--- a/blob1.tex	Sun Jul 04 13:15:03 2010 -0600
+++ b/blob1.tex	Sun Jul 04 23:32:48 2010 -0600
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 
 \maketitle
 
-[revision $\ge$ 414;  $\ge$ 3 July 2010]
+[revision $\ge$ 417;  $\ge$ 4 July 2010]
 
 {\color[rgb]{.9,.5,.2} \large \textbf{Draft version, read with caution.}}
 We're in the midst of revising this, and hope to have a version on the arXiv soon.
@@ -25,24 +25,13 @@
 
 \paragraph{To do list}
 \begin{itemize}
-\item[1] (K) tweak intro
-\item[2] (S) needs explanation that this will be superseded by the n-cat
-definitions in \S 7.
-\item[2] (S) incorporate improvements from later
-\item[2.3] (S) foreshadow generalising; quotient to resolution
-\item[3] (K) look over blob homology section again
-\item[4] (S) basic properties, not much to do
-\item[5] (K) finish the lemmas in the Hochschild section
 \item[6] (K) proofs need finishing, then (S) needs to confirm details and try
 to make more understandable
-\item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting? Say something about $E_n$ algebras?
+\item[7] (S) do some work here -- identity morphisms are still imperfect. Say something about the cobordism and stabilization hypotheses \cite{MR1355899} in this setting?
 \item[7.6] is new! (S) read
 \item[8] improve the beginning, finish proof for products,
 check the argument about maps
 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off
-\item[10] (S) read what's already here
-\item[A] may need to weaken statement to get boundaries working (K) finish
-\item[B] (S) look at this, decide what to keep
 
 \item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}.
 \nn{KW: Do we need to do this?  We don't really classify field theories.
@@ -64,9 +53,10 @@
 
 }  % end \noop
 
+
+
 \tableofcontents
 
-
 \input{text/intro}
 
 \input{text/tqftreview}