced map $c(\cX)^1\times c(\cX)^1 \to c(\cX)^1$ (defined only when range and domain agree).
    20 By isotopy invariance in $\cX$, any other choice of homeomorphism gives the same composition rule.
    20 By isotopy invariance in $\cX$, any other choice of homeomorphism gives the same composition rule.
    21 Also by isotopy invariance, composition is associative on the nose.
    21 Also by isotopy invariance, composition is strictly associative.
    22 
    22 
    23 Given $a\in c(\cX)^0$, define $\id_a \deq a\times B^1$.
    23 Given $a\in c(\cX)^0$, define $\id_a \deq a\times B^1$.
    24 By extended isotopy invariance in $\cX$, this has the expected properties of an identity morphism.
    24 By extended isotopy invariance in $\cX$, this has the expected properties of an identity morphism.
    25 
    25 
    26 
    26 
   124 vertical composition.
   124 vertical composition.
   125 
   125 
   126 Given $x\in C^0$, define $\id_x = x\times B^1 \in C^1$.
   126 Given $x\in C^0$, define $\id_x = x\times B^1 \in C^1$.
   127 We will show that this 1-morphism is a weak identity.
   127 We will show that this 1-morphism is a weak identity.
   128 This would be easier if our 2-morphisms were shaped like rectangles rather than bigons.
   128 This would be easier if our 2-morphisms were shaped like rectangles rather than bigons.
   129 Define let $a: y\to x$ be a 1-morphism.
   129 Let $a: y\to x$ be a 1-morphism.
   130 Define maps $a \to a\bullet \id_x$ and $a\bullet \id_x \to a$
   130 Define maps $a \to a\bullet \id_x$ and $a\bullet \id_x \to a$
   131 as shown in Figure \ref{fzo2}.
   131 as shown in Figure \ref{fzo2}.
   132 \begin{figure}[t]
   132 \begin{figure}[t]
   133 \begin{equation*}
   133 \begin{equation*}
   134 \mathfig{.73}{tempkw/zo2}
   134 \mathfig{.73}{tempkw/zo2}
   135 \end{equation*}
   135 \end{equation*}
   136 \caption{blah blah}
   136 \caption{blah blah}
   137 \label{fzo2}
   137 \label{fzo2}
   138 \end{figure}
   138 \end{figure}
   139 In that figure, the red cross-hatched areas are the product of $x$ and a smaller bigon,
   139 In that figure, the red cross-hatched areas are the product of $x$ and a smaller bigon,
   140 while the remained is a half-pinched version of $a\times I$.
   140 while the remainder is a half-pinched version of $a\times I$.
   141 \nn{the red region is unnecessary; remove it?  or does it help?
   141 \nn{the red region is unnecessary; remove it?  or does it help?
   142 (because it's what you get if you bigonify the natural rectangular picture)}
   142 (because it's what you get if you bigonify the natural rectangular picture)}
   143 We must show that the two compositions of these two maps give the identity 2-morphisms
   143 We must show that the two compositions of these two maps give the identity 2-morphisms
   144 on $a$ and $a\bullet \id_x$, as defined above.
   144 on $a$ and $a\bullet \id_x$, as defined above.
   145 Figure \ref{fzo3} shows one case.
   145 Figure \ref{fzo3} shows one case.