# HG changeset patch
# User Scott Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
# Date 1278951477 21600
# Node ID 63ddcff5274839b1c545a6a6afbdb844ac4fe554
# Parent  e02bcd9f63c15b7b14ab7d7204e22e4225180735# Parent  30d04f3e5d0361bf720fd422ab741d96db96a2a6
Automated merge with https://tqft.net/hg/blob/

diff -r e02bcd9f63c1 -r 63ddcff52748 blob1.tex
--- a/blob1.tex	Sun Jul 11 21:43:02 2010 -0600
+++ b/blob1.tex	Mon Jul 12 10:17:57 2010 -0600
@@ -33,12 +33,6 @@
 check the argument about maps
 \item[9] (K) proofs trail off
 
-\item Work in the references Chris Douglas gave us on the classification of local field theories, \cite{BDH-seminar,DSP-seminar,schommer-pries-thesis,0905.0465}.
-\nn{KW: Do we need to do this?  We don't really classify field theories.
-I suppose our work could be interpreted as a alternative proof of cobordism hypothesis, but we 
-don't emphasize that at the moment.  
-On the other hand, I'm happy to do Chris a favor by citing this stuff.}
-
 \item Make clear exactly what counts as a ``blob diagram", and search for
 ``blob diagram"