pnas/pnas.tex
changeset 666 6b6c565bd76e
parent 665 1cfa95e6b8bb
child 667 0f45668726dd
equal deleted inserted replaced
665:1cfa95e6b8bb 666:6b6c565bd76e
   235 in a concrete version of the homotopy colimit.)
   235 in a concrete version of the homotopy colimit.)
   236 We then review some basic properties of the blob complex, and finish by showing how it
   236 We then review some basic properties of the blob complex, and finish by showing how it
   237 yields a higher categorical and higher dimensional generalization of Deligne's
   237 yields a higher categorical and higher dimensional generalization of Deligne's
   238 conjecture on Hochschild cochains and the little 2-disks operad.
   238 conjecture on Hochschild cochains and the little 2-disks operad.
   239 
   239 
   240 \nn{needs revision}
       
   241 Of course, there are currently many interesting alternative notions of $n$-category and of TQFT.
       
   242 We note that our $n$-categories are both more and less general
       
   243 than the ``fully dualizable" ones which play a prominent role in \cite{0905.0465}.
       
   244 They are more general in that we make no duality assumptions in the top dimension $n{+}1$.
       
   245 They are less general in that we impose stronger duality requirements in dimensions 0 through $n$.
       
   246 Thus our $n$-categories correspond to $(n{+}\epsilon)$-dimensional {\it unoriented} or {\it oriented} TQFTs, while
       
   247 Lurie's (fully dualizable) $n$-categories correspond to $(n{+}1)$-dimensional {\it framed} TQFTs.
       
   248 
       
   249 At several points we only sketch an argument briefly; full details can be found in \cite{1009.5025}. 
   240 At several points we only sketch an argument briefly; full details can be found in \cite{1009.5025}. 
   250 In this paper we attempt to give a clear view of the big picture without getting 
   241 In this paper we attempt to give a clear view of the big picture without getting 
   251 bogged down in technical details.
   242 bogged down in technical details.
   252 
   243 
   253 
   244 
   269 %\nn{maybe: the typical n-cat definition tries to do two things at once: (1) give a list of basic properties
   260 %\nn{maybe: the typical n-cat definition tries to do two things at once: (1) give a list of basic properties
   270 %which are weak enough to include the basic examples and strong enough to support the proofs
   261 %which are weak enough to include the basic examples and strong enough to support the proofs
   271 %of the main theorems; and (2) specify a minimal set of generators and/or axioms.
   262 %of the main theorems; and (2) specify a minimal set of generators and/or axioms.
   272 %We separate these two tasks, and address only the first, which becomes much easier when not burdened by the second.
   263 %We separate these two tasks, and address only the first, which becomes much easier when not burdened by the second.
   273 %More specifically, life is easier when working with maximal, rather than minimal, collections of axioms.}
   264 %More specifically, life is easier when working with maximal, rather than minimal, collections of axioms.}
       
   265 
       
   266 Of course, there are currently many interesting alternative notions of $n$-category.
       
   267 We note that our $n$-categories are both more and less general
       
   268 than the ``fully dualizable" ones which play a prominent role in \cite{0905.0465}.
       
   269 They are more general in that we make no duality assumptions in the top dimension $n{+}1$.
       
   270 They are less general in that we impose stronger duality requirements in dimensions 0 through $n$.
       
   271 Thus our $n$-categories correspond to $(n{+}\epsilon)$-dimensional {\it unoriented} or {\it oriented} TQFTs, while
       
   272 Lurie's (fully dualizable) $n$-categories correspond to $(n{+}1)$-dimensional {\it framed} TQFTs.
   274 
   273 
   275 We will define two variations simultaneously,  as all but one of the axioms are identical in the two cases.
   274 We will define two variations simultaneously,  as all but one of the axioms are identical in the two cases.
   276 These variations are ``plain $n$-categories", where homeomorphisms fixing the boundary
   275 These variations are ``plain $n$-categories", where homeomorphisms fixing the boundary
   277 act trivially on the sets associated to $n$-balls
   276 act trivially on the sets associated to $n$-balls
   278 (and these sets are usually vector spaces or more generally modules over a commutative ring)
   277 (and these sets are usually vector spaces or more generally modules over a commutative ring)