text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex
changeset 385 b1da2a454ee7
parent 321 76c301fdf0a2
child 396 f58d590e8a08
--- a/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Mon Jun 21 15:28:02 2010 -0700
+++ b/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Tue Jun 22 18:05:09 2010 -0700
@@ -15,10 +15,14 @@
 We can't quite do the same with all $\cV_k$ just equal to $\cU$, but we can get by if we give ourselves arbitrarily little room to maneuver, by making the blobs we act on slightly smaller.
 \end{rem}
 \begin{proof}
+This follows from the remark \nn{number it and cite it?} following the proof of 
+Proposition \ref{CHprop}.
+\end{proof}
+\noop{
 We choose yet another open cover, $\cW$, which so fine that the union (disjoint or not) of any one open set $V \in \cV$ with $k$ open sets $W_i \in \cW$ is contained in a disjoint union of open sets of $\cU$.
 Now, in the proof of Proposition \ref{CHprop}
-\todo{I think I need to understand better that proof before I can write this!}
-\end{proof}
+[...]
+}
 
 
 \begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm:small-blobs}]