diff -r ec9458975d92 -r 8e021128cf8f text/appendixes/famodiff.tex --- a/text/appendixes/famodiff.tex Wed May 19 12:50:16 2010 -0600 +++ b/text/appendixes/famodiff.tex Fri May 21 15:27:45 2010 -0600 @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ of $E$. Let $D_0$ and $D_1$ be the two $k$-handles of $\jj$ adjacent to $E$. There is at most one index $\beta$ such that $C(D_0, \beta) \ne C(D_1, \beta)$. -(If there is no such index $\beta$, choose $\beta$ +(If there is no such index, choose $\beta$ arbitrarily.) For $p \in E$, define \eq{ @@ -107,16 +107,20 @@ + r_\beta(x) (\eta(p) p(D_0, p) + (1-\eta(p)) p(D_1, p)) \right) . } -\nn{*** resume revising here ***} -In general, for $E$ a $k{-}j$-handle, there is a normal coordinate -$\eta: E \to R$, where $R$ is some $j$-dimensional polyhedron. -The vertices of $R$ are associated to $k$-cells of the $K_\alpha$, and thence to points of $P$. -If we triangulate $R$ (without introducing new vertices), we can linearly extend -a map from the vertices of $R$ into $P$ to a map of all of $R$ into $P$. -Let $\cN$ be the set of all $\beta$ for which $K_\beta$ has a $k$-cell whose boundary meets -the $k{-}j$-cell corresponding to $E$. -For each $\beta \in \cN$, let $\{q_{\beta i}\}$ be the set of points in $P$ associated to the aforementioned $k$-cells. +Now for the general case. +Let $E$ be a $k{-}j$-handle. +Let $D_0,\ldots,D_a$ be the $k$-handles adjacent to $E$. +There is a subset of cover indices $\cN$, of cardinality $j$, +such that if $\alpha\notin\cN$ then +$p(D_u, \alpha) = p(D_v, \alpha)$ for all $0\le u,v \le a$. +For fixed $\beta\in\cN$ let $\{q_{\beta i}\}$ be the set of values of +$p(D_u, \beta)$ for $0\le u \le a$. +Recall the product structure $E = B^{k-j}\times B^j$. +Inductively, we have defined functions $\eta_{\beta i}:\bd B^j \to [0,1]$ such that +$\sum_i \eta_{\beta i} = 1$ for all $\beta\in \cN$. +Choose extensions of $\eta_{\beta i}$ to all of $B^j$. +Via the projection $E\to B^j$, regard $\eta_{\beta i}$ as a function on $E$. Now define, for $p \in E$, \begin{equation} \label{eq:u} @@ -125,18 +129,18 @@ + \sum_{\beta \in \cN} r_\beta(x) \left( \sum_i \eta_{\beta i}(p) \cdot q_{\beta i} \right) \right) . \end{equation} -Here $\eta_{\beta i}(p)$ is the weight given to $q_{\beta i}$ by the linear extension -mentioned above. This completes the definition of $u: I \times P \times X \to P$. \medskip -Next we verify that $u$ has the desired properties. +Next we verify that $u$ affords $F$ the properties claimed in the statement of the lemma. Since $u(0, p, x) = p$ for all $p\in P$ and $x\in X$, $F(0, p, x) = f(p, x)$ for all $p$ and $x$. Therefore $F$ is a homotopy from $f$ to something. +\nn{*** resume revising here ***} + Next we show that if the $K_\alpha$'s are sufficiently fine cell decompositions, then $F$ is a homotopy through diffeomorphisms. We must show that the derivative $\pd{F}{x}(t, p, x)$ is non-singular for all $(t, p, x)$.