text/evmap.tex
changeset 83 62cd552bf8c9
parent 73 4888269574d9
child 84 c3aace2330ac
equal deleted inserted replaced
82:e9fac1a6954b 83:62cd552bf8c9
   126 where $r(b_W)$ denotes the obvious action of diffeomorphisms on blob diagrams (in
   126 where $r(b_W)$ denotes the obvious action of diffeomorphisms on blob diagrams (in
   127 this case a 0-blob diagram).
   127 this case a 0-blob diagram).
   128 Since $V'$ is a disjoint union of balls, $\bc_*(V')$ is acyclic in degrees $>0$ 
   128 Since $V'$ is a disjoint union of balls, $\bc_*(V')$ is acyclic in degrees $>0$ 
   129 (by \ref{disjunion} and \ref{bcontract}).
   129 (by \ref{disjunion} and \ref{bcontract}).
   130 Assuming inductively that we have already defined $e_{VV'}(\bd(q\otimes b_V))$,
   130 Assuming inductively that we have already defined $e_{VV'}(\bd(q\otimes b_V))$,
   131 there is, up to homotopy, a unique choice for $e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V)$
   131 there is, up to (iterated) homotopy, a unique choice for $e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V)$
   132 such that 
   132 such that 
   133 \[
   133 \[
   134 	\bd(e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V)) = e_{VV'}(\bd(q\otimes b_V)) .
   134 	\bd(e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V)) = e_{VV'}(\bd(q\otimes b_V)) .
   135 \]
   135 \]
   136 
   136 
   137 Thus the conditions of the proposition determine (up to homotopy) the evaluation
   137 Thus the conditions of the proposition determine (up to homotopy) the evaluation
   138 map for generators $p\otimes b$ such that $\supp(p) \cup \supp(b)$ is contained in a disjoint
   138 map for generators $p\otimes b$ such that $\supp(p) \cup \supp(b)$ is contained in a disjoint
   139 union of balls.
   139 union of balls.
   140 On the other hand, Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} allows us to homotope 
   140 On the other hand, Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} allows us to homotope 
   141 \nn{is this commonly used as a verb?} arbitrary generators to sums of generators with this property.
   141 \nn{is this commonly used as a verb?} arbitrary generators to sums of generators with this property.
   142 \nn{should give a name to this property}
   142 \nn{should give a name to this property; also forward reference}
   143 This (roughly) establishes the uniqueness part of the proposition.
   143 This (roughly) establishes the uniqueness part of the proposition.
   144 To show existence, we must show that the various choices involved in constructing
   144 To show existence, we must show that the various choices involved in constructing
   145 evaluation maps in this way affect the final answer only by a homotopy.
   145 evaluation maps in this way affect the final answer only by a homotopy.
   146 
   146 
   147 \nn{now for a more detailed outline of the proof...}
   147 \nn{maybe put a little more into the outline before diving into the details.}
   148 
   148 
       
   149 \nn{Note: At the moment this section is very inconsistent with respect to PL versus smooth,
       
   150 homeomorphism versus diffeomorphism, etc.
       
   151 We expect that everything is true in the PL category, but at the moment our proof
       
   152 avails itself to smooth techniques.
       
   153 Furthermore, it traditional in the literature to speak of $C_*(\Diff(X))$
       
   154 rather than $C_*(\Homeo(X))$.}
       
   155 
       
   156 \medskip
       
   157 
       
   158 Now for the details.
       
   159 
       
   160 Notation: Let $|b| = \supp(b)$, $|p| = \supp(p)$.
       
   161 
       
   162 Choose a metric on $X$.
       
   163 Choose a monotone decreasing sequence of positive real numbers $\ep_i$ converging to zero
       
   164 (e.g.\ $\ep_i = 2^{-i}$).
       
   165 Choose another sequence of positive real numbers $\delta_i$ such that $\delta_i/\ep_i$
       
   166 converges monotonically to zero (e.g.\ $\delta_i = \ep_i^2$).
       
   167 Given a generator $p\otimes b$ of $CD_*(X)\otimes \bc_*(X)$ and non-negative integers $i$ and $k$
       
   168 define
       
   169 \[
       
   170 	N_{i,k}(p\ot b) \deq \Nbd_{k\ep_i}(|b|) \cup \Nbd_{k\delta_i}(|p|).
       
   171 \]
       
   172 In other words, we use the metric to choose nested neighborhoods of $|b|\cup |p|$ (parameterized
       
   173 by $k$), with $\ep_i$ controlling the size of the buffer around $|b|$ and $\delta_i$ controlling
       
   174 the size of the buffer around $|p|$.
       
