blob1.tex
changeset 19 ea489bbccfbf
parent 18 aac9fd8d6bc6
child 20 60a068a5be10
equal deleted inserted replaced
18:aac9fd8d6bc6 19:ea489bbccfbf
   609 
   609 
   610 \nn{need to rewrite for self-gluing instead of gluing two pieces together}
   610 \nn{need to rewrite for self-gluing instead of gluing two pieces together}
   611 
   611 
   612 \nn{Should say something stronger about uniqueness.
   612 \nn{Should say something stronger about uniqueness.
   613 Something like: there is
   613 Something like: there is
   614 a contractible subcomplex of the complex of chain maps 
   614 a contractible subcomplex of the complex of chain maps
   615 $CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to \bc_*(X)$ (0-cells are the maps, 1-cells are homotopies, etc.),
   615 $CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to \bc_*(X)$ (0-cells are the maps, 1-cells are homotopies, etc.),
   616 and all choices in the construction lie in the 0-cells of this
   616 and all choices in the construction lie in the 0-cells of this
   617 contractible subcomplex.
   617 contractible subcomplex.
   618 Or maybe better to say any two choices are homotopic, and 
   618 Or maybe better to say any two choices are homotopic, and
   619 any two homotopies and second order homotopic, and so on.}
   619 any two homotopies and second order homotopic, and so on.}
   620 
   620 
   621 \nn{Also need to say something about associativity.
   621 \nn{Also need to say something about associativity.
   622 Put it in the above prop or make it a separate prop?
   622 Put it in the above prop or make it a separate prop?
   623 I lean toward the latter.}
   623 I lean toward the latter.}
   667 \medskip
   667 \medskip
   668 
   668 
   669 The strategy for the proof of Proposition \ref{CDprop} is as follows.
   669 The strategy for the proof of Proposition \ref{CDprop} is as follows.
   670 We will identify a subcomplex
   670 We will identify a subcomplex
   671 \[
   671 \[
   672 	G_* \sub CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)
   672     G_* \sub CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)
   673 \]
   673 \]
   674 on which the evaluation map is uniquely determined (up to homotopy) by the conditions
   674 on which the evaluation map is uniquely determined (up to homotopy) by the conditions
   675 in \ref{CDprop}.
   675 in \ref{CDprop}.
   676 We then show that the inclusion of $G_*$ into the full complex
   676 We then show that the inclusion of $G_*$ into the full complex
   677 is an equivalence in the appropriate sense.
   677 is an equivalence in the appropriate sense.
   678 \nn{need to be more specific here}
   678 \nn{need to be more specific here}
   679 
   679 
   680 Let $p$ be a singular cell in $CD_*(X)$ and $b$ be a blob diagram in $\bc_*(X)$.
   680 Let $p$ be a singular cell in $CD_*(X)$ and $b$ be a blob diagram in $\bc_*(X)$.
   681 Roughly speaking, $p\otimes b$ is in $G_*$ if each component $V$ of the support of $p$ 
   681 Roughly speaking, $p\otimes b$ is in $G_*$ if each component $V$ of the support of $p$
   682 intersects at most one blob $B$ of $b$.
   682 intersects at most one blob $B$ of $b$.
   683 Since $V \cup B$ might not itself be a ball, we need a more careful and complicated definition.
   683 Since $V \cup B$ might not itself be a ball, we need a more careful and complicated definition.
   684 Choose a metric for $X$.
   684 Choose a metric for $X$.
   685 We define $p\otimes b$ to be in $G_*$ if there exist $\epsilon > 0$ such that 
   685 We define $p\otimes b$ to be in $G_*$ if there exist $\epsilon > 0$ such that
   686 $N_\epsilon(b) \cup \supp(p)$ is a union of balls, where $N_\epsilon(b)$ denotes the epsilon
   686 $\supp(p) \cup N_\epsilon(b)$ is a union of balls, where $N_\epsilon(b)$ denotes the epsilon
   687 neighborhood of the support of $b$.
   687 neighborhood of the support of $b$.
   688 \nn{maybe also require that $N_\delta(b)$ is a union of balls for all $\delta<\epsilon$.}
   688 \nn{maybe also require that $N_\delta(b)$ is a union of balls for all $\delta<\epsilon$.}
   689 
   689 
   690 \nn{need to worry about case where the intrinsic support of $p$ is not a union of balls}
   690 \nn{need to worry about case where the intrinsic support of $p$ is not a union of balls}
   691 
   691 
   702 because $G_0 \sub CD_0\otimes \bc_0$.
