text/ncat.tex
changeset 108 631a082cd21b
parent 107 60bb1039be50
child 109 65b291b5e8c8
equal deleted inserted replaced
107:60bb1039be50 108:631a082cd21b
     5 \section{$n$-categories (maybe)}
     5 \section{$n$-categories (maybe)}
     6 \label{sec:ncats}
     6 \label{sec:ncats}
     7 
     7 
     8 \nn{experimental section.  maybe this should be rolled into other sections.
     8 \nn{experimental section.  maybe this should be rolled into other sections.
     9 maybe it should be split off into a separate paper.}
     9 maybe it should be split off into a separate paper.}
       
    10 
       
    11 \subsection{Definition of $n$-categories}
    10 
    12 
    11 Before proceeding, we need more appropriate definitions of $n$-categories, 
    13 Before proceeding, we need more appropriate definitions of $n$-categories, 
    12 $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, modules for these, and tensor products of these modules.
    14 $A_\infty$ $n$-categories, modules for these, and tensor products of these modules.
    13 (As is the case throughout this paper, by ``$n$-category" we mean
    15 (As is the case throughout this paper, by ``$n$-category" we mean
    14 a weak $n$-category with strong duality.)
    16 a weak $n$-category with strong duality.)
    22 and so on.
    24 and so on.
    23 (This allows for strict associativity.)
    25 (This allows for strict associativity.)
    24 Still other definitions \nn{need refs for all these; maybe the Leinster book}
    26 Still other definitions \nn{need refs for all these; maybe the Leinster book}
    25 model the $k$-morphisms on more complicated combinatorial polyhedra.
    27 model the $k$-morphisms on more complicated combinatorial polyhedra.
    26 
    28 
    27 We will allow our $k$-morphisms to have any shape, so long as it is homeomorphic to a $k$-ball.
    29 We will allow our $k$-morphisms to have any shape, so long as it is homeomorphic to 
       
    30 the standard $k$-ball.
    28 In other words,
    31 In other words,
    29 
    32 
    30 \xxpar{Morphisms (preliminary version):}
    33 \xxpar{Morphisms (preliminary version):}
    31 {For any $k$-manifold $X$ homeomorphic 
    34 {For any $k$-manifold $X$ homeomorphic 
    32 to the standard $k$-ball, we have a set of $k$-morphisms
    35 to the standard $k$-ball, we have a set of $k$-morphisms
   349 define $\cC(X; c) = \bc^C_*(X\times F; c)$, where $X$ is an $n$-ball
   352 define $\cC(X; c) = \bc^C_*(X\times F; c)$, where $X$ is an $n$-ball
   350 and $\bc^C_*$ denotes the blob complex based on $C$.
   353 and $\bc^C_*$ denotes the blob complex based on $C$.
   351 
   354 
   352 \end{itemize}
   355 \end{itemize}
   353 
   356 
   354 \medskip
   357 
       
   358 
       
   359 
       
   360 
       
   361 
       
   362 \subsection{From $n$-categories to systems of fields}
       
   363 
       
   364 We can extend the functors $\cC$ above from $k$-balls to arbitrary $k$-manifolds as follows.
       
   365 
       
   366 Let $W$ be a $k$-manifold, $1\le k \le n$.
       
   367 We will define a set $\cC(W)$.
       
   368 (If $k = n$ and our $k$-categories are enriched, then
       
   369 $\cC(W)$ will have additional structure; see below.)
       
   370 $\cC(W)$ will be the colimit of a functor defined on a category $\cJ(W)$,
       
   371 which we define next.
       
   372 
       
   373 Define a permissible decomposition of $W$ to be a decomposition
       
   374 \[
       
   375 	W = \bigcup_a X_a ,
       
   376 \]
       
   377 where each $X_a$ is a $k$-ball.
       
   378 Given permissible decompositions $x$ and $y$, we say that $x$ is a refinement
       
   379 of $y$, or write $x \le y$, if each ball of $y$ is a union of balls of $x$.
       
   380 This defines a partial ordering $\cJ(W)$, which we will think of as a category.
       
   381 (The objects of $\cJ(W)$ are permissible decompositions of $W$, and there is a unique
       
   382 morphism from $x$ to $y$ if and only if $x$ is a refinement of $y$.)
       
   383 \nn{need figures}
       
   384 
       
   385 $\cC$ determines 
       
   386 a functor $\psi_\cC$ from $\cJ(W)$ to the category of sets 
       
   387 (possibly with additional structure if $k=n$).
       
   388 For a decomposition $x = (X_a)$ in $\cJ(W)$, define $\psi_\cC(x)$ to be the subset
       
   389 \[
       
   390 	\psi_\cC(x) \sub \prod_a \cC(X_a)
       
   391 \]
       
   392 such that the restrictions to the various pieces of shared boundaries amongst the
       
   393 $X_a$ all agree.
       
   394 (Think fibered product.)
       
   395 If $x$ is a refinement of $y$, define a map $\psi_\cC(x)\to\psi_\cC(y)$
       
   396 via the composition maps of $\cC$.
       
   397 
       
   398 Finally, define $\cC(W)$ to be the colimit of $\psi_\cC$.
       
   399 In other words, for each decomposition $x$ there is a map
       
   400 $\psi_\cC(x)\to \cC(W)$, these maps are compatible with the refinement maps
       
   401 above, and $\cC(W)$ is universal with respect to these properties.
       
   402 
       
   403 $\cC(W)$ is functorial with respect to homeomorphisms of $k$-manifolds.
       
   404 
       
   405 It is easy to see that
       
   406 there are well-defined maps $\cC(W)\to\cC(\bd W)$, and that these maps
       
   407 comprise a natural transformation of functors.
       
