# HG changeset patch # User kevin@6e1638ff-ae45-0410-89bd-df963105f760 # Date 1248474811 0 # Node ID 73cb0346f53c722f9d7055f2543933948d62ae91 # Parent a5f6a2ef9c9e93c4e57f42b2e831c99fc28a82da ... diff -r a5f6a2ef9c9e -r 73cb0346f53c text/ncat.tex --- a/text/ncat.tex Fri Jul 24 18:52:30 2009 +0000 +++ b/text/ncat.tex Fri Jul 24 22:33:31 2009 +0000 @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ a.k.a.\ actions). The definition will be very similar to that of $n$-categories. -Out motivating example comes from an $(m{-}n{+}1)$-dimensional manifold $W$ with boundary +Our motivating example comes from an $(m{-}n{+}1)$-dimensional manifold $W$ with boundary in the context of an $m{+}1$-dimensional TQFT. Such a $W$ gives rise to a module for the $n$-category associated to $\bd W$. This will be explained in more detail as we present the axioms. @@ -377,17 +377,23 @@ (As with $n$-categories, we will usually omit the subscript $k$.) -In our example, let $\cM(B, N) = \cD((B\times \bd W)\cup_{N\times \bd W} (N\times W))$, -where $\cD$ is the fields functor for the TQFT. +For example, let $\cD$ be the $m{+}1$-dimensional TQFT which assigns to a $k$-manifold $N$ the set +of maps from $N$ to $T$, modulo homotopy (and possibly linearized) if $k=m$. +Let $W$ be an $(m{-}n{+}1)$-dimensional manifold with boundary. +Let $\cC$ be the $n$-category with $\cC(X) \deq \cD(X\times \bd W)$. +Let $\cM(B, N) \deq \cD((B\times \bd W)\cup (N\times W))$. +(The union is along $N\times \bd W$.) Define the boundary of a marked $k$-ball $(B, N)$ to be the pair $(\bd B \setmin N, \bd N)$. Call such a thing a {marked $k{-}1$-hemisphere}. \xxpar{Module boundaries, part 1:} {For each $0 \le k \le n-1$, we have a functor $\cM_k$ from -the category of marked hemispheres (of dimension $k$) and +the category of marked $k$-hemispheres and homeomorphisms to the category of sets and bijections.} +In our example, let $\cM(H) \deq \cD(H\times\bd W \cup \bd H\times W)$. + \xxpar{Module boundaries, part 2:} {For each marked $k$-ball $M$ we have a map of sets $\bd: \cM(M)\to \cM(\bd M)$. These maps, for various $M$, comprise a natural transformation of functors.} @@ -400,9 +406,9 @@ \xxpar{Module domain $+$ range $\to$ boundary:} {Let $H = M_1 \cup_E M_2$, where $H$ is a marked $k$-hemisphere ($0\le k\le n-1$), -$B_i$ is a marked $k$-ball, and $E = B_1\cap B_2$ is a marked $k{-}1$-hemisphere. -Let $\cM(B_1) \times_{\cM(E)} \cM(B_2)$ denote the fibered product of the -two maps $\bd: \cM(B_i)\to \cM(E)$. +$M_i$ is a marked $k$-ball, and $E = M_1\cap M_2$ is a marked $k{-}1$-hemisphere. +Let $\cM(M_1) \times_{\cM(E)} \cM(M_2)$ denote the fibered product of the +two maps $\bd: \cM(M_i)\to \cM(E)$. Then (axiom) we have an injective map \[ \gl_E : \cM(M_1) \times_{\cM(E)} \cM(M_2) \to \cM(H) @@ -421,7 +427,10 @@ This fact will be used below. \nn{need to say more about splitableness/transversality in various places above} -We stipulate two sorts of composition (gluing) for modules, corresponding to two ways +In our example, the various restriction and gluing maps above come from +restricting and gluing maps into $T$. + +We require two sorts of composition (gluing) for modules, corresponding to two ways of splitting a marked $k$-ball into two (marked or plain) $k$-balls. First, we can compose two module morphisms to get another module morphism. @@ -534,7 +543,13 @@ \medskip - +Note that the above axioms imply that an $n$-category module has the structure +of an $n{-}1$-category. +More specifically, let $J$ be a marked 1-ball, and define $\cE(X)\deq \cM(X\times J)$, +where $X$ is a $k$-ball or $k{-}1$-sphere and in the product $X\times J$ we pinch +above the non-marked boundary component of $J$. +\nn{give figure for this, or say more?} +Then $\cE$ has the structure of an $n{-}1$-category. \medskip