# HG changeset patch # User Kevin Walker # Date 1271293923 25200 # Node ID c6ea1c9c504eebe767b851068b0363dc3e069c2e # Parent daf58017eec5583e9daa54ec2f8f90b22b04e251 evmap: assembly diff -r daf58017eec5 -r c6ea1c9c504e blob1.tex --- a/blob1.tex Sun Apr 11 10:38:38 2010 -0700 +++ b/blob1.tex Wed Apr 14 18:12:03 2010 -0700 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ \maketitle -[revision $>$ 246; $>$ 6 April 2010] +[revision $\ge$ 250; $\ge$ 14 April 2010] \textbf{Draft version, read with caution.} diff -r daf58017eec5 -r c6ea1c9c504e text/evmap.tex --- a/text/evmap.tex Sun Apr 11 10:38:38 2010 -0700 +++ b/text/evmap.tex Wed Apr 14 18:12:03 2010 -0700 @@ -487,11 +487,34 @@ where $t = \phi_{k-1}(2\phi_{k-1}+2)r + \phi_{k-1} r$. \end{proof} - \medskip +Next we assemble the maps $e_{i,m}$, for various $i$ but fixed $m$, into a single map +\[ + e_m: CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X) \to \bc_*(X) . +\] +More precisely, we will specify an $m$-connected subspace of the chain complex +of all maps from $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ to $\bc_*(X)$. -\hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip +First we specify an endomorphism $\alpha$ of $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$ using acyclic models. +Let $p\ot b$ be a generator of $CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$, with $n = \deg(p)$. +Let $i = k_{bmn}$ and $j = j_i$ be as in the statement of Lemma \ref{Gim_approx}. +Let $K_{p,b} \sub CH_*(X, X)$ be the union of the tracks of the homotopies from $g_l(p)$ to +$g_{l+1}(p)$, for all $l \ge j$. +This is a contractible set, and so therefore is $K_{p,b}\ot b \sub CH_*(X, X) \otimes \bc_*(X)$. +Without loss of generality we may assume that $k_{bmn} \ge k_{cm,n-1}$ for all blob diagrams $c$ appearing in $\bd b$. +It follows that $K_{p,b}\ot b \sub K_{q,c}\ot c$ for all $q\ot c$ +appearing in the boundary of $p\ot b$. +Thus we can apply Lemma \ref{xxxx} \nn{backward acyclic models lemma, from appendix} +to get the desired map $\alpha$, well-defined up to a contractible set of choices. + + + + + + + +\medskip\hrule\medskip\hrule\medskip \nn{outline of what remains to be done:} @@ -507,6 +530,7 @@ and $\hat{N}_{i,l}$ the alternate neighborhoods. Main idea is that for all $i$ there exists sufficiently large $k$ such that $\hat{N}_{k,l} \sub N_{i,l}$, and similarly with the roles of $N$ and $\hat{N}$ reversed. +\item prove gluing compatibility, as in statement of main thm \item Also need to prove associativity. \end{itemize}