# HG changeset patch # User Kevin Walker # Date 1275024589 25200 # Node ID 6c1b3c954c7ef0db3bea81522c4dc443b9a65e01 # Parent a798a1e00cb306dac7785816c76a2b33486c0303 more deligne.tex diff -r a798a1e00cb3 -r 6c1b3c954c7e text/deligne.tex --- a/text/deligne.tex Thu May 27 20:14:12 2010 -0700 +++ b/text/deligne.tex Thu May 27 22:29:49 2010 -0700 @@ -2,16 +2,14 @@ \section{Higher-dimensional Deligne conjecture} \label{sec:deligne} -In this section we discuss -\newenvironment{property:deligne}{\textbf{Property \ref{property:deligne} (Higher dimensional Deligne conjecture)}\it}{} - -\begin{property:deligne} -The singular chains of the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad act on blob cochains. -\end{property:deligne} - -We will state this more precisely below as Proposition \ref{prop:deligne}, and just sketch a proof. First, we recall the usual Deligne conjecture, explain how to think of it as a statement about blob complexes, and begin to generalize it. - -%\def\mapinf{\Maps_\infty} +In this section we +sketch +\nn{revisit ``sketch" after proof is done} +the proof of a higher dimensional version of the Deligne conjecture +about the action of the little disks operad on Hochschild cohomology. +The first several paragraphs lead up to a precise statement of the result +(Proposition \ref{prop:deligne} below). +Then we sketch the proof. The usual Deligne conjecture \nn{need refs} gives a map \[ @@ -20,9 +18,11 @@ \] Here $LD_k$ is the $k$-th space of the little disks operad, and $Hoch^*(C, C)$ denotes Hochschild cochains. -The little disks operad is homotopy equivalent to the fat graph operad -\nn{need ref; and need to restrict which fat graphs}, and Hochschild cochains are homotopy equivalent to $A_\infty$ endomorphisms -of the blob complex of the interval. +The little disks operad is homotopy equivalent to the +(transversely orient) fat graph operad +\nn{need ref, or say more precisely what we mean}, +and Hochschild cochains are homotopy equivalent to $A_\infty$ endomorphisms +of the blob complex of the interval, thought of as a bimodule for itself. \nn{need to make sure we prove this above}. So the 1-dimensional Deligne conjecture can be restated as \[ @@ -34,12 +34,16 @@ \begin{figure}[!ht] $$\mathfig{.9}{deligne/intervals}$$ \caption{A fat graph}\label{delfig1}\end{figure} +We emphasize that in $\hom(\bc^C_*(I), \bc^C_*(I))$ we are thinking of $\bc^C_*(I)$ as a module +for the $A_\infty$ 1-category associated to $\bd I$, and $\hom$ means the +morphisms of such modules as defined in +Subsection \ref{ss:module-morphisms}. We can think of a fat graph as encoding a sequence of surgeries, starting at the bottommost interval of Figure \ref{delfig1} and ending at the topmost interval. The surgeries correspond to the $k$ bigon-shaped ``holes" in the fat graph. We remove the bottom interval of the bigon and replace it with the top interval. -To map this topological operation to an algebraic one, we need, for each hole, an element of +To convert this topological operation to an algebraic one, we need, for each hole, an element of $\hom(\bc^C_*(I_{\text{bottom}}), \bc^C_*(I_{\text{top}}))$. So for each fixed fat graph we have a map \[ @@ -53,8 +57,11 @@ It should now be clear how to generalize this to higher dimensions. In the sequence-of-surgeries description above, we never used the fact that the manifolds involved were 1-dimensional. -Thus we can define a $n$-dimensional fat graph to be a sequence of general surgeries +Thus we can define an $n$-dimensional fat graph to be a sequence of general surgeries on an $n$-manifold. + +\nn{*** resume revising here} + More specifically, the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad can be thought of as a sequence of general surgeries $R_i \cup M_i \leadsto R_i \cup N_i$ together with mapping cylinders of diffeomorphisms @@ -62,7 +69,14 @@ (See Figure \ref{delfig2}.) \begin{figure}[!ht] $$\mathfig{.9}{deligne/manifolds}$$ -\caption{A fat graph}\label{delfig2}\end{figure} +\caption{A fat graph}\label{delfig2} +\end{figure} + + + + + + The components of the $n$-dimensional fat graph operad are indexed by tuples $(\overline{M}, \overline{N}) = ((M_0,\ldots,M_k), (N_0,\ldots,N_k))$. \nn{not quite true: this is coarser than components} diff -r a798a1e00cb3 -r 6c1b3c954c7e text/ncat.tex --- a/text/ncat.tex Thu May 27 20:14:12 2010 -0700 +++ b/text/ncat.tex Thu May 27 22:29:49 2010 -0700 @@ -1095,6 +1095,7 @@ \subsection{Morphisms of $A_\infty$ 1-cat modules} +\label{ss:module-morphisms} In order to state and prove our version of the higher dimensional Deligne conjecture (Section \ref{sec:deligne}),