blob1.tex
changeset 42 9744833c9b90
parent 41 ef01b18b42ea
child 44 1b9b2aab1f35
equal deleted inserted replaced
41:ef01b18b42ea 42:9744833c9b90
   773 
   773 
   774 \medskip
   774 \medskip
   775 
   775 
   776 Let $f: P \times X \to X$ be a family of diffeomorphisms and $S \sub X$.
   776 Let $f: P \times X \to X$ be a family of diffeomorphisms and $S \sub X$.
   777 We say that {\it $f$ is supported on $S$} if $f(p, x) = f(q, x)$ for all
   777 We say that {\it $f$ is supported on $S$} if $f(p, x) = f(q, x)$ for all
   778 $x \notin S$ and $p, q \in P$. Equivalently \todo{really?}, $f$ is supported on $S$ if there is a family of diffeomorphisms $f' : P \times S \to S$ and a `background'
   778 $x \notin S$ and $p, q \in P$. Equivalently, $f$ is supported on $S$ if there is a family of diffeomorphisms $f' : P \times S \to S$ and a `background'
   779 diffeomorphism $f_0 : X \to X$ so that
   779 diffeomorphism $f_0 : X \to X$ so that
   780 \begin{align}
   780 \begin{align}
   781 \restrict{f}{P \times S}(p,s) & = f_0(f'(p,s)) \\
   781 	f(p,s) & = f_0(f'(p,s)) \;\;\;\; \mbox{for}\; (p, s) \in P\times S \\
   782 \intertext{and}
   782 \intertext{and}
   783 \restrict{f}{P \times (X \setmin S)}(p,x) & = f_0(x).
   783 	f(p,x) & = f_0(x) \;\;\;\; \mbox{for}\; (p, x) \in {P \times (X \setmin S)}.
   784 \end{align}
   784 \end{align}
   785 Note that if $f$ is supported on $S$ then it is also supported on any $R \sup S$.
   785 Note that if $f$ is supported on $S$ then it is also supported on any $R \sup S$.
   786 
   786 
   787 Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$.
   787 Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$.
   788 A $k$-parameter family of diffeomorphisms $f: P \times X \to X$ is
   788 A $k$-parameter family of diffeomorphisms $f: P \times X \to X$ is
   795 \eq{
   795 \eq{
   796     f_i :  P_i \times X \to X
   796     f_i :  P_i \times X \to X
   797 }
   797 }
   798 such that
   798 such that
   799 \begin{itemize}
   799 \begin{itemize}
   800 \item each $f_i(p, \cdot): X \to X$\scott{This should just read ``each $f_i$ is supported''} is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$;
   800 \item each $f_i$ is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$;
   801 \item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint;
   801 \item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint;
   802 \item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s,
   802 \item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s,
   803 where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and
   803 where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and
   804 \item $f(p, \cdot) = f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot) \circ g$
   804 \item $f(p, \cdot) = g \circ f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot)$
   805 for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g \in \Diff(X)$.\scott{hmm, can we do $g$ last, instead?}
   805 for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g \in \Diff(X)$.
   806 \end{itemize}
   806 \end{itemize}
   807 A chain $x \in C_k(\Diff(X))$ is (by definition) adapted to $\cU$ if it is the sum
   807 A chain $x \in C_k(\Diff(X))$ is (by definition) adapted to $\cU$ if it is the sum
   808 of singular cells, each of which is adapted to $\cU$.
   808 of singular cells, each of which is adapted to $\cU$.
   809 
   809 
   810 \begin{lemma}  \label{extension_lemma}
   810 \begin{lemma}  \label{extension_lemma}
   836 We define $p\otimes b$ to be in $G_*$ if there exist $\epsilon > 0$ such that
   836 We define $p\otimes b$ to be in $G_*$ if there exist $\epsilon > 0$ such that
   837 $\supp(p) \cup N_\epsilon(b)$ is a union of balls, where $N_\epsilon(b)$ denotes the epsilon
   837 $\supp(p) \cup N_\epsilon(b)$ is a union of balls, where $N_\epsilon(b)$ denotes the epsilon
   838 neighborhood of the support of $b$.
   838 neighborhood of the support of $b$.
   839 \nn{maybe also require that $N_\delta(b)$ is a union of balls for all $\delta<\epsilon$.}
   839 \nn{maybe also require that $N_\delta(b)$ is a union of balls for all $\delta<\epsilon$.}
   840 
   840 
   841 \nn{need to worry about case where the intrinsic support of $p$ is not a union of balls}
   841 \nn{need to worry about case where the intrinsic support of $p$ is not a union of balls.
       
   842 probably we can just stipulate that it is (i.e. only consider families of diffeos with this property).
       
   843 maybe we should build into the definition of ``adapted" that support takes up all of $U_i$.}
   842 
   844 
   843 \nn{need to eventually show independence of choice of metric.  maybe there's a better way than
   845 \nn{need to eventually show independence of choice of metric.  maybe there's a better way than
   844 choosing a metric.  perhaps just choose a nbd of each ball, but I think I see problems
   846 choosing a metric.  perhaps just choose a nbd of each ball, but I think I see problems
   845 with that as well.
   847 with that as well.
   846 the bottom line is that we need a scheme for choosing unions of balls
   848 the bottom line is that we need a scheme for choosing unions of balls
   852 by the action of $\Diff(X)$ on $\bc_*(X)$
   854 by the action of $\Diff(X)$ on $\bc_*(X)$
   853 because $G_0 \sub CD_0\otimes \bc_0$.
   855 because $G_0 \sub CD_0\otimes \bc_0$.
   854 Assume we have defined the evaluation map up to $G_{k-1}$ and
   856 Assume we have defined the evaluation map up to $G_{k-1}$ and
   855 let $p\otimes b$ be a generator of $G_k$.
   857 let $p\otimes b$ be a generator of $G_k$.
   856 Let $C \sub X$ be a union of balls (as described above) containing $\supp(p)\cup\supp(b)$.
   858 Let $C \sub X$ be a union of balls (as described above) containing $\supp(p)\cup\supp(b)$.
   857 There is a factorization $p = p' \circ g$, where $g\in \Diff(X)$ and $p'$ is a family of diffeomorphisms which is the identity outside of $C$.
   859 There is a factorization $p = g \circ p'$, where $g\in \Diff(X)$ and $p'$ is a family of diffeomorphisms which is the identity outside of $C$.
   858 \scott{Shouldn't this be $p = g\circ p'$?}
       