   408 
       
   409 \nn{need to finish explaining why we have a system of fields;
       
   410 need to say more about ``homological" fields? 
       
   411 (actions of homeomorphisms);
       
   412 define $k$-cat $\cC(\cdot\times W)$}
       
   413 
       
   414 
       
   415 
       
   416 \subsection{Modules}
   355 
   417 
   356 Next we define [$A_\infty$] $n$-category modules (a.k.a.\ representations,
   418 Next we define [$A_\infty$] $n$-category modules (a.k.a.\ representations,
   357 a.k.a.\ actions).
   419 a.k.a.\ actions).
   358 The definition will be very similar to that of $n$-categories.
   420 The definition will be very similar to that of $n$-categories.
   359 
   421 
   557 of marked 1-balls, call them left-marked and right-marked,
   619 of marked 1-balls, call them left-marked and right-marked,
   558 and hence there are two types of modules, call them right modules and left modules.
   620 and hence there are two types of modules, call them right modules and left modules.
   559 In all other cases ($k>1$ or unoriented or $\text{Pin}_\pm$),
   621 In all other cases ($k>1$ or unoriented or $\text{Pin}_\pm$),
   560 there is no left/right module distinction.
   622 there is no left/right module distinction.
   561 
   623 
   562 \medskip
   624 
       
   625 \subsection{Modules as boundary labels}
       
   626 
       
   627 Let $\cC$ be an [$A_\infty$] $n$-category, let $W$ be a $k$-manifold ($k\le n$),
       
   628 and let $\cN = (\cN_i)$ be an assignment of a $\cC$ module $\cN_i$ to each boundary 
       
   629 component $\bd_i W$ of $W$.
       
   630 
       
   631 We will define a set $\cC(W, \cN)$ using a colimit construction similar to above.
       
   632 \nn{give ref}
       
   633 (If $k = n$ and our $k$-categories are enriched, then
       
   634 $\cC(W, \cN)$ will have additional structure; see below.)
       
   635 
       
   636 Define a permissible decomposition of $W$ to be a decomposition
       
   637 \[
       
   638 	W = (\bigcup_a X_a) \cup (\bigcup_{i,b} M_{ib}) ,
       
   639 \]
       
   640 where each $X_a$ is a plain $k$-ball (disjoint from $\bd W$) and
       
   641 each $M_{ib}$ is a marked $k$-ball intersecting $\bd_i W$,
       
   642 with $M_{ib}\cap\bd_i W$ being the marking.
       
   643 Given permissible decompositions $x$ and $y$, we say that $x$ is a refinement
       
   644 of $y$, or write $x \le y$, if each ball of $y$ is a union of balls of $x$.
       
   645 This defines a partial ordering $\cJ(W)$, which we will think of as a category.
       
   646 (The objects of $\cJ(D)$ are permissible decompositions of $W$, and there is a unique
       
   647 morphism from $x$ to $y$ if and only if $x$ is a refinement of $y$.)
       
   648 \nn{need figures}
       
   649 
       
   650 $\cN$ determines 
       
   651 a functor $\psi_\cN$ from $\cJ(W)$ to the category of sets 
       
   652 (possibly with additional structure if $k=n$).
       
   653 For a decomposition $x = (X_a, M_{ib})$ in $\cJ(W)$, define $\psi_\cN(x)$ to be the subset
       
   654 \[
       
   655 	\psi_\cN(x) \sub (\prod_a \cC(X_a)) \prod (\prod_{ib} \cN_i(M_{ib}))
       
   656 \]
       
   657 such that the restrictions to the various pieces of shared boundaries amongst the
       
   658 $X_a$ and $M_{ib}$ all agree.
       
   659 (Think fibered product.)
       
   660 If $x$ is a refinement of $y$, define a map $\psi_\cN(x)\to\psi_\cN(y)$
       
   661 via the gluing (composition or action) maps from $\cC$ and the $\cN_i$.
       
   662 
       
   663 Finally, define $\cC(W, \cN)$ to be the colimit of $\psi_\cN$.
       
   664 In other words, for each decomposition $x$ there is a map
       
   665 $\psi(x)\to \cC(W, \cN)$, these maps are compatible with the refinement maps
       
   666 above, and $\cC(W, \cN)$ is universal with respect to these properties.
       
   667 
       
   668 \nn{boundary restrictions, $k$-cat $\cC(\cdot\times W; N)$ etc.}
       
   669 
       
   670 \subsection{Tensor products}
   563 
   671 
   564 Next we consider tensor products (or, more generally, self tensor products
   672 Next we consider tensor products (or, more generally, self tensor products
   565 or coends).
   673 or coends).
   566 
   674 
       
   675 \nn{maybe ``tensor product" is not the best name?}
       
   676 
   567 \nn{start with (less general) tensor products; maybe change this later}
   677 \nn{start with (less general) tensor products; maybe change this later}
       
   678 
       
   679 ** \nn{stuff below needs to be rewritten (shortened), because of new subsections above}
   568 
   680 
   569 Let $\cM$ and $\cM'$ be modules for an $n$-category $\cC$.
   681 Let $\cM$ and $\cM'$ be modules for an $n$-category $\cC$.
   570 (If $k=1$ and manifolds are oriented, then one should be 
   682 (If $k=1$ and manifolds are oriented, then one should be 
   571 a left module and the other a right module.)
   683 a left module and the other a right module.)
   572 We will define an $n{-}1$-category $\cM\ot_\cC\cM'$, which depend (functorially)
   684 We will define an $n{-}1$-category $\cM\ot_\cC\cM'$, which depend (functorially)