   702 because $G_0 \sub CD_0\otimes \bc_0$.
   703 Assume we have defined the evaluation map up to $G_{k-1}$ and
   703 Assume we have defined the evaluation map up to $G_{k-1}$ and
   704 let $p\otimes b$ be a generator of $G_k$.
   704 let $p\otimes b$ be a generator of $G_k$.
   705 Let $C \sub X$ be a union of balls (as described above) containing $\supp(p)\cup\supp(b)$.
   705 Let $C \sub X$ be a union of balls (as described above) containing $\supp(p)\cup\supp(b)$.
   706 There is a factorization $p = p' \circ g$, where $g\in \Diff(X)$ and $p'$ is a family of diffeomorphisms which is the identity outside of $C$.
   706 There is a factorization $p = p' \circ g$, where $g\in \Diff(X)$ and $p'$ is a family of diffeomorphisms which is the identity outside of $C$.
       
   707 \scott{Shouldn't this be $p = g\circ p'$?}
   707 Let $b = b'\bullet b''$, where $b' \in \bc_*(C)$ and $b'' \in \bc_0(X\setmin C)$.
   708 Let $b = b'\bullet b''$, where $b' \in \bc_*(C)$ and $b'' \in \bc_0(X\setmin C)$.
   708 We may assume inductively that $e_X(\bd(p\otimes b))$ has the form $x\bullet g(b'')$, where
   709 We may assume inductively \scott{why? I don't get this.} that $e_X(\bd(p\otimes b))$ has the form $x\bullet g(b'')$, where
   709 $x \in \bc_*(g(C))$.
   710 $x \in \bc_*(g(C))$.
   710 Since $\bc_*(g(C))$ is contractible, there exists $y \in \bc_*(g(C))$ such that $\bd y = x$.
   711 Since $\bc_*(g(C))$ is contractible, there exists $y \in \bc_*(g(C))$ such that $\bd y = x$.
   711 \nn{need to say more if degree of $x$ is 0}
   712 \nn{need to say more if degree of $x$ is 0}
   712 Define $e_X(p\otimes b) = y\bullet g(b'')$.
   713 Define $e_X(p\otimes b) = y\bullet g(b'')$.
   713 
   714 
   714 We now show that $e_X$ on $G_*$ is, up to homotopy, independent of the various choices made.
   715 We now show that $e_X$ on $G_*$ is, up to homotopy, independent of the various choices made.
   715 If we make a different series of choice of the chain $y$ in the previous paragraph, 
   716 If we make a different series of choice of the chain $y$ in the previous paragraph,
   716 we can inductively construct a homotopy between the two sets of choices,
   717 we can inductively construct a homotopy between the two sets of choices,
   717 again relying on the contractibility of $\bc_*(g(G))$.
   718 again relying on the contractibility of $\bc_*(g(G))$.
   718 A similar argument shows that this homotopy is unique up to second order homotopy, and so on.
   719 A similar argument shows that this homotopy is unique up to second order homotopy, and so on.
   719 
   720 
   720 Given a different set of choices $\{C'\}$ of the unions of balls $\{C\}$,
   721 Given a different set of choices $\{C'\}$ of the unions of balls $\{C\}$,
   724 
   725 
   725 Next we show that given $x \in CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ with $\bd x \in G_*$, there exists
   726 Next we show that given $x \in CD_*(X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ with $\bd x \in G_*$, there exists
   726 a homotopy (rel $\bd x$) to $x' \in G_*$, and further that $x'$ and
   727 a homotopy (rel $\bd x$) to $x' \in G_*$, and further that $x'$ and
   727 this homotopy are unique up to iterated homotopy.
   728 this homotopy are unique up to iterated homotopy.
   728 
   729 
   729 Given $k>0$ and a blob diagram $b$, we say that a cover of $X$ $\cU$ is $k$-compatible with
   730 Given $k>0$ and a blob diagram $b$, we say that a cover $\cU$ of $X$ is $k$-compatible with
   730 $b$ if, for any $\{U_1, \ldots, U_k\} \sub \cU$, the union 
   731 $b$ if, for any $\{U_1, \ldots, U_k\} \sub \cU$, the union
   731 $U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_k$ is a union of balls which satisfies the condition used to define $G_*$ above.
   732 $U_1\cup\cdots\cup U_k$ is a union of balls which satisfies the condition used to define $G_*$ above.
   732 Note that if a family of diffeomorphisms $p$ is adapted to 
   733 Note that if a family of diffeomorphisms $p$ is adapted to
   733 $\cU$ and $b$ is a blob diagram occurring in $x$, then $p\otimes b \in G_*$.
