text/deligne.tex
changeset 299 f582f921bd95
parent 297 c1971082f94b
parent 298 25e551fed344
child 300 febbf06c3610
equal deleted inserted replaced
297:c1971082f94b 299:f582f921bd95
    70 \caption{An  $n$-dimensional fat graph}\label{delfig2}
    70 \caption{An  $n$-dimensional fat graph}\label{delfig2}
    71 \end{figure}
    71 \end{figure}
    72 
    72 
    73 More specifically, an $n$-dimensional fat graph consists of:
    73 More specifically, an $n$-dimensional fat graph consists of:
    74 \begin{itemize}
    74 \begin{itemize}
    75 \item ``Incoming" $n$-manifolds $M_1,\ldots,M_k$ and ``outgoing" $n$-manifolds $N_1,\ldots,N_k$,
    75 \item ``Upper" $n$-manifolds $M_0,\ldots,M_k$ and ``lower" $n$-manifolds $N_0,\ldots,N_k$,
    76 with $\bd M_i = \bd N_i$ for all $i$.
    76 with $\bd M_i = \bd N_i = E_i$ for all $i$.
    77 \item An ``outer boundary" $n{-}1$-manifold $E$.
    77 We call $M_0$ and $N_0$ the outer boundary and the remaining $M_i$'s and $N_i$'s the inner
    78 \item Additional manifolds $R_0,\ldots,R_{k+1}$, with $\bd R_i = E\cup \bd M_i = E\cup \bd N_i$.
    78 boundaries.
    79 (By convention, $M_i = N_i = \emptyset$ if $i <1$ or $i>k$.)
    79 \item Additional manifolds $R_1,\ldots,R_{k}$, with $\bd R_i = E_0\cup \bd M_i = E_0\cup \bd N_i$.
    80 We call $R_0$ the outer incoming manifold and $R_{k+1}$ the outer outgoing manifold
    80 %(By convention, $M_i = N_i = \emptyset$ if $i <1$ or $i>k$.)
    81 \item Homeomorphisms $f_i : R_i\cup N_i\to R_{i+1}\cup M_{i+1}$, $0\le i \le k$.
    81 \item Homeomorphisms 
       
    82 \begin{eqnarray*}
       
    83 	f_0: M_0 &\to& R_1\cup M_1 \\
       
    84 	f_i: R_i\cup N_i &\to& R_{i+1}\cup M_{i+1}\;\; \mbox{for}\, 1\le i \le k-1 \\
       
    85 	f_k: R_k\cup N_k &\to& N_0 .
       
    86 \end{eqnarray*}
       
    87 Each $f_i$ should be the identity restricted to $E_0$.
    82 \end{itemize}
    88 \end{itemize}
    83 We can think of the above data as encoding the union of the mapping cylinders $C(f_0),\ldots,C(f_k)$,
    89 We can think of the above data as encoding the union of the mapping cylinders $C(f_0),\ldots,C(f_k)$,
    84 with $C(f_i)$ glued to $C(f_{i+1})$ along $R_{i+1}$
    90 with $C(f_i)$ glued to $C(f_{i+1})$ along $R_{i+1}$
    85 (see Figure xxxx).
    91 (see Figure xxxx).
    86 \nn{also need to revise outer labels of older fig}
       
    87 The $n$-manifolds are the ``$n$-dimensional graph" and the $I$ direction of the mapping cylinders is the ``fat" part.
    92 The $n$-manifolds are the ``$n$-dimensional graph" and the $I$ direction of the mapping cylinders is the ``fat" part.
    88 We regard two such fat graphs as the same if there is a homeomorphism between them which is the 
    93 We regard two such fat graphs as the same if there is a homeomorphism between them which is the 
    89 identity on the boundary and which preserves the 1-dimensional fibers coming from the mapping
    94 identity on the boundary and which preserves the 1-dimensional fibers coming from the mapping
    90 cylinders.
    95 cylinders.
    91 More specifically, we impose the following two equivalence relations:
    96 More specifically, we impose the following two equivalence relations:
    93 \item If $g:R_i\to R_i$ is a homeomorphism, we can replace
    98 \item If $g:R_i\to R_i$ is a homeomorphism, we can replace
    94 \[
    99 \[
    95 	(\ldots, f_{i-1}, f_i, \ldots) \to (\ldots, g\circ f_{i-1}, f_i\circ g^{-1}, \ldots),
   100 	(\ldots, f_{i-1}, f_i, \ldots) \to (\ldots, g\circ f_{i-1}, f_i\circ g^{-1}, \ldots),
    96 \]
   101 \]
    97 leaving the $M_i$, $N_i$ and $R_i$ fixed.
   102 leaving the $M_i$, $N_i$ and $R_i$ fixed.
    98 (See Figure xxx.)
   103 (See Figure xxxx.)
    99 \item If $M_i = M'_i \du M''_i$ and $N_i = N'_i \du N''_i$ (and there is a
   104 \item If $M_i = M'_i \du M''_i$ and $N_i = N'_i \du N''_i$ (and there is a
   100 compatible disjoint union of $\bd M = \bd N$), we can replace
   105 compatible disjoint union of $\bd M = \bd N$), we can replace
   101 \begin{eqnarray*}
   106 \begin{eqnarray*}
   102 	(\ldots, M_{i-1}, M_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, M_{i-1}, M'_i, M''_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
   107 	(\ldots, M_{i-1}, M_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, M_{i-1}, M'_i, M''_i, M_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
   103 	(\ldots, N_{i-1}, N_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, N_{i-1}, N'_i, N''_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
   108 	(\ldots, N_{i-1}, N_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, N_{i-1}, N'_i, N''_i, N_{i+1}, \ldots) \\
   111 Note that the second equivalence increases the number of holes (or arity) by 1.
   116 Note that the second equivalence increases the number of holes (or arity) by 1.
   112 We can make a similar identification with the rolls of $M'_i$ and $M''_i$ reversed.
   117 We can make a similar identification with the rolls of $M'_i$ and $M''_i$ reversed.
   113 In terms of the ``sequence of surgeries" picture, this says that if two successive surgeries
   118 In terms of the ``sequence of surgeries" picture, this says that if two successive surgeries
   114 do not overlap, we can perform them in reverse order or simultaneously.
   119 do not overlap, we can perform them in reverse order or simultaneously.
   115 
   120 
   116 \nn{operad structure (need to ntro mroe terminology above}
   121 There is an operad structure on $n$-dimensional fat graphs, given by gluing the outer boundary
       
