text/evmap.tex
changeset 358 8589275ac65b
parent 357 bbd55b6e9650
child 359 6224e50c9311
equal deleted inserted replaced
357:bbd55b6e9650 358:8589275ac65b
   501 
   501 
   502 \medskip
   502 \medskip
   503 
   503 
   504 Let $R_*$ be the chain complex with a generating 0-chain for each non-negative
   504 Let $R_*$ be the chain complex with a generating 0-chain for each non-negative
   505 integer and a generating 1-chain connecting each adjacent pair $(j, j+1)$.
   505 integer and a generating 1-chain connecting each adjacent pair $(j, j+1)$.
       
   506 (So $R_*$ is a simplicial version of the non-negative reals.)
   506 Denote the 0-chains by $j$ (for $j$ a non-negative integer) and the 1-chain connecting $j$ and $j+1$
   507 Denote the 0-chains by $j$ (for $j$ a non-negative integer) and the 1-chain connecting $j$ and $j+1$
   507 by $\iota_j$.
   508 by $\iota_j$.
   508 Define a map (homotopy equivalence)
   509 Define a map (homotopy equivalence)
   509 \[
   510 \[
   510 	\sigma: R_*\ot CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to CH_*(X, X)\ot \bc_*(X)
   511 	\sigma: R_*\ot CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to CH_*(X, X)\ot \bc_*(X)
   583 $e_{m+1}$ candidates is contained in the corresponding subcomplex for $e_m$.
   584 $e_{m+1}$ candidates is contained in the corresponding subcomplex for $e_m$.
   584 \nn{now should remark that we have not, in fact, produced a contractible set of maps,
   585 \nn{now should remark that we have not, in fact, produced a contractible set of maps,
   585 but we have come very close}
   586 but we have come very close}
   586 \nn{better: change statement of thm}
   587 \nn{better: change statement of thm}
   587 
   588 
       
   589 \medskip
       
   590 
       
   591 Next we show that the action maps are compatible with gluing.
       
   592 Let $G^m_*$ and $\ol{G}^m_*$ be the complexes, as above, used for defining
       
   593 the action maps $e_{X\sgl}$ and $e_X$.
       
   594 The gluing map $X\sgl\to X$ induces a map
       
   595 \[
       
   596 	\gl: R_*\ot CH_*(X\sgl, X \sgl) \otimes \bc_*(X \sgl) \to R_*\ot CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X) ,
       
   597 \]
       
   598 and it is easy to see that $\gl(G^m_*)\sub \ol{G}^m_*$.
       
   599 From this it follows that the diagram in the statement of Proposition \ref{CHprop} commutes.
       
   600 
       
   601 \medskip
       
   602 
       
   603 Finally we show that the action maps defined above are independent of
       
   604 the choice of metric (up to iterated homotopy).
   588 
   605 
   589 \nn{...}
   606 \nn{...}
   590 
   607 
   591 
   608 
   592 \medskip\hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip
   609 \medskip\hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip
   597 \item Independence of metric, $\ep_i$, $\delta_i$:
   614 \item Independence of metric, $\ep_i$, $\delta_i$:
   598 For a different metric etc. let $\hat{G}^{i,m}$ denote the alternate subcomplexes
   615 For a different metric etc. let $\hat{G}^{i,m}$ denote the alternate subcomplexes
   599 and $\hat{N}_{i,l}$ the alternate neighborhoods.
   616 and $\hat{N}_{i,l}$ the alternate neighborhoods.
   600 Main idea is that for all $i$ there exists sufficiently large $k$ such that
   617 Main idea is that for all $i$ there exists sufficiently large $k$ such that
   601 $\hat{N}_{k,l} \sub N_{i,l}$, and similarly with the roles of $N$ and $\hat{N}$ reversed.
   618 $\hat{N}_{k,l} \sub N_{i,l}$, and similarly with the roles of $N$ and $\hat{N}$ reversed.
   602 \item prove gluing compatibility, as in statement of main thm (this is relatively easy)
       
   603 \end{itemize}
   619 \end{itemize}
   604 
   620 
   605 \nn{to be continued....}
   621 \nn{to be continued....}
   606 
   622 
   607 \end{proof}
   623 \end{proof}