   175 
       
   176 Next we define subcomplexes $G_*^{i,m} \sub CD_*(X)\otimes \bc_*(X)$.
       
   177 Let $p\ot b$ be a generator of $CD_*(X)\otimes \bc_*(X)$ and let $k = \deg(p\ot b)
       
   178 = \deg(p) + \deg(b)$.
       
   179 $p\ot b$ is (by definition) in $G_*^{i,m}$ if either (a) $\deg(p) = 0$ or (b)
       
   180 there exist codimension-zero submanifolds $V_1,\ldots,V_m \sub X$ such that each $V_j$
       
   181 is homeomorphic to a disjoint union of balls and
       
   182 \[
       
   183 	N_{i,k}(p\ot b) \subeq V_1 \subeq N_{i,k+1}(p\ot b)
       
   184 			\subeq V_2 \subeq \cdots \subeq V_m \subeq N_{i,k+m}(p\ot b) .
       
   185 \]
       
   186 Further, we require (inductively) that $\bd(p\ot b) \in G_*^{i,m}$.
       
   187 We also require that $b$ is splitable (transverse) along the boundary of each $V_l$.
       
   188 
       
   189 Note that $G_*^{i,m+1} \subeq G_*^{i,m}$.
       
   190 
       
   191 As sketched above and explained in detail below, 
       
   192 $G_*^{i,m}$ is a subcomplex where it is easy to define
       
   193 the evaluation map.
       
   194 The parameter $m$ controls the number of iterated homotopies we are able to construct.
       
   195 The larger $i$ is (i.e.\ the smaller $\ep_i$ is), the better $G_*^{i,m}$ approximates all of
       
   196 $CD_*(X)\ot \bc_*(X)$.
       
   197 
       
   198 Next we define a chain map (dependent on some choices) $e: G_*^{i,m} \to \bc_*(X)$.
       
   199 Let $p\ot b \in G_*^{i,m}$.
       
   200 If $\deg(p) = 0$, define
       
   201 \[
       
   202 	e(p\ot b) = p(b) ,
       
   203 \]
       
   204 where $p(b)$ denotes the obvious action of the diffeomorphism(s) $p$ on the blob diagram $b$.
       
   205 For general $p\ot b$ ($\deg(p) \ge 1$) assume inductively that we have already defined
       
   206 $e(p'\ot b')$ when $\deg(p') + \deg(b') < k = \deg(p) + \deg(b)$.
       
   207 Choose $V_1$ as above so that 
       
   208 \[
       
   209 	N_{i,k}(p\ot b) \subeq V_1 \subeq N_{i,k+1}(p\ot b) .
       
   210 \]
       
   211 Let $\bd(p\ot b) = \sum_j p_j\ot b_j$, and let $V_1^j$ be the choice of neighborhood
       
   212 of $|p_j|\cup |b_j|$ made at the preceding stage of the induction.
       
   213 For all $j$, 
       
   214 \[
       
   215 	V_1^j \subeq N_{i,(k-1)+1}(p_j\ot b_j) \subeq N_{i,k}(p\ot b) \subeq V_1 .
       
   216 \]
       
   217 (The second inclusion uses the facts that $|p_j| \subeq |p|$ and $|b_j| \subeq |b|$.)
       
   218 We therefore have splittings
       
   219 \[
       
   220 	p = p'\bullet p'' , \;\; b = b'\bullet b'' , \;\; e(\bd(p\ot b)) = f'\bullet f'' ,
       
   221 \]
       
   222 where $p' \in CD_*(V_1)$, $p'' \in CD_*(X\setmin V_1)$, 
       
   223 $b' \in \bc_*(V_1)$, $b'' \in \bc_*(X\setmin V_1)$, 
       
   224 $e' \in \bc_*(p(V_1))$, and $e'' \in \bc_*(p(X\setmin V_1))$.
       
   225 (Note that since the family of diffeomorphisms $p$ is constant (independent of parameters)
       
   226 near $\bd V_1)$, the expressions $p(V_1) \sub X$ and $p(X\setmin V_1) \sub X$ are
       
   227 unambiguous.)
       
   228 We also have that $\deg(b'') = 0 = \deg(p'')$.
       
   229 Choose $x' \in \bc_*(p(V_1))$ such that $\bd x' = f'$.
       
   230 This is possible by \nn{...}.
       
   231 Finally, define
       
   232 \[
       
   233 	e(p\ot b) \deq x' \bullet p''(b'') .
       
   234 \]
   149 
   235 
   150 
   236 
   151 \medskip
   237 \medskip
   152 
   238 
   153 \nn{to be continued....}
   239 \nn{to be continued....}