   734 $\cU$ and $b$ is a blob diagram occurring in $x$ \scott{huh, what's $x$ here?}, then $p\otimes b \in G_*$.
   734 \nn{maybe emphasize this more; it's one of the main ideas in the proof}
   735 \nn{maybe emphasize this more; it's one of the main ideas in the proof}
   735 
   736 
   736 Let $k$ be the degree of $x$ and choose a cover $\cU$ of $X$ such that $\cU$ is
   737 Let $k$ be the degree of $x$ and choose a cover $\cU$ of $X$ such that $\cU$ is
   737 $k$-compatible with each of the (finitely many) blob diagrams occurring in $x$.
   738 $k$-compatible with each of the (finitely many) blob diagrams occurring in $x$.
   738 We will use Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} with respect to the cover $\cU$ to 
   739 We will use Lemma \ref{extension_lemma} with respect to the cover $\cU$ to
   739 construct the homotopy to $G_*$.
   740 construct the homotopy to $G_*$.
   740 First we will construct a homotopy $h \in G_*$ from $\bd x$ to a cycle $z$ such that
   741 First we will construct a homotopy $h \in G_*$ from $\bd x$ to a cycle $z$ such that
   741 each family of diffeomorphisms $p$ occurring in $z$ is adapted to $\cU$.
   742 each family of diffeomorphisms $p$ occurring in $z$ is adapted to $\cU$.
   742 Then we will construct a homotopy (rel boundary) $r$ from $x + h$ to $y$ such that
   743 Then we will construct a homotopy (rel boundary) $r$ from $x + h$ to $y$ such that
   743 each family of diffeomorphisms $p$ occurring in $y$ is adapted to $\cU$.
   744 each family of diffeomorphisms $p$ occurring in $y$ is adapted to $\cU$.
   744 This implies that $y \in G_*$.
   745 This implies that $y \in G_*$.
   745 $r$ can also be thought of as a homotopy from $x$ to $y-h \in G_*$, and this is the homotopy we seek.
   746 The homotopy $r$ can also be thought of as a homotopy from $x$ to $y-h \in G_*$, and this is the homotopy we seek.
   746 
   747 
   747 We will define $h$ inductive on bidegrees $(0, k-1), (1, k-2), \ldots, (k-1, 0)$.
   748 We will define $h$ inductively on bidegrees $(0, k-1), (1, k-2), \ldots, (k-1, 0)$.
   748 Define $h$ to be zero on bidegree $(0, k-1)$.
   749 Define $h$ to be zero on bidegree $(0, k-1)$.
   749 Let $p\otimes b$ be a generator occurring in $\bd x$ with bidegree $(1, k-2)$.
   750 Let $p\otimes b$ be a generator occurring in $\bd x$ with bidegree $(1, k-2)$.
   750 Using Lemma \ref{extension_lemma}, construct a homotopy $q$ from $p$ to $p'$ which is adapted to $\cU$.
   751 Using Lemma \ref{extension_lemma}, construct a homotopy $q$ from $p$ to $p'$ which is adapted to $\cU$.
   751 Define $h$ at $p\otimes b$ to be $q\otimes b$.
   752 Define $h$ at $p\otimes b$ to be $q\otimes b$.
   752 Let $p'\otimes b'$ be a generator occurring in $\bd x$ with bidegree $(2, k-3)$.
   753 Let $p'\otimes b'$ be a generator occurring in $\bd x$ with bidegree $(2, k-3)$.
   759 Define $h$ at $p'\otimes b'$ to be $q'\otimes b'$.
   760 Define $h$ at $p'\otimes b'$ to be $q'\otimes b'$.
   760 Continuing in this way, we define all of $h$.
   761 Continuing in this way, we define all of $h$.
   761 
   762 
   762 The homotopy $r$ is constructed similarly.
   763 The homotopy $r$ is constructed similarly.
   763 
   764 
   764 \nn{need to say something about uniqueness of $r$, $h$ etc.  
   765 \nn{need to say something about uniqueness of $r$, $h$ etc.
   765 postpone this until second draft.}
   766 postpone this until second draft.}
   766 
   767 
   767 At this point, we have finished defining the evaluation map.
   768 At this point, we have finished defining the evaluation map.
   768 The uniqueness statement in the proposition is clear from the method of proof.
   769 The uniqueness statement in the proposition is clear from the method of proof.
   769 All that remains is to show that the evaluation map gets along well with cutting and gluing,
   770 All that remains is to show that the evaluation map gets along well with cutting and gluing,