blob: comparison text/comm

equal deleted inserted replaced

-:a3311a926113
+:c5a43be00ed4
+%!TEX root = ../blob1.tex
+\section{Commutative algebras as $n$-categories}
+\nn{this should probably not be a section by itself.  i'm just trying to write down the outline
+while it's still fresh in my mind.}
+If $C$ is a commutative algebra it
+can (and will) also be thought of as an $n$-category whose $j$-morphisms are trivial for
+$j<n$ and whose $n$-morphisms are $C$.
+The goal of this \nn{subsection?} is to compute
+$\bc_*(M^n, C)$ for various commutative algebras $C$.
+Let $k[t]$ denote the ring of polynomials in $t$ with coefficients in $k$.
+Let $\Sigma^i(M)$ denote the $i$-th symmetric power of $M$, the configuration space of $i$
+unlabeled points in $M$.
+Note that $\Sigma^0(M)$ is a point.
+Let $\Sigma^\infty(M) = \coprod_{i=0}^\infty \Sigma^i(M)$.
+Let $C_*(X, k)$ denote the singular chain complex of the space $X$ with coefficients in $k$.
+\begin{prop} \label{sympowerprop}
+$\bc_*(M, k[t])$ is homotopy equivalent to $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(M), k)$.
+\end{prop}
+\begin{proof}
+To define the chain maps between the two complexes we will use the following lemma:
+\begin{lemma}
+Let $A_*$ and $B_*$ be chain complexes, and assume $A_*$ is equipped with
+a basis (e.g.\ blob diagrams or singular simplices).
+For each basis element $c \in A_*$ assume given a contractible subcomplex $R(c)_* \sub B_*$
+such that $R(c')_* \sub R(c)_*$ whenever $c'$ is a basis element which is part of $\bd c$.
+Then the complex of chain maps (and (iterated) homotopies) $f:A_*\to B_*$ such that
+$f(c) \in R(c)_*$ for all $c$ is contractible (and in particular non-empty).
+\end{lemma}
+\begin{proof}
+\nn{easy, but should probably write the details eventually}
+\end{proof}
+Our first task: For each blob diagram $b$ define a subcomplex $R(b)_* \sub C_*(\Sigma^\infty(M))$
+satisfying the conditions of the above lemma.
+If $b$ is a 0-blob diagram, then it is just a $k[t]$ field on $M$, which is a
+finite unordered collection of points of $M$ with multiplicities, which is
+a point in $\Sigma^\infty(M)$.
+Define $R(b)_*$ to be the singular chain complex of this point.
+If $(B, u, r)$ is an $i$-blob diagram, let $D\sub M$ be its support (the union of the blobs).
+The path components of $\Sigma^\infty(D)$ are contractible, and these components are indexed
+by the numbers of points in each component of $D$.
+We may assume that the blob labels $u$ have homogeneous $t$ degree in $k[t]$, and so
+$u$ picks out a component $X \sub \Sigma^\infty(D)$.
+The field $r$ on $M\setminus D$ can be thought of as a point in $\Sigma^\infty(M\setminus D)$,
+and using this point we can embed $X$ in $\Sigma^\infty(M)$.
+Define $R(B, u, r)_*$ to be the singular chain complex of $X$, thought of as a
+subspace of $\Sigma^\infty(M)$.
+It is easy to see that $R(\cdot)_*$ satisfies the condition on boundaries from the above lemma.
+Thus we have defined (up to homotopy) a map from
+$\bc_*(M^n, k[t])$ to $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(M))$.
+Next we define, for each simplex $c$ of $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(M))$, a contractible subspace
+$R(c)_* \sub \bc_*(M^n, k[t])$.
+If $c$ is a 0-simplex we use the identification of the fields $\cC(M)$ and
+$\Sigma^\infty(M)$ described above.
+Now let $c$ be an $i$-simplex of $\Sigma^j(M)$.
+Choose a metric on $M$, which induces a metric on $\Sigma^j(M)$.
+We may assume that the diameter of $c$ is small --- that is, $C_*(\Sigma^j(M))$
+is homotopy equivalent to the subcomplex of small simplices.
+How small?  $(2r)/3j$, where $r$ is the radius of injectivity of the metric.
+Let $T\sub M$ be the ``track" of $c$ in $M$.
+\nn{do we need to define this precisely?}
+Choose a neighborhood $D$ of $T$ which is a disjoint union of balls of small diameter.
+\nn{need to say more precisely how small}
+Define $R(c)_*$ to be $\bc_*(D, k[t]) \sub \bc_*(M^n, k[t])$.
+This is contractible by \ref{bcontract}.
+We can arrange that the boundary/inclusion condition is satisfied if we start with
+low-dimensional simplices and work our way up.
+\nn{need to be more precise}
+\nn{still to do: show indep of choice of metric; show compositions are homotopic to the identity
