text/appendixes/famodiff.tex
changeset 271 cb40431c8a65
parent 245 7537032ad5a0
child 272 a7a23eeb5d65
equal deleted inserted replaced
270:80c8e5d2f02b 271:cb40431c8a65
     1 %!TEX root = ../../blob1.tex
     1 %!TEX root = ../../blob1.tex
     2 
     2 
     3 \section{Families of Diffeomorphisms}  \label{sec:localising}
     3 \section{Adapting families of maps to open covers}  \label{sec:localising}
     4 
     4 
     5 
     5 
     6 \medskip
     6 Let $X$ and $T$ be topological spaces.
     7 \hrule
     7 Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$ which affords a partition of
     8 \medskip
     8 unity $\{r_\alpha\}$.
     9 \nn{the following was removed from earlier section; it should be reincorporated somehwere
     9 (That is, $r_\alpha : X \to [0,1]$; $r_\alpha(x) = 0$ if $x\notin U_\alpha$;
    10 in this section}
    10 for fixed $x$, $r_\alpha(x) \ne 0$ for only finitely many $\alpha$; and $\sum_\alpha r_\alpha = 1$.)
    11 
    11 
    12 Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$.
    12 Let
    13 A $k$-parameter family of homeomorphisms $f: P \times X \to X$ is
    13 \[
    14 {\it adapted to $\cU$} if there is a factorization
    14 	CM_*(X, T) \deq C_*(\Maps(X\to T)) ,
    15 \eq{
    15 \]
    16     P = P_1 \times \cdots \times P_m
    16 the singular chains on the space of continuous maps from $X$ to $T$.
    17 }
    17 $CM_k(X, T)$ is generated by continuous maps
    18 (for some $m \le k$)
    18 \[
    19 and families of homeomorphisms
    19 	f: P\times X \to T ,
    20 \eq{
    20 \]
    21     f_i :  P_i \times X \to X
    21 where $P$ is some linear polyhedron in $\r^k$.
    22 }
    22 Recall that $f$ is {\it supported} on $S\sub X$ if $f(p, x)$ does not depend on $p$ when
       
    23 $x \notin S$, and that $f$ is {\it adapted} to $\cU$ if 
       
    24 $f$ is supported on the union of at most $k$ of the $U_\alpha$'s.
       
    25 A chain $c \in CM_*(X, T)$ is adapted to $\cU$ if it is a linear combination of 
       
    26 generators which are adapted.
       
    27 
       
    28 \begin{lemma} \label{basic_adaptation_lemma}
       
    29 The $f: P\times X \to T$, as above.
       
    30 The there exists
       
    31 \[
       
    32 	F: I \times P\times X \to T
       
    33 \]
    23 such that
    34 such that
    24 \begin{itemize}
    35 \begin{enumerate}
    25 \item each $f_i$ is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$;
    36 \item $F(0, \cdot, \cdot) = f$ .
    26 \item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint;
    37 \item We can decompose $P = \cup_i D_i$ so that
    27 \item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s,
    38 the restrictions $F(1, \cdot, \cdot) : D_i\times X\to T$ are all adapted to $\cU$.
    28 where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and
    39 \item If $f$ restricted to $Q\sub P$ has support $S\sub X$, then the restriction
    29 \item $f(p, \cdot) = g \circ f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot)$
    40 $F: (I\times Q)\times X\to T$ also has support $S$.
    30 for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g \in \Homeo(X)$.
    41 \item If for all $p\in P$ we have $f(p, \cdot):X\to T$ is a 
    31 \end{itemize}
    42 [submersion, diffeomorphism, PL homeomorphism, bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism]
    32 A chain $x \in CH_k(X)$ is (by definition) adapted to $\cU$ if it is the sum
    43 then the same is true of $F(t, p, \cdot)$ for all $t\in I$ and $p\in P$.
    33 of singular cells, each of which is adapted to $\cU$.
    44 (Of course we must assume that $X$ and $T$ are the appropriate 
    34 \medskip
    45 sort of manifolds for this to make sense.)
    35 \hrule
    46 \end{enumerate}
    36 \medskip
    47 \end{lemma}
    37 \nn{another refugee:}
    48 
    38 
    49 
    39 We will actually prove the following more general result.
    50 
    40 Let $S$ and $T$ be an arbitrary topological spaces.
    51 
    41 %\nn{might need to restrict $S$; the proof uses partition of unity on $S$;
    52 \noop{
    42 %check this; or maybe just restrict the cover}
    53 
    43 Let $CM_*(S, T)$ denote the singular chains on the space of continuous maps
    54 \nn{move this to later:}
    44 from $S$ to $T$.
       
