blob to-do
author Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:04:08 -0800
changeset 927 8d64a28b2334
parent 919 259bef1b5dad
child 928 54503d88c969
permissions -rw-r--r--
figures todo


====== big ======

====== minor/optional ======

[probably NO] * consider proving the gluing formula for higher codimension manifolds with
morita equivalence

[probably NO] * leftover: we used to require that composition of A-infinity n-morphisms was injective (just like lower morphisms).  Should we stick this back in?  I don't think we use it anywhere.

* should we require, for A-inf n-cats, that families which preserve product morphisms act trivially?  as now defined, this is only true up to homotopy for the blob complex, so maybe best not to open that can of worms
(but since the strict version of this is true for BT_*, maybe we're OK)

* figures
** 13 "combining two balls" is lame
** colors in pinched products --K
** markings should be red 23/24/25/26/27 --S
** markings should be uniform thickness 24/25 --S
** pinched products need vertical lines 26/27 --S
** k-marked balls are currently an ugly blue 29/30/31/32/33 --K
** 38/39/40, pictures for Morita equivalence are handwritten
** figures for email thread with Mike Schulman??

* better discussion of systems of fields from disk-like n-cats
*** Is this done by now?
 
* make sure we are clear that boundary = germ
*** perhaps we are already clear enough
   
* framings and duality -- work out what's going on! (alternatively, vague-ify current statement)
*** is the new version sufficiently vague?


====== Scott ======

* SCOTT will go through appendix C.2 and make it better (Schulman's example?)

* SCOTT: review/proof-read recent KW changes, especially colimit section and n-cat axioms






(for reference:
	* places splitting axiom is used:
	** in the proof that gluing in dimension < n is injective
	** in the proof that D(a) is acyclic
	** in the small blobs lemma
)