text/blobdef.tex
changeset 464 6c760675d461
parent 455 8e62bd633a98
child 465 adc5f2722062
equal deleted inserted replaced
463:982eca6e2663 464:6c760675d461
   132 finite collection of triples $\{(B_i, X_i, Y_i)\}_{i=1,\ldots, k}$ where $B_i$ is an $n$-ball, $X_i$ is some topological space, and $Y_i$ is pair of disjoint homeomorphic $n-1$-manifolds in the boundary of $X_{i-1}$ (for convenience, $X_0 = Y_1 = \eset$), such that $X_{i+1} = X_i \cup_{Y_i} B_i$ and $X = X_k \cup_{Y_k} B_k$.
   132 finite collection of triples $\{(B_i, X_i, Y_i)\}_{i=1,\ldots, k}$ where $B_i$ is an $n$-ball, $X_i$ is some topological space, and $Y_i$ is pair of disjoint homeomorphic $n-1$-manifolds in the boundary of $X_{i-1}$ (for convenience, $X_0 = Y_1 = \eset$), such that $X_{i+1} = X_i \cup_{Y_i} B_i$ and $X = X_k \cup_{Y_k} B_k$.
   133 
   133 
   134 Equivalently, we can define a ball decomposition inductively. A ball decomposition of $X$ is a topological space $X'$ along with a pair of disjoint homeomorphic $n-1$-manifolds $Y \subset \bdy X$, so $X = X' \bigcup_Y \selfarrow$, and $X'$ is either a disjoint union of balls, or a topological space equipped with a ball decomposition.
   134 Equivalently, we can define a ball decomposition inductively. A ball decomposition of $X$ is a topological space $X'$ along with a pair of disjoint homeomorphic $n-1$-manifolds $Y \subset \bdy X$, so $X = X' \bigcup_Y \selfarrow$, and $X'$ is either a disjoint union of balls, or a topological space equipped with a ball decomposition.
   135 \end{defn}
   135 \end{defn}
   136 
   136 
       
   137 Even though our definition of a system of fields only associates vector spaces to $n$-manifolds, we can easily extend this to any topological space admitting a ball decomposition.
       
   138 \begin{defn}
       
   139 Given an $n$-dimensional system of fields $\cF$, its extension to a topological space $X$ admitting an $n$-ball decomposition is \todo{}
       
   140 \end{defn}
       
   141 \todo{This is well defined}
   137 
   142 
   138 Before describing the general case we should say more precisely what we mean by 
   143 Before describing the general case we should say more precisely what we mean by 
   139 disjoint and nested blobs.
   144 disjoint and nested blobs.
   140 Disjoint will mean disjoint interiors.
   145 Two blobs are disjoint if they have disjoint interiors.
   141 Nested blobs are allowed to coincide, or to have overlapping boundaries.
   146 Nested blobs are allowed to have overlapping boundaries, or indeed to coincide.
   142 Blob are allowed to intersect $\bd X$.
   147 Blob are allowed to meet $\bd X$.
       
   148 
   143 However, we require of any collection of blobs $B_1,\ldots,B_k \subseteq X$ that
   149 However, we require of any collection of blobs $B_1,\ldots,B_k \subseteq X$ that
   144 $X$ is decomposable along the union of the boundaries of the blobs.
   150 $X$ is decomposable along the union of the boundaries of the blobs.
   145 \nn{need to say more here.  we want to be able to glue blob diagrams, but avoid pathological
   151 \nn{need to say more here.  we want to be able to glue blob diagrams, but avoid pathological
   146 behavior}
   152 behavior}
   147 \nn{need to allow the case where $B\to X$ is not an embedding
   153 \nn{need to allow the case where $B\to X$ is not an embedding