# HG changeset patch # User Scott Morrison # Date 1317928307 25200 # Node ID 2efd26072c91c0bd79cf3e799d6f99843ed395b4 # Parent 9ba67422f1b9feb07138acbb4f0e485ae08b6129 more referee comments, mostly adding cross-references to examples, lemma-izing the fields -> ncats construction diff -r 9ba67422f1b9 -r 2efd26072c91 RefereeReport.pdf Binary file RefereeReport.pdf has changed diff -r 9ba67422f1b9 -r 2efd26072c91 blob to-do --- a/blob to-do Tue Oct 04 17:12:08 2011 -0700 +++ b/blob to-do Thu Oct 06 12:11:47 2011 -0700 @@ -42,6 +42,6 @@ ====== Scott ====== -* SCOTT will go through appendix C.2 and make it better +* SCOTT will go through appendix C.2 and make it better (Schulman's example?) * SCOTT: review/proof-read recent KW changes, especially colimit section and n-cat axioms diff -r 9ba67422f1b9 -r 2efd26072c91 text/ncat.tex --- a/text/ncat.tex Tue Oct 04 17:12:08 2011 -0700 +++ b/text/ncat.tex Thu Oct 06 12:11:47 2011 -0700 @@ -1143,11 +1143,15 @@ invariance in dimension $n$, while in the fields definition we instead remember a subspace of local relations which contain differences of isotopic fields. (Recall that the compensation for this complication is that we can demand that the gluing map for fields is injective.) -Thus a \nn{lemma-ize} system of fields and local relations $(\cF,U)$ determines an $n$-category $\cC_ {\cF,U}$ simply by restricting our attention to +Thus +\begin{lem} +\label{lem:ncat-from-fields} +A system of fields and local relations $(\cF,U)$ determines an $n$-category $\cC_ {\cF,U}$ simply by restricting our attention to balls and, at level $n$, quotienting out by the local relations: \begin{align*} \cC_{\cF,U}(B^k) & = \begin{cases}\cF(B) & \text{when $k