   122 of one graph into one of the inner boundaries of another graph.
       
   123 We leave it to the reader to work out a more precise statement in terms of $M_i$'s, $f_i$'s etc.
       
   124 
       
   125 For fixed $\ol{M} = (M_0,\ldots,M_k)$ and $\ol{N} = (N_0,\ldots,N_k)$, we let
       
   126 $FG^n_{\ol{M}\ol{N}}$ denote the topological space of all $n$-dimensional fat graphs as above.
       
   127 The topology comes from the spaces
       
   128 \[
       
   129 	\Homeo(M_0\to R_1\cup M_1)\times \Homeo(R_1\cup N_1\to R_2\cup M_2)\times
       
   130 			\cdots\times \Homeo(R_k\cup N_k\to N_0)
       
   131 \]
       
   132 and the above equivalence relations.
       
   133 We will denote the typical element of $FG^n_{\ol{M}\ol{N}}$ by $\ol{f} = (f_0,\ldots,f_k)$.
       
   134 
       
   135 
       
   136 \medskip
       
   137 
       
   138 Let $\ol{f} \in FG^n_{\ol{M}\ol{N}}$.
       
   139 Let $\hom(\bc_*(M_i), \bc_*(N_i))$ denote the morphisms from $\bc_*(M_i)$ to $\bc_*(N_i)$,
       
   140 as modules of the $A_\infty$ 1-category $\bc_*(E_i)$.
       
   141 We define a map
       
   142 \[
       
   143 	p(\ol{f}): \hom(\bc_*(M_1), \bc_*(N_1))\ot\cdots\ot\hom(\bc_*(M_k), \bc_*(N_k))
       
   144 				\to \hom(\bc_*(M_0), \bc_*(N_0)) .
       
   145 \]
       
   146 Given $\alpha_i\in\hom(\bc_*(M_i), \bc_*(N_i))$, we define $p(\ol{f}$ to be the composition
       
   147 \[
       
   148 	\bc_*(M_0)  \stackrel{f_0}{\to} \bc_*(R_1\cup M_1)
       
   149 				 \stackrel{\id\ot\alpha_1}{\to} \bc_*(R_1\cup N_1)
       
   150 				 \stackrel{f_1}{\to} \bc_*(R_2\cup M_2) \to
       
   151 				 \cdots  \stackrel{\id\ot\alpha_k}{\to} \bc_*(R_k\cup N_k)
       
   152 				 \stackrel{f_k}{\to} \bc_*(N_0)
       
   153 \]
       
   154 (Recall that the maps $\id\ot\alpha_i$ were defined in \nn{need ref}.)
       
   155 It is easy to check that the above definition is compatible with the equivalence relations
       
   156 and also the operad structure.
       
   157 
       
   158 \nn{little m-disks operad; }
   117 
   159 
   118 \nn{*** resume revising here}
   160 \nn{*** resume revising here}
   119 
   161 
   120 
   162 
   121 
       
   122 The components of the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad are indexed by tuples
       
   123 $(\overline{M}, \overline{N}) = ((M_0,\ldots,M_k), (N_0,\ldots,N_k))$.
       
   124 \nn{not quite true: this is coarser than components}
       
   125 Note that the suboperad where $M_i$, $N_i$ and $R_i\cup M_i$ are all homeomorphic to 
       
   126 the $n$-ball is equivalent to the little $n{+}1$-disks operad.
       
   127 \nn{what about rotating in the horizontal directions?}
       
   128 
       
   129 
       
   130 If $M$ and $N$ are $n$-manifolds sharing the same boundary, we define
       
   131 the blob cochains $\bc^*(A, B)$ (analogous to Hochschild cohomology) to be
       
   132 $A_\infty$ maps from $\bc_*(M)$ to $\bc_*(N)$, where we think of both
       
   133 collections of complexes as modules over the $A_\infty$ category associated to $\bd A = \bd B$.
       
   134 The ``holes" in the above 
       
   135 $n$-dimensional fat graph operad are labeled by $\bc^*(A_i, B_i)$.
       
   136 \nn{need to make up my mind which notation I'm using for the module maps}
       
   137 
   163 
   138 Putting this together we get 
   164 Putting this together we get 
   139 \begin{prop}(Precise statement of Property \ref{property:deligne})
   165 \begin{prop}(Precise statement of Property \ref{property:deligne})
   140 \label{prop:deligne}
   166 \label{prop:deligne}
   141 There is a collection of maps
   167 There is a collection of maps