text/ncat.tex
changeset 334 7b632b53eb45
parent 331 956f373f6ff6
parent 333 3e61a9197613
child 335 9bf409eb5040
equal deleted inserted replaced
331:956f373f6ff6 334:7b632b53eb45
    84 boundary of a morphism.
    84 boundary of a morphism.
    85 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres.
    85 Morphisms are modeled on balls, so their boundaries are modeled on spheres.
    86 In other words, we need to extend the functors $\cC_{k-1}$ from balls to spheres, for 
    86 In other words, we need to extend the functors $\cC_{k-1}$ from balls to spheres, for 
    87 $1\le k \le n$.
    87 $1\le k \le n$.
    88 At first it might seem that we need another axiom for this, but in fact once we have
    88 At first it might seem that we need another axiom for this, but in fact once we have
    89 all the axioms in the subsection for $0$ through $k-1$ we can use a coend
    89 all the axioms in the subsection for $0$ through $k-1$ we can use a colimit
    90 construction, as described in Subsection \ref{ss:ncat-coend} below, to extend $\cC_{k-1}$
    90 construction, as described in Subsection \ref{ss:ncat-coend} below, to extend $\cC_{k-1}$
    91 to spheres (and any other manifolds):
    91 to spheres (and any other manifolds):
    92 
    92 
    93 \begin{prop}
    93 \begin{prop}
    94 \label{axiom:spheres}
    94 \label{axiom:spheres}
    95 For each $1 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cC_{k-1}$ from 
    95 For each $1 \le k \le n$, we have a functor $\cl{\cC}_{k-1}$ from 
    96 the category of $k{-}1$-spheres and 
    96 the category of $k{-}1$-spheres and 
    97 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
    97 homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.
    98 \end{prop}
    98 \end{prop}
    99 
    99 
   100 We postpone the proof \todo{} of this result until after we've actually given all the axioms. Note that defining this functor for some $k$ only requires the data described in Axiom \ref{axiom:morphisms} at level $k$, along with the data described in the other Axioms at lower levels. 
   100 We postpone the proof \todo{} of this result until after we've actually given all the axioms. Note that defining this functor for some $k$ only requires the data described in Axiom \ref{axiom:morphisms} at level $k$, along with the data described in the other Axioms at lower levels. 
   101 
   101 
   102 %In fact, the functors for spheres are entirely determined by the functors for balls and the subsequent axioms. (In particular, $\cC(S^k)$ is the colimit of $\cC$ applied to decompositions of $S^k$ into balls.) However, it is easiest to think of it as additional data at this point.
   102 %In fact, the functors for spheres are entirely determined by the functors for balls and the subsequent axioms. (In particular, $\cC(S^k)$ is the colimit of $\cC$ applied to decompositions of $S^k$ into balls.) However, it is easiest to think of it as additional data at this point.
   103 
   103 
   104 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries]\label{nca-boundary}
   104 \begin{axiom}[Boundaries]\label{nca-boundary}
   105 For each $k$-ball $X$, we have a map of sets $\bd: \cC_k(X)\to \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$.
   105 For each $k$-ball $X$, we have a map of sets $\bd: \cC_k(X)\to \cl{\cC}_{k-1}(\bd X)$.
   106 These maps, for various $X$, comprise a natural transformation of functors.
   106 These maps, for various $X$, comprise a natural transformation of functors.
   107 \end{axiom}
   107 \end{axiom}
   108 
   108 
   109 (Note that the first ``$\bd$" above is part of the data for the category, 
   109 (Note that the first ``$\bd$" above is part of the data for the category, 
   110 while the second is the ordinary boundary of manifolds.)
   110 while the second is the ordinary boundary of manifolds.)
   111 
   111 
   112 Given $c\in\cC(\bd(X))$, we will write $\cC(X; c)$ for $\bd^{-1}(c)$, those morphisms with specified boundary $c$.
   112 Given $c\in\cl{\cC}(\bd(X))$, we will write $\cC(X; c)$ for $\bd^{-1}(c)$, those morphisms with specified boundary $c$.
   113 
   113 
   114 Most of the examples of $n$-categories we are interested in are enriched in the following sense.
   114 Most of the examples of $n$-categories we are interested in are enriched in the following sense.
   115 The various sets of $n$-morphisms $\cC(X; c)$, for all $n$-balls $X$ and
   115 The various sets of $n$-morphisms $\cC(X; c)$, for all $n$-balls $X$ and
   116 all $c\in \cC(\bd X)$, have the structure of an object in some auxiliary symmetric monoidal category
   116 all $c\in \cl{\cC}(\bd X)$, have the structure of an object in some auxiliary symmetric monoidal category
   117 (e.g.\ vector spaces, or modules over some ring, or chain complexes),
   117 (e.g.\ vector spaces, or modules over some ring, or chain complexes),
   118 and all the structure maps of the $n$-category should be compatible with the auxiliary
   118 and all the structure maps of the $n$-category should be compatible with the auxiliary
   119 category structure.
   119 category structure.
   120 Note that this auxiliary structure is only in dimension $n$;
   120 Note that this auxiliary structure is only in dimension $n$;
   121 $\cC(Y; c)$ is just a plain set if $\dim(Y) < n$.
   121 $\cC(Y; c)$ is just a plain set if $\dim(Y) < n$.
   140 
   140 
   141 We have just argued that the boundary of a morphism has no preferred splitting into
   141 We have just argued that the boundary of a morphism has no preferred splitting into
   142 domain and range, but the converse meets with our approval.
   142 domain and range, but the converse meets with our approval.
