text/hochschild.tex
changeset 403 ef36cdefb130
parent 400 a02a6158f3bd
child 409 291f82fb79b5
equal deleted inserted replaced
402:853376c08d76 403:ef36cdefb130
    17 
    17 
    18 It is also worth noting that the original idea for the blob complex came from trying
    18 It is also worth noting that the original idea for the blob complex came from trying
    19 to find a more ``local" description of the Hochschild complex.
    19 to find a more ``local" description of the Hochschild complex.
    20 
    20 
    21 Let $C$ be a *-1-category.
    21 Let $C$ be a *-1-category.
    22 Then specializing the definitions from above to the case $n=1$ we have:
    22 Then specializing the definitions from above to the case $n=1$ we have: \nn{mention that this is dual to the way we think later} \nn{mention that this has the nice side effect of making everything splittable away from the marked points}
    23 \begin{itemize}
    23 \begin{itemize}
    24 \item $\cC(pt) = \ob(C)$ .
    24 \item $\cC(pt) = \ob(C)$ .
    25 \item Let $R$ be a 1-manifold and $c \in \cC(\bd R)$.
    25 \item Let $R$ be a 1-manifold and $c \in \cC(\bd R)$.
    26 Then an element of $\cC(R; c)$ is a collection of (transversely oriented)
    26 Then an element of $\cC(R; c)$ is a collection of (transversely oriented)
    27 points in the interior
    27 points in the interior
    29 The intervals between the points are labeled by objects of $C$, consistent with
    29 The intervals between the points are labeled by objects of $C$, consistent with
    30 the boundary condition $c$ and the domains and ranges of the point labels.
    30 the boundary condition $c$ and the domains and ranges of the point labels.
    31 \item There is an evaluation map $e: \cC(I; a, b) \to \mor(a, b)$ given by
    31 \item There is an evaluation map $e: \cC(I; a, b) \to \mor(a, b)$ given by
    32 composing the morphism labels of the points.
    32 composing the morphism labels of the points.
    33 Note that we also need the * of *-1-category here in order to make all the morphisms point
    33 Note that we also need the * of *-1-category here in order to make all the morphisms point
    34 the same way.
    34 the same way. \nn{Wouldn't it be better to just do the oriented version here? -S}
    35 \item For $x \in \mor(a, b)$ let $\chi(x) \in \cC(I; a, b)$ be the field with a single
    35 \item For $x \in \mor(a, b)$ let $\chi(x) \in \cC(I; a, b)$ be the field with a single
    36 point (at some standard location) labeled by $x$.
    36 point (at some standard location) labeled by $x$.
    37 Then the kernel of the evaluation map $U(I; a, b)$ is generated by things of the
    37 Then the kernel of the evaluation map $U(I; a, b)$ is generated by things of the
    38 form $y - \chi(e(y))$.
    38 form $y - \chi(e(y))$.
    39 Thus we can, if we choose, restrict the blob twig labels to things of this form.
    39 Thus we can, if we choose, restrict the blob twig labels to things of this form.
   128 \cP_i(F_*) & \xrightarrow{\cP_i(\pi)} \cP_i(M) \\
   128 \cP_i(F_*) & \xrightarrow{\cP_i(\pi)} \cP_i(M) \\
   129 \intertext{and}
   129 \intertext{and}
   130 \cP_*(F_j) & \xrightarrow{\cP_0(F_j) \onto H_0(\cP_*(F_j))} \coinv(F_j).
   130 \cP_*(F_j) & \xrightarrow{\cP_0(F_j) \onto H_0(\cP_*(F_j))} \coinv(F_j).
   131 \end{align*}
   131 \end{align*}
   132 The cone of each chain map is acyclic.
   132 The cone of each chain map is acyclic.
   133 In the first case, this is because the `rows' indexed by $i$ are acyclic since $\HC_i$ is exact.
   133 In the first case, this is because the `rows' indexed by $i$ are acyclic since $\cP_i$ is exact.
   134 In the second case, this is because the `columns' indexed by $j$ are acyclic, since $F_j$ is free.
   134 In the second case, this is because the `columns' indexed by $j$ are acyclic, since $F_j$ is free.
   135 Because the cones are acyclic, the chain maps are quasi-isomorphisms.
   135 Because the cones are acyclic, the chain maps are quasi-isomorphisms.
   136 Composing one with the inverse of the other, we obtain the desired quasi-isomorphism
   136 Composing one with the inverse of the other, we obtain the desired quasi-isomorphism
   137 $$\cP_*(M) \quismto \coinv(F_*).$$
   137 $$\cP_*(M) \quismto \coinv(F_*).$$
   138 
   138 
   234 Let $x \in L_*^\ep$ be a blob diagram.
   234 Let $x \in L_*^\ep$ be a blob diagram.
   235 \nn{maybe add figures illustrating $j_\ep$?}
   235 \nn{maybe add figures illustrating $j_\ep$?}
   236 If $*$ is not contained in any twig blob, we define $j_\ep(x)$ by adding 
   236 If $*$ is not contained in any twig blob, we define $j_\ep(x)$ by adding 
   237 $N_\ep$ as a new twig blob, with label $y - s(y)$ where $y$ is the restriction
   237 $N_\ep$ as a new twig blob, with label $y - s(y)$ where $y$ is the restriction
   238 of $x$ to $N_\ep$.
   238 of $x$ to $N_\ep$.
   239 If $*$ is contained in a twig blob $B$ with label $u=\sum z_i$,
   239 If $*$ is contained in a twig blob $B$ with label $u=\sum z_i$, \nn{I don't think we need to consider sums here}
   240 write $y_i$ for the restriction of $z_i$ to $N_\ep$, and let
   240 write $y_i$ for the restriction of $z_i$ to $N_\ep$, and let
   241 $x_i$ be equal to $x$ on $S^1 \setmin B$, equal to $z_i$ on $B \setmin N_\ep$,
   241 $x_i$ be equal to $x$ on $S^1 \setmin B$, equal to $z_i$ on $B \setmin N_\ep$,
   242 and have an additional blob $N_\ep$ with label $y_i - s(y_i)$.
   242 and have an additional blob $N_\ep$ with label $y_i - s(y_i)$.
   243 Define $j_\ep(x) = \sum x_i$.
   243 Define $j_\ep(x) = \sum x_i$.
   244 
   244