blob1.tex
changeset 417 d3b05641e7ca
parent 414 214d944956e8
child 418 a96f3d2ef852
equal deleted inserted replaced
416:c06a899bd1f0 417:d3b05641e7ca
    14 \gdef\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
    14 \gdef\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
    15 \makeatother
    15 \makeatother
    16 
    16 
    17 \maketitle
    17 \maketitle
    18 
    18 
    19 [revision $\ge$ 414;  $\ge$ 3 July 2010]
    19 [revision $\ge$ 417;  $\ge$ 4 July 2010]
    20 
    20 
    21 {\color[rgb]{.9,.5,.2} \large \textbf{Draft version, read with caution.}}
    21 {\color[rgb]{.9,.5,.2} \large \textbf{Draft version, read with caution.}}
    22 We're in the midst of revising this, and hope to have a version on the arXiv soon.
    22 We're in the midst of revising this, and hope to have a version on the arXiv soon.
    23 
    23 
    24 \noop{
    24 \noop{
    25 
    25 
    26 \paragraph{To do list}
    26 \paragraph{To do list}
    27 \begin{itemize}
    27 \begin{itemize}
    28 \item[1] (K) tweak intro
       
    29 \item[2] (S) needs explanation that this will be superseded by the n-cat
       
    30 definitions in \S 7.
       
    31 \item[2] (S) incorporate improvements from later
       
    32 \item[2.3] (S) foreshadow generalising; quotient to resolution
       
    33 \item[3] (K) look over blob homology section again
       
    34 \item[4] (S) basic properties, not much to do
       
    35 \item[5] (K) finish the lemmas in the Hochschild section
       
    36 \item[6] (K) proofs need finishing, then (S) needs to confirm details and try
    28 \item[6] (K) proofs need finishing, then (S) needs to confirm details and try
    37 to make more understandable
    29 to make more understandable
    38 \item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting? Say something about $E_n$ algebras?
    30 \item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting?
    39 \item[7.6] is new! (S) read
    31 \item[7.6] is new! (S) read
    40 \item[8] improve the beginning, finish proof for products,
    32 \item[8] improve the beginning, finish proof for products,
    41 check the argument about maps
    33 check the argument about maps
    42 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off
    34 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off
    43 \item[10] (S) read what's already here
       
    44 \item[A] may need to weaken statement to get boundaries working (K) finish
       
    45 \item[B] (S) look at this, decide what to keep
       
    46 
    35 
    47 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}.
    36 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}.
    48 \nn{KW: Do we need to do this?  We don't really classify field theories.
    37 \nn{KW: Do we need to do this?  We don't really classify field theories.
    49 I suppose our work could be interpreted as a alternative proof of cobordism hypothesis, but we 
    38 I suppose our work could be interpreted as a alternative proof of cobordism hypothesis, but we 
    50 don't emphasize that at the moment.  
    39 don't emphasize that at the moment.  
    62 
    51 
    63 \end{itemize}
    52 \end{itemize}
    64 
    53 
    65 }  % end \noop
    54 }  % end \noop
    66 
    55 
       
    56 
       
    57 
    67 \tableofcontents
    58 \tableofcontents
    68 
       
    69 
    59 
    70 \input{text/intro}
    60 \input{text/intro}
    71 
    61 
    72 \input{text/tqftreview}
    62 \input{text/tqftreview}
    73 
    63