# HG changeset patch
# User Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
# Date 1277690693 25200
# Node ID 2e1b1efbf92819e7c918e8766f95737bb3951ed6
# Parent  7af6c89aa795db7c2669c17fa4c59377b973e252
minor

diff -r 7af6c89aa795 -r 2e1b1efbf928 text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex
--- a/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Sun Jun 27 13:41:43 2010 -0700
+++ b/text/appendixes/smallblobs.tex	Sun Jun 27 19:04:53 2010 -0700
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 It may be useful to look at Figure \ref{fig:erectly-a-tent-badly} to help understand the arrangement. The red, blue and orange $2$-cells there correspond to the $m=0$, $m=1$ and $m=2$ terms respectively, while the $3$-cells (only one of each type is shown) correspond to the terms in the homotopy $h$.
 \begin{figure}[!ht]
 $$\mathfig{0.5}{smallblobs/tent}$$
-\caption{``Erecting a tent badly.'' We know where we want to send a simplex, and each of the iterated boundary components. However, these do not agree, and we need to stitch the pieces together. Note that these diagrams don't exactly match the situation in the text: a $k$-simplex has $k+1$ boundary components, while a $k$-blob has $k$ boundary terms.}
+\caption{``Erecting a tent badly.'' We know where we want to send a simplex, and each of the iterated boundary components. However, these do not agree, and we need to stitch the pieces together. Note that these diagrams don't exactly match the situation in the text: a $k$-simplex has $k+1$ boundary components, while a $k$-blob has $k$ boundary terms. \nn{turn upside?}}
 \label{fig:erectly-a-tent-badly}
 \end{figure}