text/deligne.tex
changeset 295 7e14f79814cd
parent 292 7d0c63a9ce05
child 297 c1971082f94b
child 298 25e551fed344
equal deleted inserted replaced
294:6a43367bf06b 295:7e14f79814cd
    79 (By convention, $M_i = N_i = \emptyset$ if $i <1$ or $i>k$.)
    79 (By convention, $M_i = N_i = \emptyset$ if $i <1$ or $i>k$.)
    80 We call $R_0$ the outer incoming manifold and $R_{k+1}$ the outer outgoing manifold
    80 We call $R_0$ the outer incoming manifold and $R_{k+1}$ the outer outgoing manifold
    81 \item Homeomorphisms $f_i : R_i\cup N_i\to R_{i+1}\cup M_{i+1}$, $0\le i \le k$.
    81 \item Homeomorphisms $f_i : R_i\cup N_i\to R_{i+1}\cup M_{i+1}$, $0\le i \le k$.
    82 \end{itemize}
    82 \end{itemize}
    83 We can think of the above data as encoding the union of the mapping cylinders $C(f_0),\ldots,C(f_k)$,
    83 We can think of the above data as encoding the union of the mapping cylinders $C(f_0),\ldots,C(f_k)$,
    84 with $C(f_i)$ glued to $C(f_{i+1})$ along $R_{i+1}$.
    84 with $C(f_i)$ glued to $C(f_{i+1})$ along $R_{i+1}$
    85 \nn{need figure}
    85 (see Figure xxxx).
       
    86 \nn{also need to revise outer labels of older fig}
       
    87 The $n$-manifolds are the ``$n$-dimensional graph" and the $I$ direction of the mapping cylinders is the ``fat" part.
       
    88 We regard two such fat graphs as the same if there is a homeomorphism between them which is the 
       
    89 identity on the boundary and which preserves the 1-dimensional fibers coming from the mapping
       
    90 cylinders.
       
    91 More specifically, we impose the following two equivalence relations:
       
    92 \begin{itemize}
       
    93 \item If $g:R_i\to R_i$ is a homeomorphism, we can replace
       
    94 \[
       
    95 	(\ldots, f_{i-1}, f_i, \ldots) \to (\ldots, g\circ f_{i-1}, f_i\circ g^{-1}, \ldots) .
       
    96 \]
       
    97 (See Figure xxx.)
       
    98 \item If $M_i = M'_i \du M''_i$ and $N_i = N'_i \du N''_i$ (and there is a
       
    99 compatible disjoint union of $\bd M = \bd N$), we can replace
       
   100 \begin{eqnarray*}
       
   101 	(\ldots, M_{i-1}, M_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, M_{i-1}, M'_i, M''_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
       
   102 	(\ldots, N_{i-1}, N_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, N_{i-1}, N'_i, N''_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
       
   103 	(\ldots, R_{i-1}, R_i, R_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& 
       
   104 						(\ldots, R_{i-1}, R_i\cup M''_i, R_i\cup N'_i, R_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
       
   105 	(\ldots, f_{i-1}, f_i, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, f_{i-1}, \rm{id}, f_i, \ldots) .
       
   106 \end{eqnarray*}
       
   107 (See Figure xxxx.)
       
   108 \end{itemize}
    86 
   109 
       
   110 Note that the second equivalence increases the number of holes (or arity) by 1.
       
   111 We can make a similar identification with the rolls of $M'_i$ and $M''_i$ reversed.
       
   112 In terms of the ``sequence of surgeries" picture, this says that if two successive surgeries
       
   113 do not overlap, we can perform them in reverse order or simultaneously.
    87 
   114 
       
   115 \nn{operad structure (need to ntro mroe terminology above}
    88 
   116 
    89 \nn{*** resume revising here}
   117 \nn{*** resume revising here}
    90 
   118 
    91 
   119 
    92 
   120