# HG changeset patch # User Scott Morrison # Date 1304725979 25200 # Node ID a1deadac3fc08251c58f08de21f7fecce121ac97 # Parent 4c9e16fbe09b7d682f7223ba0f11672f416f27b3# Parent 4d78a4b4dda14e8087d1339da2f43f619bb60a16 Automated merge with https://tqft.net/hg/blob/ diff -r 4d78a4b4dda1 -r a1deadac3fc0 talks/2011-Teichner/Section7-Scott_Morrison.pdf Binary file talks/2011-Teichner/Section7-Scott_Morrison.pdf has changed diff -r 4d78a4b4dda1 -r a1deadac3fc0 text/deligne.tex --- a/text/deligne.tex Fri May 06 16:52:45 2011 -0700 +++ b/text/deligne.tex Fri May 06 16:52:59 2011 -0700 @@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ cylinders. More specifically, we impose the following two equivalence relations: \begin{itemize} -\item If $g: R_i\to R'_i$ is a homeomorphism, we can replace +\item If $g: R_i\to R'_i$ is a homeomorphism which restricts to the identity on +$\bd R_i = \bd R'_i = E_0\cup \bd M_i$, we can replace \begin{eqnarray*} (\ldots, R_{i-1}, R_i, R_{i+1}, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, R_{i-1}, R'_i, R_{i+1}, \ldots) \\ (\ldots, f_{i-1}, f_i, \ldots) &\to& (\ldots, g\circ f_{i-1}, f_i\circ g^{-1}, \ldots), diff -r 4d78a4b4dda1 -r a1deadac3fc0 text/intro.tex --- a/text/intro.tex Fri May 06 16:52:45 2011 -0700 +++ b/text/intro.tex Fri May 06 16:52:59 2011 -0700 @@ -552,8 +552,9 @@ Thomas Tradler, Kevin Costello, Chris Douglas, +Alexander Kirillov, and -Alexander Kirillov +Michael Shulman for many interesting and useful conversations. Peter Teichner ran a reading course based on an earlier draft of this paper, and the detailed feedback we got from the student lecturers lead to very many improvements in later drafts. diff -r 4d78a4b4dda1 -r a1deadac3fc0 text/ncat.tex --- a/text/ncat.tex Fri May 06 16:52:45 2011 -0700 +++ b/text/ncat.tex Fri May 06 16:52:59 2011 -0700 @@ -124,10 +124,13 @@ \end{lem} We postpone the proof of this result until after we've actually given all the axioms. -Note that defining this functor for some $k$ only requires the data described in Axiom \ref{axiom:morphisms} at level $k$, -along with the data described in the other axioms at lower levels. +Note that defining this functor for fixed $k$ only requires the data described in Axiom \ref{axiom:morphisms} at level $k$, +along with the data described in the other axioms for smaller values of $k$. -%In fact, the functors for spheres are entirely determined by the functors for balls and the subsequent axioms. (In particular, $\cC(S^k)$ is the colimit of $\cC$ applied to decompositions of $S^k$ into balls.) However, it is easiest to think of it as additional data at this point. +Of course, Lemma \ref{lem:spheres}, as stated, is satisfied by the trivial functor. +What we really mean is that there is exists a functor which interacts with other data of $\cC$ as specified +in the other axioms below. + \begin{axiom}[Boundaries]\label{nca-boundary} For each $k$-ball $X$, we have a map of sets $\bd: \cC_k(X)\to \cl{\cC}_{k-1}(\bd X)$. @@ -397,8 +400,12 @@ $$ \caption{Examples of pinched products}\label{pinched_prods} \end{figure} -(The need for a strengthened version will become apparent in Appendix \ref{sec:comparing-defs} -where we construct a traditional category from a disk-like category.) +The need for a strengthened version will become apparent in Appendix \ref{sec:comparing-defs} +where we construct a traditional category from a disk-like category. +For example, ``half-pinched" products of 1-balls are used to construct weak identities for 1-morphisms +in 2-categories. +We also need fully-pinched products to define collar maps below (see Figure \ref{glue-collar}). + Define a {\it pinched product} to be a map \[ \pi: E\to X @@ -476,6 +483,17 @@ } \end{scope} \end{tikzpicture} +\qquad +\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=0] +\begin{scope} +\path[clip] (0,0) arc (135:45:4) arc (-45:-135:4); +\draw[blue,line width=2pt] (0,0) arc (135:45:4) arc (-45:-135:4); +\draw[blue] (2.82,-5) -- (2.83,5); +\foreach \x in {0, 0.5, ..., 6} { + \draw[green!50!brown] (\x,-2) -- (\x,2); +} +\end{scope} +\end{tikzpicture} $$ \caption{Five examples of unions of pinched products}\label{pinched_prod_unions} \end{figure} @@ -512,7 +530,13 @@ Product morphisms are compatible with gluing (composition). Let $\pi:E\to X$, $\pi_1:E_1\to X_1$, and $\pi_2:E_2\to X_2$ be pinched products with $E = E_1\cup E_2$. +(See Figure \ref{pinched_prod_unions}.) +Note that $X_1$ and $X_2$ can be identified with subsets of $X$, +but $X_1 \cap X_2$ might not be codimension 1, and indeed we might have $X_1 = X_2 = X$. +We assume that there is a decomposition of $X$ into balls which is compatible with +$X_1$ and $X_2$. Let $a\in \cC(X)$, and let $a_i$ denote the restriction of $a$ to $X_i\sub X$. +(We assume that $a$ is splittable with respect to the above decomposition of $X$ into balls.) Then \[ \pi^*(a) = \pi_1^*(a_1)\bullet \pi_2^*(a_2) . @@ -674,6 +698,12 @@ \medskip +We define a $j$ times monoidal $n$-category to be an $(n{+}j)$-category $\cC$ where +$\cC(X)$ is a trivial 1-element set if $X$ is a $k$-ball with $k