blob1.tex
changeset 50 dd9487823529
parent 49 75c9b874dea7
child 51 195a0a91e062
equal deleted inserted replaced
49:75c9b874dea7 50:dd9487823529
  1495 \nn{still to do: show indep of choice of metric; show compositions are homotopic to the identity
  1495 \nn{still to do: show indep of choice of metric; show compositions are homotopic to the identity
  1496 (for this, might need a lemma that says we can assume that blob diameters are small)}
  1496 (for this, might need a lemma that says we can assume that blob diameters are small)}
  1497 \end{proof}
  1497 \end{proof}
  1498 
  1498 
  1499 
  1499 
  1500 \begin{prop}
  1500 \begin{prop} \label{ktcdprop}
  1501 The above maps are compatible with the evaluation map actions of $C_*(\Diff(M))$.
  1501 The above maps are compatible with the evaluation map actions of $C_*(\Diff(M))$.
  1502 \end{prop}
  1502 \end{prop}
  1503 
  1503 
  1504 \begin{proof}
  1504 \begin{proof}
  1505 The actions agree in degree 0, and both are compatible with gluing.
  1505 The actions agree in degree 0, and both are compatible with gluing.
  1512 and that the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is related to the action of rotations
  1512 and that the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is related to the action of rotations
  1513 on $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$.
  1513 on $C_*(\Sigma^\infty(S^1), k)$.
  1514 \nn{probably should put a more precise statement about cyclic homology and $S^1$ actions in the Hochschild section}
  1514 \nn{probably should put a more precise statement about cyclic homology and $S^1$ actions in the Hochschild section}
  1515 Let us check this directly.
  1515 Let us check this directly.
  1516 
  1516 
       
  1517 According to \nn{Loday, 3.2.2}, $HH_i(k[t]) \cong k[t]$ for $i=0,1$ and is zero for $i\ge 2$.
       
  1518 \nn{say something about $t$-degree?  is this in [Loday]?}
       
  1519 
  1517 We can define a flow on $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ by having the points repel each other.
  1520 We can define a flow on $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ by having the points repel each other.
  1518 The fixed points of this flow are the equally spaced configurations.
  1521 The fixed points of this flow are the equally spaced configurations.
  1519 This defines a map from $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ to $S^1/j$ ($S^1$ modulo a $2\pi/j$ rotation.).
  1522 This defines a map from $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ to $S^1/j$ ($S^1$ modulo a $2\pi/j$ rotation).
  1520 The fiber of this map is $\Delta^{j-1}$, the $(j-1)$-simplex, 
  1523 The fiber of this map is $\Delta^{j-1}$, the $(j-1)$-simplex, 
  1521 and the holonomy of the $\Delta^{j-1}$ bundle
  1524 and the holonomy of the $\Delta^{j-1}$ bundle
  1522 over $S^1$ is the cyclic permutation of its $j$ vertices.
  1525 over $S^1/j$ is induced by the cyclic permutation of its $j$ vertices.
       
  1526 
       
  1527 In particular, $\Sigma^j(S^1)$ is homotopy equivalent to a circle for $j>0$, and
       
  1528 of course $\Sigma^0(S^1)$ is a point.
       
  1529 Thus the singular homology $H_i(\Sigma^\infty(S^1))$ has infinitely many generators for $i=0,1$
       
  1530 and is zero for $i\ge 2$.
       
  1531 \nn{say something about $t$-degrees also matching up?}
       
  1532 
       
  1533 By xxxx and \ref{ktcdprop}, 
       
  1534 the cyclic homology of $k[t]$ is the $S^1$-equivariant homology of $\Sigma^\infty(S^1)$.
       
  1535 Up to homotopy, $S^1$ acts by $j$-fold rotation on $\Sigma^j(S^1) \simeq S^1/j$.
       
  1536 If $k = \z$, we then have 
  1523 
  1537 
  1524 
  1538 
  1525 
  1539 
  1526 
  1540 
  1527 
  1541