blob1.tex
changeset 59 ac5c74fa38d7
parent 58 267edc250b5d
child 60 46b5c4f3e83c
equal deleted inserted replaced
58:267edc250b5d 59:ac5c74fa38d7
   191 
   191 
   192 \begin{property}[Disjoint union]
   192 \begin{property}[Disjoint union]
   193 \label{property:disjoint-union}
   193 \label{property:disjoint-union}
   194 The blob complex of a disjoint union is naturally the tensor product of the blob complexes.
   194 The blob complex of a disjoint union is naturally the tensor product of the blob complexes.
   195 \begin{equation*}
   195 \begin{equation*}
   196 \bc_*(X_1 \sqcup X_2) \iso \bc_*(X_1) \tensor \bc_*(X_2)
   196 \bc_*(X_1 \du X_2) \iso \bc_*(X_1) \tensor \bc_*(X_2)
   197 \end{equation*}
   197 \end{equation*}
   198 \end{property}
   198 \end{property}
   199 
   199 
   200 \begin{property}[A map for gluing]
   200 \begin{property}[A map for gluing]
   201 \label{property:gluing-map}%
   201 \label{property:gluing-map}%
   284 \label{sec:definitions}
   284 \label{sec:definitions}
   285 
   285 
   286 \subsection{Systems of fields}
   286 \subsection{Systems of fields}
   287 \label{sec:fields}
   287 \label{sec:fields}
   288 
   288 
       
   289 Let $\cM_k$ denote the category (groupoid, in fact) with objects 
       
   290 oriented PL manifolds of dimension
       
   291 $k$ and morphisms homeomorphisms.
       
   292 (We could equally well work with a different category of manifolds ---
       
   293 unoriented, topological, smooth, spin, etc. --- but for definiteness we
       
   294 will stick with oriented PL.)
       
   295 
   289 Fix a top dimension $n$.
   296 Fix a top dimension $n$.
   290 
   297 
   291 A {\it system of fields}
   298 A {\it system of fields}
   292 \nn{maybe should look for better name; but this is the name I use elsewhere}
   299 is a collection of functors $\cC_k$, for $k \le n$, from $\cM_k$ to the
   293 is a collection of functors $\cC$ from manifolds of dimension $n$ or less
   300 category of sets,
   294 to sets.
   301 together with some additional data and satisfying some additional conditions, all specified below.
   295 These functors must satisfy various properties (see \cite{kw:tqft} for details).
   302 
   296 For example:
   303 \nn{refer somewhere to my TQFT notes \cite{kw:tqft}, and possibly also to paper with Chris}
   297 there is a canonical identification $\cC(X \du Y) = \cC(X) \times \cC(Y)$;
   304 
   298 there is a restriction map $\cC(X) \to \cC(\bd X)$;
   305 Before finishing the definition of fields, we give two motivating examples
   299 gluing manifolds corresponds to fibered products of fields;
   306 (actually, families of examples) of systems of fields.
   300 given a field $c \in \cC(Y)$ there is a ``product field"
   307 
   301 $c\times I \in \cC(Y\times I)$; ...
   308 The first examples: Fix a target space $B$, and let $\cC(X)$ be the set of continuous maps
   302 \nn{should eventually include full details of definition of fields.}
   309 from X to $B$.
       
   310 
       
   311 The second examples: Fix an $n$-category $C$, and let $\cC(X)$ be 
       
   312 the set of sub-cell-complexes of $X$ with codimension-$j$ cells labeled by
       
   313 $j$-morphisms of $C$.
       
   314 One can think of such sub-cell-complexes as dual to pasting diagrams for $C$.
       
   315 This is described in more detail below.
       
   316 
       
   317 Now for the rest of the definition of system of fields.
       
   318 \begin{enumerate}
       
   319 \item There are boundary restriction maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC_{k-1}(\bd X)$, 
       
   320 and these maps are a natural
       
   321 transformation between the functors $\cC_k$ and $\cC_{k-1}\circ\bd$.
       
   322 \item There are orientation reversal maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC_k(-X)$, and these maps
       
   323 again comprise a natural transformation of functors.
       
   324 \item $\cC_k$ is compatible with the symmetric monoidal
       
   325 structures on $\cM_k$ and sets: $\cC_k(X \du W) \cong \cC_k(X)\times \cC_k(W)$,
       
   326 compatibly with homeomorphisms, restriction to boundary, and orientation reversal.
       
   327 \item Gluing without corners.
       
   328 Let $\bd X = Y \du -Y \du W$, where $Y$ and $W$ are closed $k{-}1$-manifolds.
       
   329 Let $X\sgl$ denote $X$ glued to itself along $\pm Y$.
       
   330 Using the boundary restriction, disjoint union, and (in one case) orientation reversal
       
   331 maps, we get two maps $\cC_k(X) \to \cC(Y)$, corresponding to the two
       
   332 copies of $Y$ in $\bd X$.
       
   333 Let $\Eq_Y(\cC_k(X))$ denote the equalizer of these two maps.
       
   334 Then (here's the axiom/definition part) there is an injective ``gluing" map
       
   335 \[
       
   336 	\Eq_Y(\cC_k(X)) \hookrightarrow \cC_k(X\sgl) ,
       
   337 \]
       
   338 and this gluing map is compatible with all of the above structure (actions
       
   339 of homeomorphisms, boundary restrictions, orientation reversal, disjoint union).
       
   340 Furthermore, up to homeomorphisms of $X\sgl$ isotopic to the identity,
       
   341 the gluing map is surjective.
       
   342 From the point of view of $X\sgl$ and the image $Y \subset X\sgl$ of the 
       
   343 gluing surface, we say that fields in the image of the gluing map
       
   344 are transverse to $Y$ or cuttable along $Y$.
       
   345 \item Gluing with corners. \nn{...}
       
   346 \item ``product with $I$" maps $\cC(Y)\to \cC(Y\times I)$; 
       
   347 fiber-preserving homeos of $Y\times I$ act trivially on image
       
   348 \nn{...}
       
   349 \end{enumerate}
       
   350 
       
   351 
       
   352 \bigskip
       
   353 \hrule
       
   354 \bigskip
   303 
   355 
   304 \input{text/fields.tex}
   356 \input{text/fields.tex}
   305 
   357 
   306 \nn{note: probably will suppress from notation the distinction
   358 \nn{note: probably will suppress from notation the distinction
   307 between fields and their (orientation-reversal) duals}
   359 between fields and their (orientation-reversal) duals}