text/evmap.tex
changeset 91 ea5d8fbcd5bc
parent 90 80fc6e03d586
child 92 1a52d23b9719
equal deleted inserted replaced
90:80fc6e03d586 91:ea5d8fbcd5bc
   105 Suppose that there exists $V \sub X$ such that
   105 Suppose that there exists $V \sub X$ such that
   106 \begin{enumerate}
   106 \begin{enumerate}
   107 \item $V$ is homeomorphic to a disjoint union of balls, and
   107 \item $V$ is homeomorphic to a disjoint union of balls, and
   108 \item $\supp(p) \cup \supp(b) \sub V$.
   108 \item $\supp(p) \cup \supp(b) \sub V$.
   109 \end{enumerate}
   109 \end{enumerate}
   110 Let $W = X \setmin V$, and let $V' = p(V)$ and $W' = p(W)$.
   110 Let $W = X \setmin V$, $W' = p(W)$ and $V' = X\setmin W'$.
   111 We then have a factorization 
   111 We then have a factorization 
   112 \[
   112 \[
   113 	p = \gl(q, r),
   113 	p = \gl(q, r),
   114 \]
   114 \]
   115 where $q \in CD_k(V, V')$ and $r' \in CD_0(W, W')$.
   115 where $q \in CD_k(V, V')$ and $r \in CD_0(W, W')$.
   116 We can also factorize $b = \gl(b_V, b_W)$, where $b_V\in \bc_*(V)$ and $b_W\in\bc_0(W)$.
   116 We can also factorize $b = \gl(b_V, b_W)$, where $b_V\in \bc_*(V)$ and $b_W\in\bc_0(W)$.
   117 According to the commutative diagram of the proposition, we must have
   117 According to the commutative diagram of the proposition, we must have
   118 \[
   118 \[
   119 	e_X(p\otimes b) = e_X(\gl(q\otimes b_V, r\otimes b_W)) = 
   119 	e_X(p\otimes b) = e_X(\gl(q\otimes b_V, r\otimes b_W)) = 
   120 				gl(e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V), e_{WW'}(r\otimes b_W)) .
   120 				gl(e_{VV'}(q\otimes b_V), e_{WW'}(r\otimes b_W)) .
   462 If these balls are disjoint, let $U$ be their union.
   462 If these balls are disjoint, let $U$ be their union.
   463 Otherwise, assume WLOG that $S_{k-1}$ and $S_k$ are distance less than $2\phi_{k-1}r$ apart.
   463 Otherwise, assume WLOG that $S_{k-1}$ and $S_k$ are distance less than $2\phi_{k-1}r$ apart.
   464 Let $R_i = \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_i)$ for $i = 1,\ldots,k-2$ 
   464 Let $R_i = \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_i)$ for $i = 1,\ldots,k-2$ 
   465 and $R_{k-1} = \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_{k-1})\cup \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_k)$.
   465 and $R_{k-1} = \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_{k-1})\cup \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1} r}(S_k)$.
   466 Each $R_i$ is contained in a metric ball of radius $r' \deq (2\phi_{k-1}+2)r$.
   466 Each $R_i$ is contained in a metric ball of radius $r' \deq (2\phi_{k-1}+2)r$.
       
   467 Note that the defining inequality of the $\phi_i$ guarantees that
       
   468 \[
       
   469 	\phi_{k-1}r' = \phi_{k-1}(2\phi_{k-1}+2)r \le \phi_k r \le \rho(M) .
       
   470 \]
   467 By induction, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $R \deq \bigcup_i R_i$, 
   471 By induction, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $R \deq \bigcup_i R_i$, 
   468 homeomorphic to a disjoint union
   472 homeomorphic to a disjoint union
   469 of balls, and such that
   473 of balls, and such that
   470 \[
   474 \[
   471 	U \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1}r'}(R) = \Nbd_{t}(S) \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_k r}(S) ,
   475 	U \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_{k-1}r'}(R) = \Nbd_{t}(S) \subeq \Nbd_{\phi_k r}(S) ,