pnas/pnas.tex
changeset 670 7a4fc5a873ac
parent 669 c21da249a015
child 671 6088d0b8611b
equal deleted inserted replaced
669:c21da249a015 670:7a4fc5a873ac
   522 For each fixed $\bdy W \subset \bdy X \times \bbR^\infty$, we 
   522 For each fixed $\bdy W \subset \bdy X \times \bbR^\infty$, we 
   523 topologize the set of submanifolds by ambient isotopy rel boundary.
   523 topologize the set of submanifolds by ambient isotopy rel boundary.
   524 
   524 
   525 \subsection{The blob complex}
   525 \subsection{The blob complex}
   526 \subsubsection{Decompositions of manifolds}
   526 \subsubsection{Decompositions of manifolds}
       
   527 Our description of an $n$-category associates data to each $k$-ball for $k\leq n$. In order to define invariants of $n$-manifolds, we will need a class of decompositions of manifolds into balls. We present one choice here, but alternatives of varying degrees of generality exist, for example handle decompositions or piecewise-linear CW-complexes \cite{1009.4227}.
   527 
   528 
   528 A \emph{ball decomposition} of a $k$-manifold $W$ is a 
   529 A \emph{ball decomposition} of a $k$-manifold $W$ is a 
   529 sequence of gluings $M_0\to M_1\to\cdots\to M_m = W$ such that $M_0$ is a disjoint union of balls
   530 sequence of gluings $M_0\to M_1\to\cdots\to M_m = W$ such that $M_0$ is a disjoint union of balls
   530 $\du_a X_a$ and each $M_i$ is a manifold.
   531 $\du_a X_a$ and each $M_i$ is a manifold.
   531 If $X_a$ is some component of $M_0$, its image in $W$ need not be a ball; $\bd X_a$ may have been glued to itself.
   532 If $X_a$ is some component of $M_0$, its image in $W$ need not be a ball; $\bd X_a$ may have been glued to itself.
   533 \[
   534 \[
   534 	\coprod_a X_a \to W,
   535 	\coprod_a X_a \to W,
   535 \]
   536 \]
   536 which can be completed to a ball decomposition $\du_a X_a = M_0\to\cdots\to M_m = W$.
   537 which can be completed to a ball decomposition $\du_a X_a = M_0\to\cdots\to M_m = W$.
   537 A permissible decomposition is weaker than a ball decomposition; we forget the order in which the balls
   538 A permissible decomposition is weaker than a ball decomposition; we forget the order in which the balls
   538 are glued up to yield $W$, and just require that there is some non-pathological way to do this.
   539 are glued up to yield $W$, and just require that there is some non-pathological way to do this. 
   539 
   540 
   540 Given permissible decompositions $x = \{X_a\}$ and $y = \{Y_b\}$ of $W$, we say that $x$ is a refinement
   541 Given permissible decompositions $x = \{X_a\}$ and $y = \{Y_b\}$ of $W$, we say that $x$ is a refinement
   541 of $y$, or write $x \le y$, if there is a ball decomposition $\du_a X_a = M_0\to\cdots\to M_m = W$
   542 of $y$, or write $x \le y$, if there is a ball decomposition $\du_a X_a = M_0\to\cdots\to M_m = W$
   542 with $\du_b Y_b = M_i$ for some $i$.
   543 with $\du_b Y_b = M_i$ for some $i$.
   543 
   544