text/evmap.tex
changeset 250 c6ea1c9c504e
parent 249 daf58017eec5
child 251 195b767cafdb
equal deleted inserted replaced
249:daf58017eec5 250:c6ea1c9c504e
   485 	U \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1}r'}(R) = \Nbd_{t}(S) \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_k r}(S) ,
   485 	U \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1}r'}(R) = \Nbd_{t}(S) \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_k r}(S) ,
   486 \]
   486 \]
   487 where $t = \phi_{k-1}(2\phi_{k-1}+2)r + \phi_{k-1} r$.
   487 where $t = \phi_{k-1}(2\phi_{k-1}+2)r + \phi_{k-1} r$.
   488 \end{proof}
   488 \end{proof}
   489 
   489 
   490 
       
   491 \medskip
   490 \medskip
   492 
   491 
   493 
   492 Next we assemble the maps $e_{i,m}$, for various $i$ but fixed $m$, into a single map 
   494 \hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip
   493 \[
       
   494 	e_m: CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to \bc_*(X) .
       
   495 \]
       
   496 More precisely, we will specify an $m$-connected subspace of the chain complex
       
   497 of all maps from $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ to $\bc_*(X)$.
       
   498 
       
   499 First we specify an endomorphism $\alpha$ of $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ using acyclic models.
       
   500 Let $p\ot b$ be a generator of $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$, with $n = \deg(p)$.
       
   501 Let $i = k_{bmn}$ and $j = j_i$ be as in the statement of Lemma \ref{Gim_approx}.
       
   502 Let $K_{p,b} \sub CH_*(X, X)$ be the union of the tracks of the homotopies from $g_l(p)$ to 
       
   503 $g_{l+1}(p)$, for all $l \ge j$.
       
   504 This is a contractible set, and so therefore is $K_{p,b}\ot b \sub CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$.
       
   505 Without loss of generality we may assume that $k_{bmn} \ge k_{cm,n-1}$ for all blob diagrams $c$ appearing in $\bd b$.
       
   506 It follows that $K_{p,b}\ot b \sub K_{q,c}\ot c$ for all $q\ot c$ 
       
   507 appearing in the boundary of $p\ot b$.
       
   508 Thus we can apply Lemma \ref{xxxx} \nn{backward acyclic models lemma, from appendix}
       
   509 to get the desired map $\alpha$, well-defined up to a contractible set of choices.
       
   510 
       
   511 
       
   512 
       
   513 
       
   514 
       
   515 
       
   516 
       
   517 \medskip\hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip
   495 
   518 
   496 \nn{outline of what remains to be done:}
   519 \nn{outline of what remains to be done:}
   497 
   520 
   498 \begin{itemize}
   521 \begin{itemize}
   499 \item We need to assemble the maps for the various $G^{i,m}$ into
   522 \item We need to assemble the maps for the various $G^{i,m}$ into
   505 \item Independence of metric, $\ep_i$, $\delta_i$:
   528 \item Independence of metric, $\ep_i$, $\delta_i$:
   506 For a different metric etc. let $\hat{G}^{i,m}$ denote the alternate subcomplexes
   529 For a different metric etc. let $\hat{G}^{i,m}$ denote the alternate subcomplexes
   507 and $\hat{N}_{i,l}$ the alternate neighborhoods.
   530 and $\hat{N}_{i,l}$ the alternate neighborhoods.
   508 Main idea is that for all $i$ there exists sufficiently large $k$ such that
   531 Main idea is that for all $i$ there exists sufficiently large $k$ such that
   509 $\hat{N}_{k,l} \sub N_{i,l}$, and similarly with the roles of $N$ and $\hat{N}$ reversed.
   532 $\hat{N}_{k,l} \sub N_{i,l}$, and similarly with the roles of $N$ and $\hat{N}$ reversed.
       
   533 \item prove gluing compatibility, as in statement of main thm
   510 \item Also need to prove associativity.
   534 \item Also need to prove associativity.
   511 \end{itemize}
   535 \end{itemize}
   512 
   536 
   513 
   537 
   514 \nn{to be continued....}
   538 \nn{to be continued....}