24 %Fix a top dimension $n$, and a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$ whose objects are sets. While reading the definition, you should just think about the case $\cS = \Set$ with cartesian product, until you reach the discussion of a \emph{linear system of fields} later in this section, where $\cS = \Vect$, and \S \ref{sec:homological-fields}, where $\cS = \Kom$. |
24 %Fix a top dimension $n$, and a symmetric monoidal category $\cS$ whose objects are sets. While reading the definition, you should just think about the case $\cS = \Set$ with cartesian product, until you reach the discussion of a \emph{linear system of fields} later in this section, where $\cS = \Vect$, and \S \ref{sec:homological-fields}, where $\cS = \Kom$. |
25 |
25 |
26 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$ |
26 A $n$-dimensional {\it system of fields} in $\cS$ |
27 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$ |
27 is a collection of functors $\cC_k : \cM_k \to \Set$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$ |
28 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below. |
28 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below. |
29 |
|
30 \nn{refer somewhere to my TQFT notes \cite{kw:tqft}} |
|
31 |
29 |
32 Before finishing the definition of fields, we give two motivating examples |
30 Before finishing the definition of fields, we give two motivating examples |
33 (actually, families of examples) of systems of fields. |
31 (actually, families of examples) of systems of fields. |
34 |
32 |
35 The first examples: Fix a target space $B$, and let $\cC(X)$ be the set of continuous maps |
33 The first examples: Fix a target space $B$, and let $\cC(X)$ be the set of continuous maps |
388 \item A local relation field $u \in U(B; c)$ |
386 \item A local relation field $u \in U(B; c)$ |
389 (same $c$ as previous bullet). |
387 (same $c$ as previous bullet). |
390 \end{itemize} |
388 \end{itemize} |
391 (See Figure \ref{blob1diagram}.) |
389 (See Figure \ref{blob1diagram}.) |
392 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
390 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
393 \mathfig{.9}{tempkw/blob1diagram} |
391 \mathfig{.9}{definition/single-blob} |
394 \end{equation*}\caption{A 1-blob diagram.}\label{blob1diagram}\end{figure} |
392 \end{equation*}\caption{A 1-blob diagram.}\label{blob1diagram}\end{figure} |
395 In order to get the linear structure correct, we (officially) define |
393 In order to get the linear structure correct, we (officially) define |
396 \[ |
394 \[ |
397 \bc_1(X) \deq \bigoplus_B \bigoplus_c U(B; c) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B; c) . |
395 \bc_1(X) \deq \bigoplus_B \bigoplus_c U(B; c) \otimes \lf(X \setmin B; c) . |
398 \] |
396 \] |
421 A disjoint 2-blob diagram consists of |
419 A disjoint 2-blob diagram consists of |
422 \begin{itemize} |
420 \begin{itemize} |
423 \item A pair of closed balls (blobs) $B_0, B_1 \sub X$ with disjoint interiors. |
421 \item A pair of closed balls (blobs) $B_0, B_1 \sub X$ with disjoint interiors. |
424 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin (B_0 \cup B_1); c_0, c_1)$ |
422 \item A field $r \in \cC(X \setmin (B_0 \cup B_1); c_0, c_1)$ |
425 (where $c_i \in \cC(\bd B_i)$). |
423 (where $c_i \in \cC(\bd B_i)$). |
426 \item Local relation fields $u_i \in U(B_i; c_i)$, $i=1,2$. |
424 \item Local relation fields $u_i \in U(B_i; c_i)$, $i=1,2$. \nn{We're inconsistent with the indexes -- are they 0,1 or 1,2? I'd prefer 1,2.} |
427 \end{itemize} |
425 \end{itemize} |
428 (See Figure \ref{blob2ddiagram}.) |
426 (See Figure \ref{blob2ddiagram}.) |
429 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
427 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
430 \mathfig{.9}{tempkw/blob2ddiagram} |
428 \mathfig{.9}{definition/disjoint-blobs} |
431 \end{equation*}\caption{A disjoint 2-blob diagram.}\label{blob2ddiagram}\end{figure} |
429 \end{equation*}\caption{A disjoint 2-blob diagram.}\label{blob2ddiagram}\end{figure} |
432 We also identify $(B_0, B_1, u_0, u_1, r)$ with $-(B_1, B_0, u_1, u_0, r)$; |
430 We also identify $(B_0, B_1, u_0, u_1, r)$ with $-(B_1, B_0, u_1, u_0, r)$; |
433 reversing the order of the blobs changes the sign. |
431 reversing the order of the blobs changes the sign. |
434 Define $\bd(B_0, B_1, u_0, u_1, r) = |
432 Define $\bd(B_0, B_1, u_0, u_1, r) = |
435 (B_1, u_1, u_0\bullet r) - (B_0, u_0, u_1\bullet r) \in \bc_1(X)$. |
433 (B_1, u_1, u_0\bullet r) - (B_0, u_0, u_1\bullet r) \in \bc_1(X)$. |
445 (for some $c_0 \in \cC(\bd B_0)$), which is splittable along $\bd B_1$. |
443 (for some $c_0 \in \cC(\bd B_0)$), which is splittable along $\bd B_1$. |
446 \item A local relation field $u_0 \in U(B_0; c_0)$. |
444 \item A local relation field $u_0 \in U(B_0; c_0)$. |
447 \end{itemize} |
445 \end{itemize} |
448 (See Figure \ref{blob2ndiagram}.) |
446 (See Figure \ref{blob2ndiagram}.) |
449 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
447 \begin{figure}[!ht]\begin{equation*} |
450 \mathfig{.9}{tempkw/blob2ndiagram} |
448 \mathfig{.9}{definition/nested-blobs} |
451 \end{equation*}\caption{A nested 2-blob diagram.}\label{blob2ndiagram}\end{figure} |
449 \end{equation*}\caption{A nested 2-blob diagram.}\label{blob2ndiagram}\end{figure} |
452 Let $r = r_1 \bullet r'$, where $r_1 \in \cC(B_1 \setmin B_0; c_0, c_1)$ |
450 Let $r = r_1 \bullet r'$, where $r_1 \in \cC(B_1 \setmin B_0; c_0, c_1)$ |
453 (for some $c_1 \in \cC(B_1)$) and |
451 (for some $c_1 \in \cC(B_1)$) and |
454 $r' \in \cC(X \setmin B_1; c_1)$. |
452 $r' \in \cC(X \setmin B_1; c_1)$. |
455 Define $\bd(B_0, B_1, u_0, r) = (B_1, u_0\bullet r_1, r') - (B_0, u_0, r)$. |
453 Define $\bd(B_0, B_1, u_0, r) = (B_1, u_0\bullet r_1, r') - (B_0, u_0, r)$. |