+(for this, might need a lemma that says we can assume that blob diameters are small)}
+\end{proof}
+\begin{prop} \label{ktcdprop}
+The above maps are compatible with the evaluation map actions of $C_*(\Diff(M))$.
+\end{prop}
+\begin{proof}
+The actions agree in degree 0, and both are compatible with gluing.
+(cf. uniqueness statement in \ref{CDprop}.)
+\end{proof}
+\medskip
+In view of \ref{hochthm}, we have proved that $HH_*(k[t]) \cong C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$,
+and that the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is related to the action of rotations
+on $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$.
+\nn{probably should put a more precise statement about cyclic homology and $S^1$ actions in the Hochschild section}
+Let us check this directly.
+According to \nn{Loday, 3.2.2}, $HH_i(k[t]) \cong k[t]$ for $i=0,1$ and is zero for $i\ge 2$.
+\nn{say something about $t$-degree?  is this in [Loday]?}
+We can define a flow on $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ by having the points repel each other.
+The fixed points of this flow are the equally spaced configurations.
+This defines a map from $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ to $S^1/j$ ($S^1$ modulo a $2\pi/j$ rotation).
+The fiber of this map is $\Delta^{j-1}$, the $(j-1)$-simplex,
+and the holonomy of the $\Delta^{j-1}$ bundle
+over $S^1/j$ is induced by the cyclic permutation of its $j$ vertices.
+In particular, $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ is homotopy equivalent to a circle for $j>0$, and
+of course $\Sigma^0(S^1)$ is a point.
+Thus the singular homology $H_i(\Sigma^\infty(S^1))$ has infinitely many generators for $i=0,1$
+and is zero for $i\ge 2$.
+\nn{say something about $t$-degrees also matching up?}
+By xxxx and \ref{ktcdprop},
+the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is the $S^1$-equivariant homology of $\Sigma^\infty(S^1)$.
+Up to homotopy, $S^1$ acts by $j$-fold rotation on $\Sigma^j(S^1) \simeq S^1/j$.
+If $k = \z$, $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ contributes the homology of an infinite lens space: $\z$ in degree
+0, $\z/j \z$ in odd degrees, and 0 in positive even degrees.
+The point $\Sigma^0(S^1)$ contributes the homology of $BS^1$ which is $\z$ in even
+degrees and 0 in odd degrees.
+This agrees with the calculation in \nn{Loday, 3.1.7}.
+\medskip
+Next we consider the case $C = k[t_1, \ldots, t_m]$, commutative polynomials in $m$ variables.
+Let $\Sigma_m^\infty(M)$ be the $m$-colored infinite symmetric power of $M$, that is, configurations
+of points on $M$ which can have any of $m$ distinct colors but are otherwise indistinguishable.
+The components of $\Sigma_m^\infty(M)$ are indexed by $m$-tuples of natural numbers
+corresponding to the number of points of each color of a configuration.
+A proof similar to that of \ref{sympowerprop} shows that
+\begin{prop}
+$\bc_*(M, k[t_1, \ldots, t_m])$ is homotopy equivalent to $C_*(\Sigma_m^\infty(M), k)$.
+\end{prop}
+According to \nn{Loday, 3.2.2},
+\[
+	HH_n(k[t_1, \ldots, t_m]) \cong \Lambda^n(k^m) \otimes k[t_1, \ldots, t_m] .
+\]
+Let us check that this is also the singular homology of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$.
+We will content ourselves with the case $k = \z$.
+One can define a flow on $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ where points of the same color repel each other and points of different colors do not interact.
+This shows that a component $X$ of $\Sigma_m^\infty(S^1)$ is homotopy equivalent
+to the torus $(S^1)^l$, where $l$ is the number of non-zero entries in the $m$-tuple
+corresponding to $X$.
+The homology calculation we desire follows easily from this.
+\nn{say something about cyclic homology in this case?  probably not necessary.}
+\medskip
+Next we consider the case $C = k[t]/t^l$ --- polynomials in $t$ with $t^l = 0$.
+Define $\Delta_l \sub \Sigma^\infty(M)$ to be those configurations of points with $l$ or
+more points coinciding.
+\begin{prop}
+$\bc_*(M, k[t]/t^l)$ is homotopy equivalent to $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(M), \Delta_l, k)$
+(relative singular chains with coefficients in $k$).
+\end{prop}
+\begin{proof}
+\nn{...}
+\end{proof}
+\nn{...}

changeset 100	c5a43be00ed4
child 117	b62214646c4f