   859 Let $b = b'\bullet b''$, where $b' \in \bc_*(C)$ and $b'' \in \bc_0(X\setmin C)$.
   860 Let $b = b'\bullet b''$, where $b' \in \bc_*(C)$ and $b'' \in \bc_0(X\setmin C)$.
   860 We may assume inductively \scott{why? I don't get this.} that $e_X(\bd(p\otimes b))$ has the form $x\bullet g(b'')$, where
   861 We may assume inductively 
   861 $x \in \bc_*(g(C))$.
   862 (cf the end of this paragraph)
       
   863 that $e_X(\bd(p\otimes b))$ has a similar factorization $x\bullet g(b'')$, where
       
   864 $x \in \bc_*(g(C))$ and $\bd x = 0$.
   862 Since $\bc_*(g(C))$ is contractible, there exists $y \in \bc_*(g(C))$ such that $\bd y = x$.
   865 Since $\bc_*(g(C))$ is contractible, there exists $y \in \bc_*(g(C))$ such that $\bd y = x$.
   863 \nn{need to say more if degree of $x$ is 0}
       
   864 Define $e_X(p\otimes b) = y\bullet g(b'')$.
   866 Define $e_X(p\otimes b) = y\bullet g(b'')$.
   865 
   867 
   866 We now show that $e_X$ on $G_*$ is, up to homotopy, independent of the various choices made.
   868 We now show that $e_X$ on $G_*$ is, up to homotopy, independent of the various choices made.
   867 If we make a different series of choice of the chain $y$ in the previous paragraph,
   869 If we make a different series of choice of the chain $y$ in the previous paragraph,
   868 we can inductively construct a homotopy between the two sets of choices,
   870 we can inductively construct a homotopy between the two sets of choices,
   871 
   873 
   872 Given a different set of choices $\{C'\}$ of the unions of balls $\{C\}$,
   874 Given a different set of choices $\{C'\}$ of the unions of balls $\{C\}$,
   873 we can find a third set of choices $\{C''\}$ such that $C, C' \sub C''$.
   875 we can find a third set of choices $\{C''\}$ such that $C, C' \sub C''$.
   874 The argument now proceeds as in the previous paragraph.
   876 The argument now proceeds as in the previous paragraph.
   875 \nn{should maybe say more here; also need to back up claim about third set of choices}
   877 \nn{should maybe say more here; also need to back up claim about third set of choices}
       
   878 \nn{this definitely needs reworking}
   876 
   879 
   877 Next we show that given $x \in CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ with $\bd x \in G_*$, there exists
   880 Next we show that given $x \in CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ with $\bd x \in G_*$, there exists
   878 a homotopy (rel $\bd x$) to $x' \in G_*$, and further that $x'$ and
   881 a homotopy (rel $\bd x$) to $x' \in G_*$, and further that $x'$ and
   879 this homotopy are unique up to iterated homotopy.
   882 this homotopy are unique up to iterated homotopy.
   880 
   883 
   881 Given $k>0$ and a blob diagram $b$, we say that a cover $\cU$ of $X$ is $k$-compatible with
   884 Given $k>0$ and a blob diagram $b$, we say that a cover $\cU$ of $X$ is $k$-compatible with
   882 $b$ if, for any $\{U_1, \ldots, U_k\} \sub \cU$, the union
   885 $b$ if, for any $\{U_1, \ldots, U_k\} \sub \cU$, the union
   883 $U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_k$ is a union of balls which satisfies the condition used to define $G_*$ above.
   886 $U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_k$ is a union of balls which satisfies the condition used to define $G_*$ above.
   884 Note that if a family of diffeomorphisms $p$ is adapted to
   887 It follows from Lemma \ref{extension_lemma}
   885 $\cU$ and $b$ is a blob diagram occurring in $x$ \scott{huh, what's $x$ here?}, then $p\otimes b \in G_*$.
   888 that if $\cU$ is $k$-compatible with $b$ and
       
   889 $p$ is a $k$-parameter family of diffeomorphisms which is adapted to $\cU$, then
       
   890 $p\otimes b \in G_*$.
   886 \nn{maybe emphasize this more; it's one of the main ideas in the proof}
   891 \nn{maybe emphasize this more; it's one of the main ideas in the proof}
   887 
   892 
   888 Let $k$ be the degree of $x$ and choose a cover $\cU$ of $X$ such that $\cU$ is
   893 Let $k$ be the degree of $x$ and choose a cover $\cU$ of $X$ such that $\cU$ is
   889 $k$-compatible with each of the (finitely many) blob diagrams occurring in $x$.
   894 $k$-compatible with each of the (finitely many) blob diagrams occurring in $x$.
   890 We will use Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} with respect to the cover $\cU$ to
   895 We will use Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} with respect to the cover $\cU$ to