    45 Let $\cU$ be an open cover of $S$ which affords a partition of unity.
       
    46 \nn{for some $S$ and $\cU$ there is no partition of unity?  like if $S$ is not paracompact?
       
    47 in any case, in our applications $S$ will always be a manifold}
       
    48 
    55 
    49 \begin{lemma}  \label{extension_lemma_b}
    56 \begin{lemma}  \label{extension_lemma_b}
    50 Let $x \in CM_k(S, T)$ be a singular chain such that $\bd x$ is adapted to $\cU$.
    57 Let $x \in CM_k(X, T)$ be a singular chain such that $\bd x$ is adapted to $\cU$.
    51 Then $x$ is homotopic (rel boundary) to some $x' \in CM_k(S, T)$ which is adapted to $\cU$.
    58 Then $x$ is homotopic (rel boundary) to some $x' \in CM_k(S, T)$ which is adapted to $\cU$.
    52 Furthermore, one can choose the homotopy so that its support is equal to the support of $x$.
    59 Furthermore, one can choose the homotopy so that its support is equal to the support of $x$.
    53 If $S$ and $T$ are manifolds, the statement remains true if we replace $CM_*(S, T)$ with
    60 If $S$ and $T$ are manifolds, the statement remains true if we replace $CM_*(S, T)$ with
    54 chains of smooth maps or immersions.
    61 chains of smooth maps or immersions.
    55 \end{lemma}
    62 \end{lemma}
    71 \nn{for pedagogical reasons, should do $k=1,2$ cases first; probably do this in
    78 \nn{for pedagogical reasons, should do $k=1,2$ cases first; probably do this in
    72 later draft}
    79 later draft}
    73 
    80 
    74 \nn{not sure what the best way to deal with boundary is; for now just give main argument, worry
    81 \nn{not sure what the best way to deal with boundary is; for now just give main argument, worry
    75 about boundary later}
    82 about boundary later}
       
    83 
       
    84 }
       
    85 
       
    86 
       
    87 \nn{**** resume revising here ****}
       
    88 
    76 
    89 
    77 \begin{proof}
    90 \begin{proof}
    78 
    91 
    79 Recall that we are given
    92 Recall that we are given
    80 an open cover $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ and an
    93 an open cover $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ and an
   250 
   263 
   251 \nn{this completes proof}
   264 \nn{this completes proof}
   252 
   265 
   253 \end{proof}
   266 \end{proof}
   254 
   267 
       
   268 
       
   269 
       
   270 
       
   271 \medskip
       
   272 \hrule
       
   273 \medskip
       
   274 \nn{the following was removed from earlier section; it should be reincorporated somehwere
       
   275 in this section}
       
   276 
       
   277 Let $\cU = \{U_\alpha\}$ be an open cover of $X$.
       
   278 A $k$-parameter family of homeomorphisms $f: P \times X \to X$ is
       
   279 {\it adapted to $\cU$} if there is a factorization
       
   280 \eq{
       
   281     P = P_1 \times \cdots \times P_m
       
   282 }
       
   283 (for some $m \le k$)
       
   284 and families of homeomorphisms
       
   285 \eq{
       
   286     f_i :  P_i \times X \to X
       
   287 }
       
   288 such that
       
   289 \begin{itemize}
       
   290 \item each $f_i$ is supported on some connected $V_i \sub X$;
       
   291 \item the sets $V_i$ are mutually disjoint;
       
   292 \item each $V_i$ is the union of at most $k_i$ of the $U_\alpha$'s,
       
   293 where $k_i = \dim(P_i)$; and
       
   294 \item $f(p, \cdot) = g \circ f_1(p_1, \cdot) \circ \cdots \circ f_m(p_m, \cdot)$
       
   295 for all $p = (p_1, \ldots, p_m)$, for some fixed $g \in \Homeo(X)$.
       
   296 \end{itemize}
       
   297 A chain $x \in CH_k(X)$ is (by definition) adapted to $\cU$ if it is the sum
       
   298 of singular cells, each of which is adapted to $\cU$.
       
   299 \medskip
       
   300 \hrule
       
   301 \medskip
       
   302 
       
   303 
       
   304 
       
   305 
       
   306 
   255 \input{text/appendixes/explicit.tex}
   307 \input{text/appendixes/explicit.tex}
   256 
   308