42 \item[10] (S) read what's already here |
42 \item[10] (S) read what's already here |
43 \item[A] may need to weaken statement to get boundaries working (K) finish |
43 \item[A] may need to weaken statement to get boundaries working (K) finish |
44 \item[B] (S) look at this, decide what to keep |
44 \item[B] (S) look at this, decide what to keep |
45 |
45 |
46 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}. |
46 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}. |
47 \item Make clear exactly what counts as a "blob diagram", and search for |
47 \nn{KW: Do we need to do this? We don't really classify field theories. |
48 "blob diagram" |
48 I suppose our work could be interpreted as a alternative proof of cobordism hypothesis, but we |
|
49 don't emphasize that at the moment. |
|
50 On the other hand, I'm happy to do Chris a favor by citing this stuff.} |
|
51 |
|
52 \item Make clear exactly what counts as a ``blob diagram", and search for |
|
53 ``blob diagram" |
49 |
54 |
50 \item Say something about stabilizing an $n$-category (centre), taking the top $k$ levels of a category, and the stabilization hypothesis? |
55 \item Say something about stabilizing an $n$-category (centre), taking the top $k$ levels of a category, and the stabilization hypothesis? |
51 |
56 |
52 \item say something about starting with semisimple n-cat (trivial?? not trivial?) |
57 \item say something about starting with semisimple n-cat (trivial?? not trivial?) |
53 |
58 |