pnas/pnas.tex
changeset 646 895b57485dfa
parent 645 4e816ca8b5e2
child 647 f3da9af1d8c7
equal deleted inserted replaced
645:4e816ca8b5e2 646:895b57485dfa
   357 or if $k=n$ and we are in the $A_\infty$ case, 
   357 or if $k=n$ and we are in the $A_\infty$ case, 
   358 we require that $\gl_Y$ is injective.
   358 we require that $\gl_Y$ is injective.
   359 (For $k=n$ in the plain (non-$A_\infty$) case, see below.)
   359 (For $k=n$ in the plain (non-$A_\infty$) case, see below.)
   360 \end{axiom}
   360 \end{axiom}
   361 
   361 
   362 \begin{axiom}[Strict associativity] \label{nca-assoc}
   362 \begin{axiom}[Strict associativity] \label{nca-assoc}\label{axiom:associativity}
   363 The gluing maps above are strictly associative.
   363 The gluing maps above are strictly associative.
   364 Given any decomposition of a ball $B$ into smaller balls
   364 Given any decomposition of a ball $B$ into smaller balls
   365 $$\bigsqcup B_i \to B,$$ 
   365 $$\bigsqcup B_i \to B,$$ 
   366 any sequence of gluings (where all the intermediate steps are also disjoint unions of balls) yields the same result.
   366 any sequence of gluings (where all the intermediate steps are also disjoint unions of balls) yields the same result.
   367 \end{axiom}
   367 \end{axiom}
   495 There is an $A_\infty$ analogue enriched in topological spaces, where at the top level we take all such submanifolds, rather than homeomorphism classes. For each fixed $\bdy W \subset \bdy X \times \bbR^\infty$, we can topologize the set of submanifolds by ambient isotopy rel boundary.
   495 There is an $A_\infty$ analogue enriched in topological spaces, where at the top level we take all such submanifolds, rather than homeomorphism classes. For each fixed $\bdy W \subset \bdy X \times \bbR^\infty$, we can topologize the set of submanifolds by ambient isotopy rel boundary.
   496 
   496 
   497 \subsection{The blob complex}
   497 \subsection{The blob complex}
   498 \subsubsection{Decompositions of manifolds}
   498 \subsubsection{Decompositions of manifolds}
   499 
   499 
   500 A \emph{ball decomposition} of $W$ is a 
   500 A \emph{ball decomposition} of a $k$-manifold $W$ is a 
   501 sequence of gluings $M_0\to M_1\to\cdots\to M_m = W$ such that $M_0$ is a disjoint union of balls
   501 sequence of gluings $M_0\to M_1\to\cdots\to M_m = W$ such that $M_0$ is a disjoint union of balls
   502 $\du_a X_a$ and each $M_i$ is a manifold.
   502 $\du_a X_a$ and each $M_i$ is a manifold.
   503 If $X_a$ is some component of $M_0$, its image in $W$ need not be a ball; $\bd X_a$ may have been glued to itself.
   503 If $X_a$ is some component of $M_0$, its image in $W$ need not be a ball; $\bd X_a$ may have been glued to itself.
   504 A {\it permissible decomposition} of $W$ is a map
   504 A {\it permissible decomposition} of $W$ is a map
   505 \[
   505 \[
   534 \begin{equation*}
   534 \begin{equation*}
   535 %\label{eq:psi-C}
   535 %\label{eq:psi-C}
   536 	\psi_{\cC;W}(x) \subset \prod_a \cC(X_a)\spl
   536 	\psi_{\cC;W}(x) \subset \prod_a \cC(X_a)\spl
   537 \end{equation*}
   537 \end{equation*}
   538 where the restrictions to the various pieces of shared boundaries amongst the cells
   538 where the restrictions to the various pieces of shared boundaries amongst the cells
   539 $X_a$ all agree (this is a fibered product of all the labels of $n$-cells over the labels of $n-1$-cells). When $k=n$, the `subset' and `product' in the above formula should be interpreted in the appropriate enriching category.
   539 $X_a$ all agree (this is a fibered product of all the labels of $k$-cells over the labels of $k-1$-cells). When $k=n$, the `subset' and `product' in the above formula should be interpreted in the appropriate enriching category.
   540 If $x$ is a refinement of $y$, the map $\psi_{\cC;W}(x) \to \psi_{\cC;W}(y)$ is given by the composition maps of $\cC$.
   540 If $x$ is a refinement of $y$, the map $\psi_{\cC;W}(x) \to \psi_{\cC;W}(y)$ is given by the composition maps of $\cC$.
   541 \end{defn}
   541 \end{defn}
   542 
   542 
   543 We will use the term `field on $W$' to refer to a point of this functor,
   543 We will use the term `field on $W$' to refer to a point of this functor,
   544 that is, a permissible decomposition $x$ of $W$ together with an element of $\psi_{\cC;W}(x)$.
   544 that is, a permissible decomposition $x$ of $W$ together with an element of $\psi_{\cC;W}(x)$.
   545 
   545 
   546 
   546 
   547 \subsubsection{Colimits}
   547 \subsubsection{Colimits}
   548 Our definition of an $n$-category is essentially a collection of functors defined on $k$-balls (and homeomorphisms) for $k \leq n$ satisfying certain axioms. It is natural to consider extending such functors to the larger categories of all $k$-manifolds (again, with homeomorphisms). In fact, the axioms stated above explictly require such an extension to $k$-spheres for $k<n$.
   548 Our definition of an $n$-category is essentially a collection of functors defined on $k$-balls (and homeomorphisms) for $k \leq n$ satisfying certain axioms. It is natural to consider extending such functors to the larger categories of all $k$-manifolds (again, with homeomorphisms). In fact, the axioms stated above explicitly require such an extension to $k$-spheres for $k<n$.
   549 
   549 
   550 The natural construction achieving this is the colimit.
   550 The natural construction achieving this is the colimit. For an $n$-category $\cC$, we denote the extension to all manifolds by $\cl{\cC}$. On a $k$-manifold $W$, with $k \leq n$, this is defined to be the colimit of the function $\psi_{\cC;W}$. Note that Axioms \ref{axiom:composition} and \ref{axiom:associativity} imply that $\cl{\cC}(X)  \iso \cC(X)$ when $X$ is a $k$-ball with $k<n$. Recall that given boundary conditions $c \in \cl{\cC}(\bdy X)$, for $X$ an $n$-ball, the set $\cC(X;c)$
   551 \nn{continue}
   551 \nn{continue}
   552 
   552 
   553 \nn{Mention that the axioms for $n$-categories can be stated in terms of decompositions of balls?}
   553 \nn{Mention that the axioms for $n$-categories can be stated in terms of decompositions of balls?}
   554 
   554 
   555 We can now give a straightforward but rather abstract definition of the blob complex of an $n$-manifold $W$
   555 We can now give a straightforward but rather abstract definition of the blob complex of an $n$-manifold $W$