   143 That is, given compatible domain and range, we should be able to combine them into
   143 That is, given compatible domain and range, we should be able to combine them into
   144 the full boundary of a morphism.
   144 the full boundary of a morphism.
   145 The following proposition follows from the coend construction used to define $\cC_{k-1}$
   145 The following proposition follows from the colimit construction used to define $\cl{\cC}_{k-1}$
   146 on spheres.
   146 on spheres.
   147 
   147 
   148 \begin{prop}[Boundary from domain and range]
   148 \begin{prop}[Boundary from domain and range]
   149 Let $S = B_1 \cup_E B_2$, where $S$ is a $k{-}1$-sphere $(1\le k\le n)$,
   149 Let $S = B_1 \cup_E B_2$, where $S$ is a $k{-}1$-sphere $(1\le k\le n)$,
   150 $B_i$ is a $k{-}1$-ball, and $E = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}2$-sphere (Figure \ref{blah3}).
   150 $B_i$ is a $k{-}1$-ball, and $E = B_1\cap B_2$ is a $k{-}2$-sphere (Figure \ref{blah3}).
   151 Let $\cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2)$ denote the fibered product of the 
   151 Let $\cC(B_1) \times_{\cl{\cC}(E)} \cC(B_2)$ denote the fibered product of the 
   152 two maps $\bd: \cC(B_i)\to \cC(E)$.
   152 two maps $\bd: \cC(B_i)\to \cl{\cC}(E)$.
   153 Then we have an injective map
   153 Then we have an injective map
   154 \[
   154 \[
   155 	\gl_E : \cC(B_1) \times_{\cC(E)} \cC(B_2) \into \cC(S)
   155 	\gl_E : \cC(B_1) \times_{\\cl{cC}(E)} \cC(B_2) \into \cl{\cC}(S)
   156 \]
   156 \]
   157 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms.
   157 which is natural with respect to the actions of homeomorphisms.
   158 (When $k=1$ we stipulate that $\cC(E)$ is a point, so that the above fibered product
   158 (When $k=1$ we stipulate that $\cl{\cC}(E)$ is a point, so that the above fibered product
   159 becomes a normal product.)
   159 becomes a normal product.)
   160 \end{prop}
   160 \end{prop}
   161 
   161 
   162 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   162 \begin{figure}[!ht]
   163 $$
   163 $$
   164 \begin{tikzpicture}[%every label/.style={green}
   164 \begin{tikzpicture}[%every label/.style={green}
   165 					]
   165 ]
   166 \node[fill=black, circle, label=below:$E$, inner sep=2pt](S) at (0,0) {};
   166 \node[fill=black, circle, label=below:$E$, inner sep=2pt](S) at (0,0) {};
   167 \node[fill=black, circle, label=above:$E$, inner sep=2pt](N) at (0,2) {};
   167 \node[fill=black, circle, label=above:$E$, inner sep=2pt](N) at (0,2) {};
   168 \draw (S) arc  (-90:90:1);
   168 \draw (S) arc  (-90:90:1);
   169 \draw (N) arc  (90:270:1);
   169 \draw (N) arc  (90:270:1);
   170 \node[left] at (-1,1) {$B_1$};
   170 \node[left] at (-1,1) {$B_1$};
   173 $$
   173 $$
   174 \caption{Combining two balls to get a full boundary.}\label{blah3}\end{figure}
   174 \caption{Combining two balls to get a full boundary.}\label{blah3}\end{figure}
   175 
   175 
   176 Note that we insist on injectivity above.
   176 Note that we insist on injectivity above.
   177 
   177 
   178 Let $\cC(S)_E$ denote the image of $\gl_E$.
   178 Let $\cl{\cC}(S)_E$ denote the image of $\gl_E$.
   179 We will refer to elements of $\cC(S)_E$ as ``splittable along $E$" or ``transverse to $E$". 
   179 We will refer to elements of $\\cl{cC}(S)_E$ as ``splittable along $E$" or ``transverse to $E$". 
   180 
   180 
   181 If $X$ is a $k$-ball and $E \sub \bd X$ splits $\bd X$ into two $k{-}1$-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$
   181 If $X$ is a $k$-ball and $E \sub \bd X$ splits $\bd X$ into two $k{-}1$-balls $B_1$ and $B_2$
   182 as above, then we define $\cC(X)_E = \bd^{-1}(\cC(\bd X)_E)$.
   182 as above, then we define $\cC(X)_E = \bd^{-1}(\cl{\cC}(\bd X)_E)$.
   183 
   183 
   184 We will call the projection $\cC(S)_E \to \cC(B_i)$
   184 We will call the projection $\cl{\cC}(S)_E \to \cC(B_i)$
   185 a {\it restriction} map and write $\res_{B_i}(a)$
   185 a {\it restriction} map and write $\res_{B_i}(a)$
   186 (or simply $\res(a)$ when there is no ambiguity), for $a\in \cC(S)_E$.
   186 (or simply $\res(a)$ when there is no ambiguity), for $a\in \cl{\cC}(S)_E$.
   187 More generally, we also include under the rubric ``restriction map" the
   187 More generally, we also include under the rubric ``restriction map" the
   188 the boundary maps of Axiom \ref{nca-boundary} above,
   188 the boundary maps of Axiom \ref{nca-boundary} above,
   189 another class of maps introduced after Axiom \ref{nca-assoc} below, as well as any composition
   189 another class of maps introduced after Axiom \ref{nca-assoc} below, as well as any composition
   190 of restriction maps.
   190 of restriction maps.
   191 In particular, we have restriction maps $\cC(X)_E \to \cC(B_i)$
   191 In particular, we have restriction maps $\cC(X)_E \to \cC(B_i)$